2011 Ford Mustang Shelby Gt500 Svt Cobra 6-speed Nav 8k Texas Direct Auto on 2040-cars
Stafford, Texas, United States
Engine:5.4L 5409CC 330Cu. In. V8 GAS DOHC Supercharged
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Coupe
Transmission:Manual
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Ford
Options: CD Player
Model: Mustang
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Side Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Trim: Shelby GT500 Coupe 2-Door
Power Options: Power Seats, Power Windows, Power Locks, Cruise Control
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2
Mileage: 8,813
CALL NOW: 832-947-9939
Sub Model: SUPERCHARGED
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected
Exterior Color: Red
Seller Rating: 5 STAR *****
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 2010 ford mustang shelby gt500 svt cobra 6-spd nav 24k! texas direct auto(US $39,980.00)
- 2012 ford mustang gt prem 5.0 auto leather spoiler 16k! texas direct auto(US $26,980.00)
- 13 shelby! 5.8 v8! supercharged! gt500 svt! leather! navigation! 14k low miles!(US $59,912.00)
- 2013 ford mustang gt 5.0 convertible 6spd leather 19's! texas direct auto(US $31,980.00)
- 5.0l v8 ford racing supercharger! rare shelby gts! shelby exhaust! #33!(US $59,912.00)
- 2012 ford mustang gt prem 5.0 6-spd ground effects 10k texas direct auto(US $28,980.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Zoil Lube ★★★★★
Young Chevrolet ★★★★★
Yhs Automotive Service Center ★★★★★
Woodlake Motors ★★★★★
Winwood Motor Co ★★★★★
Wayne`s Car Care Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings
Fri, 10 May 2013Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.
Report: GM struggling to market turbo technology
Tue, 20 Apr 2010In the automotive realm, marketing can sometimes prove just as important as the actual product. Take, for instance, Ford's well regarded EcoBoost technology, which couples turbocharging with direct injection to produce more horsepower and reduce fuel consumption. Would it surprise you to hear that General Motors has had similar technology on the market for over three years?
It's true. GM's first turbocharged, direct injected powerplants hit the market for the 2007 model. The 2.0-liter Ecotec mills put down an impressive 260 horsepower and a matching 260 pound-feet of torque, and they were lauded by the press in the engine bays of the Pontiac Solstice, Saturn Sky, Chevrolet Cobalt SS and Chevrolet HHR SS. But few people outside a core group of enthusiasts actually remember this fact.
Says Uwe Grebe, executive director of GM's global advanced engineering, "We didn't have a badge and say, 'This is the most important thing we will put on all our brochures.'" Ford, however, did just that, and it's EcoBoost engines are right at the tips of all our tongues when we discuss today's most advanced powerplants. So, how does The General fix its mistake?
Ford won't be releasing GT500 lap times for the 'Ring, or any other car
Wed, 27 Nov 2013Trucks have towing capacity, EVs have driving range and performance cars have Nürburgring lap times. What do all three have in common? They should all be taken with a grain of salt. Currently, there is no sanctioned way to record lap times or verify production-spec cars - a lesson we recently learned with the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo - and until there is a way to do so (and there probably never will be), we'll never officially know the actual time it took for Ford to lap the 'Ring with its ultra-powerful Shelby GT500.
After posting a Ford-made video of a 2013 GT500 running around the 'Ring, the guys over at SVTPerformance.com (an enthusiasts forum not affiliated with Ford or SVT) wanted more answers. They got in touch with Ford's Global Performance Vehicle Chief Engineer Jamal Hameedi, who said until there is a way to verify the times and inspect the cars, Ford will not get involved with lap-time wars. In the email, Hameedi pointed out that the 'Ring is a useful tool in that it allows a wide spectrum of track conditions, but until there is a governed way to record times, there is no way to accurately compare cars head-to-head.
And as much as some may not like it, Hameedi speaks the truth. It really isn't possible to compare times from one car to another, unless those cars were lapping the same track at the same time with the same driver. Not that any of this means there won't be continuous wars by fans and manufacturers alike... in other words, feel free to voice your opinions in the Comments below.