Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Mercury Villager Base Mini Passenger Van 3-door 3.3l on 2040-cars

US $2,350.00
Year:2001 Mileage:143000 Color: White
Location:

Madison Heights, Michigan, United States

Madison Heights, Michigan, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.3L 3275CC V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 4M2ZV11T31DJ07202 Year: 2001
Mileage: 143,000
Make: Mercury
Exterior Color: White
Model: Villager
Trim: Base Mini Passenger Van 3-Door
Options: Cassette Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Number of Cylinders: 6
Power Options: Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"A few dings and scratches on some areas. A key to unlock doors is missing which can be obtained from a locksmith for $75. A hinge on rear glass window is missing. Otherwise, this is a reliable vehicle with good gas mileage. Asking $2,350 Or Best Offer."

 A new battery was installed with (2 year free replacement). Also, a new oil change was performed good for 3,000 miles. Two used tires were added (front passenger, rear driver). It has 143,000 miles with a V6, 3.3L engine by (nissan motors).

Auto Services in Michigan

Zielke Tires & Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 7446 lincoln ave, Hagar-Shores
Phone: (269) 429-6051

Your Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 5910 Spring Arbor Rd, Horton
Phone: (517) 750-4611

Victory Motors ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 517 N Main St, Bloomfield-Hills
Phone: (248) 556-5450

Tireman Central Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7725 Tireman St, Grosse-Pointe-Park
Phone: (313) 544-6361

Thomas Auto Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 1530 N Leroy St, Springfield-Township
Phone: (810) 714-5191

Tel-Ford Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 6570 N Telegraph Rd, Wayne
Phone: (734) 237-1767

Auto blog

NHTSA investigating Ford's solution to May 2014 power steering recall

Tue, Apr 7 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating a complaint that Ford's response to a May 2014 recall of the 2008 to 2011 Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner doesn't quite go far enough to solve a troubling power-steering problem. Roughly a year ago, Ford recalled nearly a million vehicles after it was found that a problem with the torque sensor's communication with the power steering control module could cut steering assistance for drivers. While manual steering would still be available, the problem was enough to ask drivers to report in to have the PSCM inspected, and if necessary, replaced (along with the torque sensor, or in dramatic cases, the entire steering column). That would only happen, though, if trouble codes were being thrown. If there weren't any problems, dealers were told to simply update the PSCM's software so that any issues between it and the torque sensor would simply throw a visual and audio warning – power steering would still be maintained. The petitioner claimed that following the recall work, he still experienced a problem with the torque sensor. According to NHTSA, a claim was made that Ford didn't go far enough in its solution to the problem, and that "the software update itself may in fact cause further issues with the affected vehicle's power steering, causing it to fail, and ultimately requiring replacement of the torque sensor or entire steering column." The petition was filed in early February and is now officially being looked into by NHTSA.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

Has the Mercury Marauder gotten better with age?

Fri, Oct 23 2015

In the early 2000s Mercury desperately wanted to develop some edge for its brand – seemingly stuck between a quasi-premium, quasi-performance space in the Ford Universe. The Marauder is perhaps the most famous of the vehicles that resulted from those efforts, and is rapidly approaching Modern Classic status, today. Effectively a murdered out Grand Marquis with some updated trim pieces – what are company parts bins for, if not raiding? – the Marauder looked convincingly like a bad guy car. The 4.6-liter V8 under its hood that had been breathed on by engineers for a little more power, kicking out 302 horsepower and 318 pound-feet of torque from the factory. Not exactly Ferrari-baiting numbers, but it'd give your local cop's car a run for its money. Being a wild child of the last decade, of course our friends at MotorWeek had it on the program. What better way to test your mean-mugging muscle sedan than with John Davis' tanned and steady hands?