Used 2006 on 2040-cars
Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States
Body Type:flat bed with gooseneck b/w turn over ball
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.6 durramax diesel
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 3500
Trim: LS Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Options: am/fm stero, tow package, snow plow, 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: 4wd
Power Options: tilt wheel, power steering, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks
Mileage: 110,540
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
2006 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 pick up truck regular cab with 110540 miles, v8 6.6 duramax diesel engine with Allison transmission, power steering, air conditioning, single disc CD player, dual air bags, cruise control, power door locks, 4wd, ABS, tilt wheel, Am/FM stereo, steel wheels, snow plow, dual rear wheel, towing package rear deforest, 9 foot bed,
Chevrolet Silverado 3500 for Sale
2003 chevy silverado pick-up truck 3500 8.1 with allison automatic transmission
2001 silverado 3500 diesel 4 doors
2002 chevrolet silverado 3500
2004 chevy silverado 3500 extended cab lt pickup, v8, 6.6l turbo diesel, dually(US $15,000.00)
2008 chevy 3500 hd duramax dually 4x4
2008 chevrolet silverado duramax 3500hd 4wd ext utility imported from florida!(US $23,990.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
Trick Trucks & Cars ★★★★★
Suttons Auto Repair ★★★★★
SPRING AUTOMOTIVE ★★★★★
Sloan Services Inc ★★★★★
Salisbury Towing ★★★★★
R & Z Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
Chevy Bolt wins 2017 Green Car of the Year
Thu, Nov 17 2016We knew that a plug-in vehicle was going to win the 2017 Green Car of the Year award this year, given that all five finalists have a way to charge up. And when Ron Cogan, the editor and publisher of Green Car Journal, announced the winner – the 2017 Chevy Bolt EV – he said that the car itself represents one of those times in the auto industry when everything is about to change. Similar to the invention of the starter motor, things are about to get different. For now, though, the fact that the Bolt EV won an award sounds like the same old thing all over again. Just this week, it was named Motor Trends Car of the Year and to the Car And Driver Top 10 list. The other four finalists for Green Car of the Year included the Toyota Prius Prime, the Chrysler Pacifica, the Kia Optima (including hybrid and plug-in hybrid models) and the BMW 330e iPerformance. Last year, the winner was the 2016 Chevy Volt. Did Green Car Journal make the right selection this year? See the award ceremony below.
GM recalls 8,500 Chevrolet Malibu models for rear suspension glitch
Mon, 04 Feb 2013According to a letter from General Motors to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, flaws in the build process of the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu have led to the recall of 8,519 cars. Units built between December 6, 2011 and January 15, 2013 may have been assembled with rear suspension cradles that had insufficient torque applied to certain bolts. That out-of-spec assembly could lead to issues ranging from slight noises to a loss of vehicle control.
The problem was first noticed in December of last year by a GM test fleet driver and eventually tracked back to the improperly torqued bolts on the suspension cradle assembled through July 2012 by a supplier located not too far from the Malibu's Detroit/Hamtramck Assembly Plant. Since an official NHTSA recall notice has not been issued yet, it isn't clear whether or not Detroit-built Malibus were the only ones affected (the 2013 Malibu is also built at GM's Fairfax Assembly Plant in Kansas City, Kansas). Dealers will fix the problem by inspecting vehicles for proper torque specs, retightening if not within specs and, in some cases, perform a rear-wheel alignment.



