1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 on 2040-cars
Pharr, Texas, United States
1969 FORD MUSTANG MACH 1 S-CODE BB 390 4V
88422 MILES. I’M THE SECOND OWNER OF THE CAR. ORIGINAL MOTOR SEIZED IN 1978 WHERE IT SAT COVERED IN SANTA
BARBARA, CA UNTIL I ACQUIRED IT IN 2000. THIS CLASSIC CAR BEGAN A MULTI YEAR BUMPER TO BUMPER RESTORATION KEEPING
EVERY POSSIBLE ORIGINAL COMPONENT INCLUDING MOST ENGINE AND DRIVETRAIN COMPONENTS, DASHBOARD, DASH PAD, CENTER
CONSOLE AND RIM BLOW STEERING WHEEL, AS WELL AS ALL EXTERIOR TRIM EXCEPT BUMPERS. NEARLY ALL SHEET METAL IS
ORIGINAL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DAMAGE TO THE RIGHT REAR OF THE CAR WHICH HAS BEEN PROPERLY RESTORED. THE BODY WAS
TAKEN DOWN TO BARE METAL BEFORE PAINT.
THE NUMBERS MATCHING BLOCK DID NOT LAST THROUGH ITS OVERHAUL SO THE RESTORATION WAS COMPLETED IN 2008 WITH AN
EXPERTLY-BUILT YEAR-APPROPRIATE 390 4V BIG BLOCK AND OVERHAULED C6 AUTO TRANS WITH SHIFT KIT. ENGINE AND
TRANSMISSION LESS THAN 1000 MILES. ALTHOUGH NOW A 10 YEAR RESTORATION, IT HOLDS UP BEAUTIFULLY INSIDE AND OUT. I
JUST HAD A $3000 PAINT TOUCH UP SERVICING TO ADDRESS A FEW HAIR LINE BLEMISHES THAT HAVE OCCURRED HERE IN THE AUTIN
HEAT OVER THE YEARS. YOU CAN SEE MINOR FADING IN A FEW SPOTS BUT IS STILL ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS.
IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN GARAGED AND IS VERY MUCH A PRIZED POSSESSION. NO CORNERS CUT. ALWAYS ABOVE AND BEYOND. I HAVE
SPARED NO EXPENSE. MY ONLY REGRET IS NOT DRIVING IT MORE BUT I DIDN’T WANT TO PILE ON THE MILES. IT MOSTLY WENT
ON SUNDAY DRIVES.
RECENT POWER FRONT WHEEL DISC BRAKES
RECENT REAR DRUM BRAKES
POWER STEERING
ALL GUAGES HAVE BEEN RESTORED AND ARE WORKING
CAST IRON HEADERS
EXPORT BRACE & MONTE CARLO BAR
RECENT EDELBROCK INTAKE AND 800 CFM CARBURATOR
RECENT OIL PAN
RECENT FRONT END WORK
5 LEAF REAR SPRINGS WITH KYB SHOCKS FRONT AND BACK
CUSTOM AUTOSOUND SYSTEM FOR 69 MUSTANG
MAGNUM 500 WHEELS 15/7 FRONT 15/8 REAR
NEW BF GOODRICH TIRES 235/60 FRONT 255/60 REAR
2 CHAMBER FLOWMASTER DUAL EXHAUST
PERTRONIX ELECTRONIC IGNITION
Ford Mustang for Sale
2008 ford mustang roush
(US $14,000.00)1965 ford mustang fastback(US $10,850.00)
2013 ford mustang(US $11,410.00)
2007 ford mustang roush stage 3(US $10,150.00)
1968 ford mustang(US $11,200.00)
1970 ford mustang boss 302(US $10,990.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Youniversal Auto Care & Tire Center ★★★★★
Xtreme Window Tinting & Alarms ★★★★★
Vision Auto`s ★★★★★
Velocity Auto Care LLC ★★★★★
US Auto House ★★★★★
Unique Creations Paint & Body Shop Clinic ★★★★★
Auto blog
2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid vs other hybrid crossovers | How they compare on paper
Thu, Sep 19 2019The long-anticipated 2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid was announced yesterday, and although we don't have every spec available (including the all-important official fuel economy figures), Honda provided enough that we can piece together a comparison of powertrain specs and dimensions. The same can be said of the 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid, which we just drove for the first time. Together, they represent a significant increase in the number of compact crossover hybrids, as the current total is one: the 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. The old Nissan Rogue Hybrid has been discontinued, leaving the subcompact Kia Niro Hybrid as the only other vehicle in the ballpark. As you'll see below, its size and performance are much different than the others, but its fuel economy and price are superior. Performance The RAV4 Hybrid is the performance champ of the group, but both it and the new CR-V Hybrid are actually more powerful than their respective gas-only siblings. Although the added weight of its battery pack negates much of that horsepower advantage, the RAV4 Hybrid's subsequent acceleration is indeed a smidge quicker than the gas-only version. It will be interesting to see if that's the case with the CR-V. By contrast, the Ford Escape