1973 BMW 2002 COMPLETELY RESTORED SOLID BODY CALIFORNIA CAR WITH NO RUST NEW PAINT BLACK ELECTRONIC COGNITION(NO POINTS) NEW MACHINED HEAD AND NEW ALL GASKETS NEW PISTONS AND RINGS NEW ROD BEARINGS NEW MAIN BEARINGS SUSPENSION ALL AROUND NEW BRAKES FRONT AND REAR NEW BRAKE LINES NEW BRAKE BOOSTER REBUILT TRANSMISSION NEW RIMS AND TIERS 195'S REBUILD HEAD AND NEW GASKETS NEW WEBER CARB 32/36 NEW IE BLACK SILICON RADIATOR HOSES ALL THE DOOR SEALS AND WINDOW GASKETS ARE BRAND NEW NEW CARPETS NEW HEADLINER DASH HAS BEEN WARPED IN BLACK WITH DOUBLE STITCH MOMO STEERING WHEEL CUSTOM AIRDAM THERE IS A LOT MORE TO LIST.... WE HAVE THE RIGHTS TO CANCEL THIS AUCTION AT ANY TIME. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR OFFERS CONTACT ME ON EBAY. PLEASE HAVE YOUR FINANCES TOGETHER BEFORE BIDDING. HERE IS THE EBAY NUMBERS OF THE LAST THREE WE SOLD IN THEPAST TWO MONTHS. 231104192940 , 231125152820 AND 231146333248 |
BMW 2002 for Sale
- 1974 bmw 2002tii antique car runs great
- 1972 bmw 2002 tii(US $13,000.00)
- 1976 bmw 2002 california car
- 1976 bmw 2002 coupe, 39,926 actual miles, extremely original and unmodified!(US $22,900.00)
- 1971 bmw 2002 round tailight!! 4 speed clean title #s match needs work
- 1976 bmw 2002 base coupe 2-door 2.0l
Auto Services in Nevada
T C Auto ★★★★★
Royalty Auto Svc ★★★★★
Roadrunner Engine Parts ★★★★★
Rich Lathers Auto Spa ★★★★★
Platinum Kustomz ★★★★★
Planet Nissan ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 BMW X5 M is big and bold, not beautiful
Wed, 19 Nov 2014Awesome as it is, the BMW X5 M has never really been an attractive machine. Big and bulgy are the themes here, and that's only more pronounced with the X5's most recent refresh. But no matter, the X5 M has never been about looks - for this machine, it's all about performance, and BMW's hi-po crossover absolutely delivers in this regard.
Under the hood is the familiar 4.4-liter, twin-turbo V8, though power has been boosted to 567 horsepower and 553 pound-feet of torque - healthy increases of 12 and 53, respectively, compared to the outgoing model. Hitting 60 miles per hour is said to take just four seconds, which is damn impressive considering this thing weighs well over 5,000 pounds.
But the X5 M has always been shockingly good to drive, with limits you'll never reach except in the most hardcore track scenarios (which we'd really like to see, by the way). It's not the prettiest thing ever, but that's okay. It's not exactly cheap, though, with prices starting at $99,650. Woof.
BMW may keep next 1 Series out of the US
Tue, 07 May 2013As BMW prepares to introduce the all-new 2 Series coupe and convertible, the 1 Series name definitely won't be going away. We know new sedan and hatchback models are in the works; including the GT shown above. According to Car and Driver, though, the future of the 1 Series nameplate in the US could be dependent on rival premium small cars like the Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class and Audi A3.
In an interview with C/D, BMW's North American head of product planning and strategy, Paul Ferraiolo, said that pricing might be the biggest deterrent to offering the third-gen 1 Series in the US. As he points out, BMW currently prices the 1 not too far from the 3 Series, but Mercedes-Benz and Audi will have their new small cars priced well below the $30,000 mark. BMW's Mini brand will also factor into the consideration since the 1 GT will share its underpinnings with the next-gen Cooper lineup.
2015 BMW M3 Sedan
Tue, 20 May 2014BMW's all-new M3 Sedan is dynamically nearly identical to its two-door M4 Coupe sibling: a stopwatch reveals that both are sub-four-second cars to 60 miles per hour, a racetrack proves that the mechanical twins are equally as adept on a road course and a full afternoon of driving on public roads demonstrates that each possesses talented everyday adaptability.
Yet after driving both BMW models back-to-back over two full days in Portugal, it's clear there are a few noticeable differences, both objective and subjective, that don't require instrument testing to reveal. All it takes is a few hours behind the wheel of both cars to conclude that one is slightly more agile, and the other a bit more twitchy. One has better outward visibility, while its counterpart is unquestionably more convenient.
It is the little things - subtleties attained through seat-of-the-pants observations - that eventually allow me to choose a favorite.