No Reserve F150 F 150 Pickup Truck Super Crew Cab 4x4 4wd Cold A/c Runs Drives on 2040-cars
Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Model: F-150
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 116,919
Sub Model: KING RANCH
Options: Sunroof
Exterior Color: Burgundy
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Interior Color: Tan
Power Options: Power Windows
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford F-150 for Sale
- Supercrew xlt, 4-door 2wd pickup, topper
- 5.4l v8 4x4 xlt fx4 extended cab running boards tow package cd cruise control
- 2011 xlt 4x4 ecoboost 8k mi boards 1 texas owner sync net direct autos texas
- 60k 4x4 lariat navigation dual dvd sunroof leather heated seats 2008 ford f150(US $24,900.00)
- 2005 ford f-150 xlt 4dr extended cab 4x4 4wd 5.4l v8 auto low mileage(US $16,900.00)
- Rust free mint 2002 ford f-150 ext cab pickup v-8 auto one owner no reserve
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Wilcox Garage ★★★★★
Tint-Pro 3M ★★★★★
Sutliff Chevrolet ★★★★★
Steve`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang to offer solid-rear axle, sort of
Tue, 17 Dec 2013One of the biggest knocks against the last Ford Mustang was its solid-rear axle. Not one to actively court criticism, Ford dutifully swapped out the old-fashioned rear end for something a bit more modern in the redesigned 2015 Mustang, adding an independent rear suspension across the board.
While an IRS Mustang is great news for those that value handling and ride comfort, there's one big group that it's bad news for - drag racers. See, a solid-rear axle is a big deal for drag racers, because not only is it more durable and cheaper, but it's better for the hard launches that can make or break a race.
To satiate this vocal demographic, Ford will sell a body-in-white version of the Stang, complete with a nine-inch rear axle, that will debut at the 2014 Performance Racing Industry show. The news came from gas2.org, which cited an unnamed employee of Ford Racing at this year's PRI show.
Ford wins second consecutive Engine of the Year with 1.0L EcoBoost [UPDATE]
Wed, 05 Jun 2013For the second year in a row, Ford has taken top honors in International Engine of the Year voting. As was the case last year, it is Ford's 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine that earns the automaker the accolade, achieving the highest-ever accumulated score in the 15 years that the award has been handed out.
A panel of 87 automotive journalists from 35 countries are responsible for choosing the world's best engines, and this is only the third time an automaker has managed back-to-back victories. Voters were impressed by the "Baby EcoBoost" engine's power output - 123 horsepower between 1,400 and 4,500 rpm, 148 pound-feet of torque from 1,400 to 4,000 rpm - and its compact size; Ford has demonstrated that the package is small enough to fit in the overhead bin of a passenger airplane.
Currently, the 1.0-liter EcoBoost is offered in the European Fiesta, B-MAX, Focus, C-MAX and Grand C-MAX, and Ford plans to put the engine in the Transit Connect, Transit Courier, Tourneo Connect, Tourneo Courier, Mondeo and EcoSport in short order. In North America, the Fiesta will be the first vehicle to offer the 1.0L EcoBoost later this year.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.