Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1987 Toyota Van Wagon Like Vw Vanagon Syncro Awd 4wd W/transfercase No Reserve!! on 2040-cars

Year:1987 Mileage:281000 Color: Brown /
 Brown
Location:

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.2
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: JT3YR36W7H0002883 Year: 1987
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Toyota
Model: Previa
Trim: Van LE
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 281,000
Sub Model: LE
Exterior Color: Brown
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Brown
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Cruise and AC doesn't work. See pictures, would be a great ski bum van, 4WD works, has brand new General Grabbers (Really good offroad tires, probably great in the snow). Has an exhaust leak, has some rust. Runs and drives, it's a Toyota, they go forever..."

1987 Toyota LE Van, Has the ability to haul 7 passengers (has seating for seven).   Has a wooden platform bed that you can remove the back seats and use as a camper van.   


Have too many vehicles, need to sell a few to pay bills, also have a 1948 Dodge Pickup Truck and a 1978 Toyota Dolphin, Westfalia circus tent that connects to the side of a VW Bus Camper Van, please see my other listings.   Also have a Westfalia circus tentEmail any questions to yellowstonewesty@gmail.com

Auto Services in Idaho

The Shop 24/7 ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 119 K Street, Kingston
Phone: (208) 209-5461

Robinson Auto Glass Experts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair
Address: 495 1st St, Rigby
Phone: (208) 534-9974

Palouse Country Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 1420 E White Ave, Moscow
Phone: (208) 882-2667

Merwin`s Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Towing
Address: Worley
Phone: (208) 772-7327

McCall Glass Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 163 Thula St, Lake-Fork
Phone: (208) 634-1911

Lett`s Downtown Car Wash & Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 1114 N 3rd St, Hayden-Lake
Phone: (208) 666-0836

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

GM outsold VW globaly in first quarter, Toyota reports numbers next week

Thu, 18 Apr 2013

General Motors released its first quarter sales figures this week, reporting that it sold 2.36 million cars and trucks worldwide. That figure represents an increase of 3.6 percent when compared to the same period last year. GM's growth was attributed to many factors, including global Cadillac sales that were up 26 percent and Chevrolet posting a one percent increase over last year (this marked Chevy's tenth straight year of record global sales).
Volkswagen came in just behind GM, as the German automaker reported global sales from January through March at 2.27 million vehicles, an increase of five percent when compared to last year. While that number was strong, VW is cautioning that markets outside China and the US, such as those in Europe, are becoming a challenge as economies falter.
Yet to report sales is Toyota, current holder of the global world sales crown (the Japanese company sold 9.75 million cars last year, against 9.29 million sold by GM and 9.1 million vehicles sold by VW). Even though GM and Toyota both say they don't care who sells the most units, it is unquestionably a strong bragging point and sales equate to revenue. That said, Toyota will report its first quarter numbers next week.

2019 Subaru Forester vs compact SUV rivals: How they compare on paper

Mon, Aug 20 2018

We've seen what the 2019 Subaru Forester looks like (pretty much the same). We've found out how much it's going to cost (just a bit more). And also how much bigger and more powerful it'll be (appreciably on both counts). Now it's time to see how all of that compares to its top compact SUV rivals. While you can see the same engine and dimension specs for every compact SUV here, for this comparison featuring the latest 2019 Forester info, we've decided to define "top rivals" as those that the 2018 model was most frequently cross-shopped with. That means the 2018 Honda CR-V, 2018 Toyota RAV4, 2018 Mazda CX-5 and 2018 Nissan Rogue. At the time of this writing, none of their respective manufacturers had released data for 2019 models. We also included info for the 2018 Forester as well. So, without further blather, cue the Spreadsheet-o-Matic 3000. How big are they? The 2019 Forester may look nearly identical to the compact crossover it replaces, but it's nevertheless bigger and heavier. In particular, its wheelbase has increased from being the smallest in the segment to one that's pretty much average. It's a good bet that this gain is the reason rear seat legroom has also increased. Width is also up, but the Forester actually remains the narrowest compact SUV. As for other noteworthy dimensions, the new Forester now has the most maximum cargo capacity of any compact SUV with 76.1 cubic feet. Now, it should be noted, that's without the panoramic sunroof that comes on all but the base model. With it, max capacity shrinks to 70.9 cu-ft. Two points about that. First, Subaru is the only company that calls out this difference, and all the others almost certainly are not measuring with a sunroof. Second, this gives you an idea about how much of "maximum cargo capacity" includes space up high where you're probably not storing much cargo. As such, we included the Forester's biggest number and think it fairly indicates Subaru should carry the "biggest in segment" crown. How do their engines and fuel economy compare? Here's the most important takeaway here: The new Forester is tied for the best fuel economy in the segment, but that's with standard all-wheel drive. Everything else listed above is with front-wheel drive. The 2019 model also gets a welcome injection of power, resulting in the fourth-most base horsepower in the segment (or fifth, if you consider the CR-V technically holds spots 1 and 3).