Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1960 Chevrolet Impala - Rare Factory 348 Ci V8 Tri-power / 4 Speed Manual Trans. on 2040-cars

Year:1960 Mileage:24000
Location:

Frederick, Colorado, United States

Frederick, Colorado, United States

This Beautiful Car Was One of the Most Popular Muscle Cars of the Early 1960's. 

In terms of mechanical condition, the car has the most sought after powertrain with

3 - two barrel carburetors on a 348 combined with the correct factory 4 speed

manual transmission.  Cosmetically this jewel commands attention wherever it goes because

of the laser straight body, gorgeous bright Roman Red paint and stunning red / white interior. 

 

This car is said to have an Original 24,000+ Pampered Miles and you must drive it to really appreciate the

wonderful 'Factory' driving car.   This car has not been torn apart and is 99% the way it came from

dealership in 1960!  Fit and Finish is Second to None!

 

Auto Services in Colorado

Your Favorite Mechanic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Noble St, Rollinsville
Phone: (303) 279-7102

Wolfsburg Autowerks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 1001 Lee Hill Dr, Ward
Phone: (720) 282-1149

Weissach Performance ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 2516 49th St, Boulder
Phone: (303) 444-7210

Valley Subaru of Longmont ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1005 Ken Pratt Blvd., Longmont
Phone: (720) 442-9848

U-Haul Trailer Hitch Super Center of Littleton ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Trailer Hitches, Automobile Accessories
Address: 4845 4859 S Santa Fe, Bow-Mar
Phone: (303) 972-3800

Trinity Motors Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 2226 E Platte Ave, Cascade
Phone: (719) 630-7220

Auto blog

Consumer Reports declares most and least loved cars [w/video]

Wed, Dec 3 2014

Consumer Reports is crunching the numbers from its annual owner-satisfaction survey, and part of that process is finding out how attached drivers are to their cars. CR simply asks readers of models up to three years old if they would buy the same vehicle again in light of their entire ownership experience, and tallies the results. After looking at the responses for about 350,000 vehicles, it turns out that people really love a certain California-built, electrically powered luxury sedan. That's right, this year's the overall winner was the Tesla Model S with a whopping 98 percent of owners saying they would purchase another one (the Model S also won this award last year, with 99 percent satisfaction). The Chevrolet Corvette Stingray came in a close second with 95 percent of drivers hoping to park another one in their garage. A few models weren't quite so favored, though. The Nissan Versa Sedan was the least loved model among its owners; a mere 42 percent said that they would purchase another. The aging Jeep Compass didn't do much better, with just 43 percent of drivers willing to buy the softroader again. On average, about 70 percent of owners say they would buy their car again, and only four cars ranked below 50 percent in CR's findings. Check out the video above to see some of the winners and losers in a few of CR's categories. If you're a subscriber, you can check out the full list on its website. Related Gallery Consumer Reports Most Loved Cars 2014 Related Gallery Consumer Reports Least Loved Cars 2014 News Source: Consumer Reports - sub. req., Consumer Reports via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Mazda Mercedes-Benz Porsche Subaru Tesla Ownership Videos car ownership

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

GM warning 800,000 owners that their cars may need oil changes more frequently than they say

Fri, 05 Apr 2013

The days of changing your engine oil every 3,000 miles are long gone thanks to most cars having automatic oil monitoring systems, but about 800,000 General Motors vehicles apparently have incorrect monitoring software that is leading to premature engine component wear. According to Autoweek, certain 2010-2012 Buick LaCrosse, Regal, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain models equipped with 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines could be going too long in between oil changes resulting in a higher-than-normal number of warranty claims for the engine's balance chain. The balance chain links the balance shaft to the crankshaft, and a worn one can produce higher noise levels.
As a fix, GM dealers will be reprogramming the software for the monitors in an effort to reduce the interval between oil changes, which varies based on driving habits and conditions. Through February 2015, the software update will be done at no cost to vehicle owners, but since this is not a recall, after that point, it will be up to the discretion of dealers as to whether or not they will charge for the service. What isn't immediately clear is whether GM plans on giving assistance to out-of-warranty customers who are experiencing engine issues from the worn chain.