Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Mercury Cougar Eliminator 428 Cj on 2040-cars

Year:1969 Mileage:59768
Location:

Dunstable, Massachusetts, United States

Dunstable, Massachusetts, United States
Advertising:

1969 Mercury Cougar Eliminator 428 CJ

  • Factory 4 Speed
  • Real R Code Car
  • This Car Looks Great!

This car is also listed for sale locally, Auction could end without notice. Please no emails or text - Call Matt for more info 1-978-375-0014

 photo IMG_6565_zpsdbeaaafe.jpg  photo IMG_6566_zpsa2909778.jpg  photo IMG_6568_zps99b83805.jpg  photo IMG_6572_zps8b3175d1.jpg  photo IMG_6570_zps2a28ddf7.jpg  photo IMG_6571_zpsfd0c8d66.jpg  photo IMG_6575_zps1b99971c.jpg  photo IMG_6576_zps210810bc.jpg  photo IMG_6557_zps2b43df91.jpg  photo IMG_6560_zps1c854c22.jpg  photo IMG_6559_zpsf4f9d138.jpg  photo IMG_6561_zps31c8a4a3.jpg  photo IMG_6562_zps91ddcc87.jpg  photo IMG_6578_zps3fcd311e.jpg  photo IMG_6579_zpsd23e267e.jpg  photo IMG_6580_zpsa00a2b1d.jpg  photo IMG_6581_zps5efd366a.jpg  photo IMG_6582_zpse16b1663.jpg  photo IMG_6583_zpsed049821.jpg  photo IMG_6587_zpsdd37d05c.jpg  photo IMG_6588_zps06e1bf72.jpg  photo IMG_6585_zps85083f4a.jpg  photo IMG_6594_zpsb4090e9c.jpg  photo IMG_6592_zps6271b86e.jpg  photo IMG_6593_zpsf32739a9.jpg  photo IMG_6567_zps73bbb633.jpg  photo IMG_6595_zps78d79b9c.jpg  photo IMG_6596_zps05e68634.jpg  photo IMG_6597_zpsb27cb66b.jpg  photo IMG_6599_zpsec416215.jpg  photo IMG_6598_zps8952a7a6.jpg  photo IMG_6601_zps352e2aec.jpg  photo IMG_6602_zpsfc7d50f6.jpg  photo IMG_6604_zps775a4a4a.jpg  photo IMG_6606_zps184a419c.jpg  photo ScreenShot2014-04-03at50427PM_zps2bb2df52.png  photo IMG_6568_zps99b83805.jpg

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Tiny & Sons Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 237 Washington St, North-Weymouth
Phone: (888) 648-4697

Tint King Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting
Address: 505 Middlesex Tpke Unit# 22, South-Weymouth
Phone: (978) 670-2927

The Weymouth Auto Mall ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 25 Main St, South-Weymouth
Phone: (781) 335-4400

R & R Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 737 Broadway, Jamaica-Plain
Phone: (781) 289-2160

Quirk Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 280 Quincy Ave, North-Pembroke
Phone: (781) 917-1401

Post Road Used Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Parts & Supplies-Used & Rebuilt-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: Ashby
Phone: (508) 485-1414

Auto blog

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.

Junkyard Gem: 1971 Mercury Comet 2-Door Sedan

Sat, Sep 10 2022

When Ford introduced the original Maverick for the 1970 model year, Dearborn tradition required that a Mercury-badged version be created. That car ended up being the Comet, built from the 1971 through 1977 model years. Here's one of those first-year Comets in rough but recognizable condition, found in a Denver self-service yard not long ago. The Comet name had spent the 1960s affixed to the flanks of Mercurized Ford Falcons (1960-1965) and Fairlanes (1966-1969). Since the Maverick was the successor of the Falcon — sales of which went into an irrecoverable downward spiral once its sportier Mustang first cousin hit the streets — it made sense to move the Comet name over to the Mercury version. Nearly every American Mercury model ever sold was a U.S.-market Ford model with a different name and some gingerbread slapped on. Notable exceptions to this tradition include the 1999-2002 Mercury Cougar (mechanically based on the Contour but with a unique body) and the 1991-1994 Mercury Capri (an Australian-built mashup of Mazda components borrowed from the Ford Laser). The Comet was by far the cheapest Mercury model available in 1971, though it was considered more prestigious than its Maverick counterpart. The price tag on the '71 Comet two-door sedan started at $2,217 (about $16,505 in 2022 dollars), while the '71 Maverick two-door sedan cost $2,175 ($16,193 today). Meanwhile, AMC would sell you a new Hornet two-door sedan for one dollar less than a Maverick, Chevrolet had the Nova coupe for a dollar more than the Maverick, and Plymouth offered the Valiant Duster for $2,313 ($17,220 now). Toyota had a Maverick competitor as well that year, with the Corona at $2,150 for the sedan and $2,310 for the coupe. Having driven every one of the aforementioned models, I'd take the Duster if I went back in time and had to choose one (as a 1969 Corona owner, I'm not a fan of the 1971 facelift, though the Corona's build quality beats the Duster's). The build sticker on this car tells us that it was built at the Kansas City Assembly Plant (where Transits and F-150s are made today) and sold through the Los Angeles district sales office (there was a DSO in Denver, so it's a near-certainty that this car didn't start out in Colorado). The paint started out as Bright Blue Metallic (it's neither bright nor metallic 51 years down the road) and the interior was done up in Medium Blue Cloth & Vinyl.

Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch

Tue, 16 Jul 2013

A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.