offers a 250-horsepower 2.0-liter turbo engine, meaning the hybrid variation is most definitely not the Escape's highest-performance offering. Nevertheless, the Hybrid does produce more power than the base 181-horsepower 1.5-liter three-cylinder. The Niro, meanwhile, brings up the rear in terms of performance, but Kia estimates a perfectly acceptable 0-60 time of 8.6 seconds. The others are likely in the mid-7-second range. Fuel economy This is ultimately an open question since we don't have official figures for the CR-V and Escape. Based on Honda's estimate of the CR-V Hybrid being 50% more efficient in the city than the gas-only version, our calculators say it should get 43 mpg in the city. Then, based on information provided on the Escape Hybrid first drive and some more calculation, our best guestimate for it is 40 mpg. Either way, given how mpg is calculated, any potential differences between them in terms of actual fuel burned should be negligible. On the other hand, most Kia Niros sold get 51 mpg in the city and 49 mpg combined. According to the EPA, that translates to an annual average fuel cost of $750. The RAV4 Hybrid, by contrast, is $900. FWD vs AWD Note that the CR-V and RAV4 come standard with all-wheel drive.
For EV drivers, realities may dampen the electric elation
Mon, Feb 20 2023The Atlantic, a decades-old monthly journal well-regarded for its intelligent essays on international news, American politics and cultural happenings, recently turned its attention to the car world. A piece that ran in The Atlantic in October examined the excesses of the GMC Hummer EV for compromising safety. And now in its latest edition, the magazine ran a compelling story about the challenges of driving an electric vehicle and how those experiences “mythologize the car as the great equalizer.” Titled “The Inconvenient Truth About Electric Vehicles,” the story addresses the economics of EVs, the stresses related to range anxiety, the social effects of owning an electric car — as in, affording one — and the overarching need for places to recharge that car. Basically, author Andrew Moseman says that EV life isn't so rosy: “On the eve of the long-promised electric-vehicle revolution, the myth is due for an update. Americans who take the plunge and buy their first EV will find a lot to love Â… they may also find that electric-vehicle ownership upends notions about driving, cost, and freedom, including how much car your money can buy. "No one spends an extra $5,000 to get a bigger gas tank in a Honda Civic, but with an EV, economic status is suddenly more connected to how much of the world you get to see — and how stressed out or annoyed youÂ’ll feel along the way.” Moseman charts how a basic Ford F-150 Lightning electric truck might start at $55,000, but an extended-range battery, which stretches the distance on a charge from 230 miles to 320, “raises the cost to at least $80,000. The trend holds true with all-electric brands such as Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid, and for many electric offerings from legacy automakers. The bigger battery option can add a four- or five-figure bump to an already accelerating sticker price.” As for the charging issue, the author details his anxiety driving a Telsa in Death Valley, with no charging stations in sight. “For those who never leave the comfort of the city, these concerns sound negligible," he says. "But so many of us want our cars to do everything, go everywhere, ferry us to the boundless life we imagine (or the one weÂ’re promised in car commercials),” he writes. His conclusions may raise some hackles among those of us who value automotive independence — not to mention fun — over practicalities.
Weekly Recap For 6.24.16 | Autoblog Minute
Sat, Jun 25 2016Leaked photos of the 2017 Porsche Panamera, and spy shots of the Jeep Wrangler and Ford Fiesta ST. Senior Producer Chris McGraw reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute. Ford Jeep Porsche Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video ford fiesta st fiesta st