Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Saturn 4 Door on 2040-cars

Year:2002 Mileage:84706
Location:

Folsom, Pennsylvania, United States

Folsom, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:

 

2002 Saturn 4 door sl2

Our car has 84706 gentle miles on it.

No surprises with this car, check engine light is not on.

Tires are almost new as are the brakes.

Pa inspected till December.

Looks and runs very strong.

Family car since brand new.

Low mileage with many more miles to go.

The only negative things I can disclose is the tires are a little noisy even being almost new, and there is a part of the headliner in the back that is lose.

The key fob is also not working, might just need new battery.

With a little TLC surly to bring years of driving enjoyment to some lucky bidder.

That being said, I would like to make this an as is where is action, for convenience to myself, and based on the year of the car.

Not much else to add, buy it and drive away, easy, nice car and surly will go for a great price.

Starting the auction low so all can enjoy bidding.

We need to make room for our new Jeep, coming soon.

Good luck and happy bidding.

Car location zip code is 19033, very close to philly and the blueroute I 476

My email is waynejourney1@gmail.com


 

 

 

  

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

West Penn Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 10479 Route 6N, West-Springfield
Phone: (814) 756-4464

Wallace Towing & Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Towing
Address: Hilliards
Phone: (724) 452-4200

Truck Accessories by TruckAmmo ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Accessories
Address: 3227 Perkiomen Ave, Goodville
Phone: (877) 612-6341

Town Service Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tires-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Tire Dealers
Address: Lincoln-University
Phone: (610) 857-3585

Tom`s Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Leasing, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 75 Fowler St, Dingmans-Ferry
Phone: (845) 858-2755

Stottsville Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 1991 Valley Rd, Intercourse
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

US database may have overstated deaths in GM ignition switch recall

Fri, Mar 14 2014

The FARS analysis didn't take into account fatal accidents where the airbags weren't supposed to deploy. Earlier today, we reported that the actual death toll attributable to GM's ignition switch problem had crested the 300 mark according to new research, well up from the original reports of 12 to 13 deaths. Now, word is breaking that the US government database that informed the study that the report was based on may have significantly overstated the correlation between the study and the GM recall. The initial study was conducted by Friedman Research on behalf of the Center for Auto Safety, and used something called the US Fatality Analysis Reporting System. To recap, the study claimed that over a 10-year period, 303 people were killed in Chevrolet Cobalt and Saturn Ion coupes and sedans when their airbags failed to deploy. These undeployed airbags were then linked to GM's ignition switch recall, which as we've explained before, can turn the ignition out of the "run" position and into the "off" or "accessory" position, disabling the airbags in the process. Now, according to a report from The Detroit News, which cites research from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the National Study Center for Trauma and EMS at the University of Maryland, the FARS analysis didn't take into account fatal accidents in conditions where the airbags weren't supposed to deploy (which isn't to say crashes and deaths weren't caused by loss of control from the ignition switching off in the GM vehicles). According to the report, this was a significant number of the cases. There is another potential problem, too. According to that same report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration uses both FARS and another database on fatalities, called the National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS). Where FARS uses what the DetNews calls "not always reliable" police data to record vehicular deaths within 30 days of a crash, NASS/CDS relies on what's known as a probability sample. It collects data on 5,000 crashes each year – including some found in the FARS database – to calculate a probability figure. According to a 2009 IIHS study, "Among crashes common to both databases, NASS/CDS reported deployments for 45 percent of front occupant deaths for which FARS had coded nondeployments." In plain English, FARS doesn't provide a reliable count airbag deployments.

GM issues four new recalls, 2.4 million cars affected

Tue, 20 May 2014

General Motors has announced another set of recalls, covering some 2.42 million cars in the United States. For those keeping track, The General has now recalled over 15 million cars worldwide this year due to various issues.
Here's the breakdown for this most recent set of recalls:
1,339,355 - Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia models from the 2009 to 2014 model years; Saturn Outlook models from the 2009 to 2010 model years

GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect

Tue, 17 Aug 2010

2010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.