2000 Chevy S10 Ss 5 3 V8 Ls1 Turbo 400 Sharp Truck on 2040-cars
Ballston Spa, New York, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:5.3 LS
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: S-10
Trim: SS
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: Rear Wheel
Mileage: 43,292
Options: CD Player
Sub Model: SS
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Exterior Color: Black
Project LSX S10 for sale. The truck is a 2000 S10 Reg Cab, short bed. It has a 5.3L LS motor with a Texas Speed Cam, 112 lobe sep. 232/234 @ .500 duration. The motor also has comp cam lifters, valve springs and pushrods. The transmission is a Maxwell Turbo 400, manual valve body and a TCI 3500 stall converter. Rearend is a 10 bolt with 3.42's in it.
THIS TRUCK NEEDS FINISHING!!!! It does come with LS1 injectors, however you can run a carb setup, whatever you'd like. Basically it needs a fuel system (comes with a fuel cell), exhaust, radiator and it's ready to go. Price is pretty firm as I have all of that plus some in the motor and transmission, including the swap.
Chevrolet S-10 for Sale
Auto Services in New York
Websmart II ★★★★★
Wappingers Auto Tech ★★★★★
Wahl To Wahl Auto ★★★★★
Vic & Al`s Turnpike Auto Inc ★★★★★
USA Cash For Cars Inc ★★★★★
Tru Dimension Machining Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Officially Official: Chevrolet replaces Daewoo name in Korea
Thu, 20 Jan 2011
Chevrolet Camaro in Korea - Click above for high-resolution image
There once was a time when Daewoo was one of the biggest companies in South Korea. It was larger than both LG and Samsung, and second only to Hyundai. But these days the name is all but gone.
GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect
Tue, 17 Aug 20102010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.