1987 Mercury Grand Marquis 1 Owner Car 86,000 Miles Rebuilt Trans - $3000

1987 mercury grand marquisodometer: 86000
One Owner car - Needs Nothing Drive Anywhere--Very Hard to Find 2 Door

The first 9 Pictures on the Ebay Pics were just taken today..Got a New Camera

I am Selling this 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis 1 Owner car for my dad. He Loves the car but rarely drives it anymore...I take it to car shows... He owned the car 20 Years and has ALWAYS been Garaged.

One owner car. It was Independently Owned before us (Dealer) so it shows we are the only owner on the car.We have a car History report Printed out (Like a Car fax). Car has a Clean Title

This 1987 Mercury with 86000 original miles. He purchased it in 1992 with 58180 miles and after 20 years owning it now has 86000. The car was a Sunday car and used for family vacation to wild wood New Jersey.
The AOD transmission was rebuilt 4600 miles ago and we have paper work for it (cost $1000 to rebuild)

It has a 5.0 and has original paint. The interior has super soft plush cloth seats and looks brand new and the headliner does not have any sags in it.
The car is in great shape but has normal dings dents and scratches. Car runs great and is a get in and drive car.

Items that were replaced over the years were the normal brakes and rotors a tune up tires and battery. Also replaced was the back window (with a brand new one) the heat blew it out
gas and brake lines all the way back cat back exhaust passenger and driver side window motors and upper tie rod to name a few. The car was always well maintained.

Because of its age it is sold as is where is with no warranties expressed or implied. The car has antique plates if you live in Pa we can let them go with the car.
Antique plates do not require any inspection or registration on the car.

570-383-1125 leave a message if no answer ( Sorry i don't sit by the phone)

calls from 9 am to 9 pm ONLY

NO text its not a cell phone

or just contact me on here

$400.00 NON - Refundable deposit due within 48 hours after the auction end and balance due in cash when picked up within 2 weeks unless otherwise discussed upon

Car is sold as-is where is with no warranties expressed or implied whatsoever

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Yardy`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting

Address: 5410 Progress Blvd, Mc-Murray

Phone: (412) 854-5070

Xtreme Auto Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts

Address: 9907 Bustleton Ave, Holland

Phone: (215) 676-2660

Warwick Auto Park ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers

Address: 700 Furnace Hills Pike, Willow-Street

Phone: (717) 625-3500

Walter`s General Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service

Address: 195 N Spruce St, Watsontown

Phone: (570) 584-2257

Tire Consultants Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tires-Wholesale & Manufacturers

Address: 560 N Reading Rd, Reamstown

Phone: (717) 733-0388

Tim`s Auto ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers

Address: 379 Gravity Rd, Archbald

Phone: (570) 937-9248

Auto blog

Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch

Tue, 16 Jul 2013

A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.

Ford's J Mays feels vindicated by Fusion reception

Tue, 25 Sep 2012

It's hard to think back now, but the same man overseeing the design of the 2013 Ford Fusion also presided over a rather lackluster period in Ford design, highlighted by vehicles like the Five Hundred and Freestyle. With the redesigned Fusion receiving high praise, J Mays tells Automotive News that he feels vindicated from criticisms suggesting he's not a daring enough designer.
When Mays took over as lead of design in 1997, he admits to having quite an ego ("My head would barely fit through the door some days. I've long since gotten over myself") and the workload to match. With the Blue Oval's portfolio full of premium brands like Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo at that point, along with the bread-and-butter Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models, Mays certainly had quite the challenge.
It was in the mid-2000s that Mays took over just the premium brands, and took on the new title of Chief Creative Officer. At the time, Mays endured some criticism for looking backwards to retro styling, rather than setting a new standard for American car design - criticism that Mays says he is free from with the all-new Fusion.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"

1987 Mercury Grand Marquis Ls 2-door 5.0l 1 Owner 86,000 Miles Rebuilt Trans Htf on 2040-cars