04 Chevy Monte Carlo Ss Dale Jr Edition on 2040-cars
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
2004 Monte Carlo SS, Dale Earnhardt Jr Package, 42,000 original miles, Clean Carfax, Vehicle has been inspected top to bottom. There are no mechanical issues of any sort. Vehicle has undergone a complete service, to include replacement of tires, front and rear brake pads, and rotors. There is no evidence of any corrosion, to include undercarriage. There is no evidence that this vehicle has ever been involved in an accident.
|
Chevrolet Monte Carlo for Sale
- 1970 chevrolet monte carlo base hardtop 2-door 5.7l
- 1987 chevrolet monte carlo ss original black california car with factory t-tops
- 1974 chevy monte carlo
- Ss coupe 3.8l super charged dale earnhardt jr dei intimidator edition leather
- Selling my monte carlo as
- 1997 chevrolet monte carlo z34 coupe 2-door 3.4l(US $3,895.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
West Specialty Products Used Cars ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Star Automotive ★★★★★
Stack`s Wholesale Auto Parts ★★★★★
Scott`s Automotive ★★★★★
Reid`s Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
UAW to vote on strike at Kentucky Corvette plant
Tue, 08 Apr 2014The current wait time for a new Chevrolet Corvette Stingray is well, not short. With word of a strike at the Bowling Green, KY factory responsible for seventh-generation sports car, though, that wait time could end up growing substantially.
Now, a strike is still a ways off. UAW Local 2164, which represents the 800 workers responsible for screwing the Corvette together, is set to vote on authorizing a strike today, but even if the employees give the action a go, it's far from a sure thing. According to The Tennessean, both regional and national union officials would need to put their stamp of approval on strike action.
"The membership has to vote to strike, but it's just a step in the process," said Gary Casteel, the UAW's Region 8 director and one of the people that would need to authorize a strike action. Casteel told The Tennessean, "It's purely a local situation, though. They are having some issues with the local management."
GM investing $167m in Spring Hill for new midsize vehicles
Tue, 06 Aug 2013General Motors has announced a large investment in its Spring Hill, Tennessee facility. The former home of Saturn production will be getting a $167 million addition to a previously announced $183 million, to cover a pair of new midsize vehicles. The investment is expected to create 1,800 jobs at the factory.
That $350 million is being divvied up for a pair of programs at Spring Hill. The first will take the bulk of the money ($223 million) and create 1,000 of the 1,800 jobs, while the other will take the remaining $127 million and generate the leftover 800 positions. But GM says the investment will cover "midsize vehicle programs." So what could they be?
The leading candidate in our minds is a new crossover for Buick, called the Anthem, that will slot between the Encore and Enclave, but will be slightly smaller than the Equinox and Terrain. As we've explained, the new model will likely be the first product to sport GM's new D2UX platform, which will eventually replace both the Delta and Theta platforms. Spring Hill is already building the Equinox, so there could be some credence to this theory.
GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect
Tue, 17 Aug 20102010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.