1969 Lemans Convertible Gto Clone on 2040-cars
Othello, Washington, United States
Body Type:Convertible
Engine:350 Pontiac
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Pontiac
Model: Le Mans
Trim: convertible
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: Rear wheel drive
Options: Convertible
Mileage: 1,000
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Black
This is a 1969 LeMans convertible that has been tastefully cloned into a GTO. It has a 350 Pontiac/Turbo 400, non-posi rear end. It is built for looks not for speed. Bucket seats console shift. The car has fresh paint, new top, new carpet, new door panels, new seat upholstery, new exhaust. The car runs, and drives very nice, and looks real good. I get lots of comments, and stares. The car was a project I spent the last 13 years gathering parts, and doing the work as I could afford it. It just got painted, but I am missing a few items. When I got the car it had no exterior trim, and I have not finished buying all that it needs. It needs rocker panel molding, and wheel well molding for the passenger side. I was going to get new moldings, but have not done so yet. It is very close to being finished, but is drivable as is. A few things that need attention are
gas gauge- not working
dash lights-not working
speedometer-not working
All headlights, taillights, brake lights, turn signals front and rear all work fine. The top frame is old, and you have to be careful when raising, or lowering the top that it folds, and unfolds properly. Works fine, just have to watch it while raising/lowering. Power top. Tinted glass. It is not a show winner, but a fantastic looking driver.
No stereo, or speakers. This is a project that is about 95% complete. It still needs a few things, but can be driven as is. I drove it a lot this summer, and had a blast.
I have too many vehicles, and thought about selling it before it was painted, but wanted to wait until it was painted, and drivable so I could get more out of it. Want to make some room in my shop, and have decided to let it go if the reserve price is met.
Please contact me w/questions
Pontiac Le Mans for Sale
1972 pontiac lemans gt(US $2,750.00)
1970 pontiac lemans base 5.7l(US $1,000.00)
1970 pontiac lemans gto judge tribute(US $19,500.00)
1967 pontiac lemans - gto clone
1967 pontiac lemans - gto recreation?(US $2,000.00)
1972 pontiac lemans luxury one owner, 2 door, power windows, tilt, cold a/c
Auto Services in Washington
West Richland Auto Repair ★★★★★
We Fix IT Auto Repair ★★★★★
Trucks Plus Inc ★★★★★
Tru Autobody & Collision Repair LLC ★★★★★
Toyota of Renton ★★★★★
Toby`s Battery & Auto Electric ★★★★★
Auto blog
Lutz dishes dirt on GM in latest Autoline Detroit
Mon, 20 Jun 2011Bob Lutz sits down for Autoline Detroit - Click above to watch video after the jump
Autoline Detroit recently played host to Bob Lutz, and, as is always the case, the former General Motors vice chairman dished out some great commentary. Lutz was promoting his new book Car Guys vs. Bean Counters: The Battle for the Soul of American Business, and talk quickly turned to his role as it related to product development and high-level decision making at GM. While on the topic of brand management, Lutz revealed a few rather interesting tidbits about his former employer:
All Chevrolet vehicles were required to have five-spoke aluminum wheels and a chrome band up front, as part of the Bowtie brand's overall image.
This Auto Aerobics car art ties our brains in knots like pretzels
Sat, 14 Dec 2013We like cars, and we like art. Naturally, Chris Labrooy's Auto Aerobics series - computer-generated images of some seriously contorted 1968 Pontiac Bonnevilles floating in mid-air - instantly clicked with us. If the Pontiacs weren't floating or hollow, we could be fooled into believing the image is real. But where's the fun in that?
Check out the gallery we included of Labrooy's Bonneville art, and feel free too head over to his website for some Formula One humor.
This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero
Tue, Feb 10 2015Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...









