1980 Ford Fairmont Futura on 2040-cars
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:Inline 6
Body Type:2 Door
Vehicle Title:Clean
Year: 1980
Mileage: 12062
Interior Color: Other Color
Manufacturer Interior Color: Brown/gold plaid
Fuel Consumption Rate: Authentic and Correct
Drive Side: Left-Hand Drive
Independent Vehicle Inspection: Yes
Engine Size: 3.3
Exterior Color: Bronz
Car Type: Classic Cars
Number of Doors: 2
Manufacturer Exterior Color: Brown
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: Futura
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Drive Type: 2WD
Model: Fairmont
Country/Region of Manufacture: United States
Ford Fairmont for Sale
1980 ford fairmont fresh restoration a/c power steering & brakes(US $14,500.00)
1978 ford fairmont(US $4,995.00)
1932 ford roadster(US $18,400.00)
Ford fairmont futura(US $2,000.00)
1978 ford fairmont(US $2,000.00)
1981 ford fairmont *10k original miles *1 owner(US $8,700.00)
Auto Services in Minnesota
Tire Pros & Wheel Experts ★★★★★
Southern Minnesota Auto & Motor Sport ★★★★★
Prior Lake Transmission ★★★★★
Oscar Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Northside Auto ★★★★★
Nordic Auto Glass LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
2016 Ford Focus RS leaked ahead of official debut
Tue, Feb 3 2015We won't officially see the new Ford Focus RS until the Blue Oval shows it to the world at an event on Tuesday, but here it is ahead of time, courtesy of the folks at Evo. As you can see, this is one hot little hatch, and if Evo's story is to be believed, those aggressive looks will be backed up with some pretty serious performance. Power is said to come from Ford's 2.3-liter EcoBoost inline four-cylinder engine, though the magazine's estimate of 250 horsepower seems awfully conservative to us (considering that's less than the current Focus ST). If earlier reports are to be believed, we think the RS will come packing more like 300 hp, if not more. For the first time, the Focus RS will use all-wheel drive with brake-operated torque-vectoring, and Evo says that up to 70 percent of the engine's power can be sent to the rear wheels. Hitting 60 miles per hour will reportedly take less than five seconds. Otherwise, it's business as usual, with a mean-looking exterior complete with the necessary aero bits (notice that wing!), and inside, we can see a beefy set of Recaro chairs. That's really all we know for now, but stay tuned for more when the Focus RS makes its official debut in the not-too-distant future. Related Video:
Ford paying $750 million just to close plant in Belgium
Thu, 21 Mar 2013According to a report from Reuters, Ford is shelling out $750 million in a severance deal that will see the automaker close its facility in Genk, Belgium. The automaker reached this deal with the 4,000 hourly workers employed at the plant last week, which means the company will pay out an average of $187,500 per worker.
Ford is still negotiating with the 300 salaried workers at the factory, which currently produces the Mondeo sedan. All told, Ford expects to lose around $2 billion in Europe thanks in no small part to the region's ongoing economic downturn, and two more plants are scheduled to be shut down in Europe this year. The company will log its $750 million payout under "special items" for this quarter.
As you may recall, Ford took a similar path in the US back in 2009 when the domestic market took a spill. Back then, the company shelled out around $50,000 per employee with at least one year of experience, plus either $25,000 toward a new car or an extra cash payment of $20,000. It would seem the cost of closing plants in Belgium is a much harder pill to swallow than in the States...





























