2006 Ford F350 Crew Cab Turbo Diesel 4x4 Runs Great on 2040-cars
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Body Type:Other
Engine:8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 205,179
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Side Airbags
Sub Model: XLT
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Blue
Number of Doors: 4
Interior Color: Other
Ford F-350 for Sale
**no reserve** 2002 ford lifted f350 dually lariat 7.3l diesel crew 4x4 - sharp
2006 ford f-350 lariat diesel fx4 4x4 lifted 20's 61k texas direct auto(US $24,780.00)
1 owner **7.3 powerstroke diesel** crew cab! fx4 4x4 with only 63,000 miles
2009 ford super duty f-350 srw lariat
2006 ford f-350 4x4 xlt dual rear wheel burgundy truck one owner 113k miles f350(US $20,000.00)
12 f350 diesel dually one owner extended cab clean low miles 4x4 tow package
Auto Services in Kansas
Shawnee Kawasaki Honda and Yamaha ★★★★★
S H A D Fleet Services Inc ★★★★★
Petersen`s Small Engine Repair ★★★★★
Parkway Service Center ★★★★★
Lowe Auto ★★★★★
Legacy Auto Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford dissects the heart of the 2015 Mustang, its engine range
Thu, 05 Dec 2013Happy Mustang Day. Are you tired of hearing about the 2015 Ford Mustang yet? No? Good, here's a bunch of mechanical data on Ford's sixth-gen muscle car, along with cutaways of the GT's 5.0-liter V8 and the new 2.3-liter, EcoBoost four-cylinder shown above. We also have a smattering of info on the Stang's updated transmissions and an exploded-parts-diagram view of its all-new independent rear suspension.
Ford is set to make waves offering the Mustang with a turbo for the firs time since the small-volume SVO of the 1980s. Displacing 2.3 liters, the engine's twin-scroll turbo should help the four-cylinder turn out a projected 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque, while also returning the best fuel economy in the Mustang's engine lineup. As we said in our Deep Dive, the EcoBoost will be slotted in as a premium engine, above the 3.7-liter V6 but below the 5.0-liter V8.
Speaking of that high-revving eight-cylinder, it's receiving a new cylinder head with high-flow ports. The intake and exhaust valves are larger and the cams have been replaced, among other tweaks. It should rev even higher thanks to a rebalanced crankshaft and forged connecting rods. Ford is still claiming a projected 420 hp and 390 lb-ft, although as many of the changes for the 2015's V8 come from the 2013 Boss 302, we're going to assume there's some sandbagging at work.
Xcar celebrates 100-year anniversary with Model T tribute
Fri, Jan 9 2015Never mind the fact that XCar hasn't been making videos for the last 100 years, the British duo have gone all silent-moving-pictures in order to make their centenary case for the Ford Model T, a car that was already seven years old in 1915. It's not a review, but a mostly sepia-tinged look at the car that started the mass-market adventure by taking that biblical advice to be fruitful and multiply and populate the Earth abundantly. Since it looks like Xcar is celebrating some kind of milestone, we've also included another video below of the first Xcar review we could find, covering the BMW M1, from the much more recent past - circa 2012.
Ford C-Max, Fusion hybrids subject of MPG lawsuit in California
Fri, 01 Mar 2013A California lawsuit over the fuel economy claims for the 2013 Ford C-Max was first reported back in December. Based on the numerous reports we've heard of disgruntled owners failing to get their car's EPA fuel economy ratings on the C-Max and 2013 Fusion Hybrid, we suspected there would be more to this story. The Detroit News is reporting that two California law firms are combining their lawsuits against Ford on this matter for "false and misleading" claims.
The article states that there are hundreds of C-Max and Fusion Hybrid owners who have joined the lawsuit, but the issue isn't limited to customers. In December, Consumer Reports extensively tested both the Fusion Hybrid and C-Max and found that both hybrids performed significantly worse than their EPA claims. This all comes just a few months after Hyundai and Kia took the unprecedented step of lowering the fuel economy ratings for all of their 2012 and 2013 model-year vehicles.
