Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1997 Ford Taurus Gl Sedan 4-door 3.0l on 2040-cars

Year:1997 Mileage:141000 Color: Green /
 Gray
Location:

Englishtown, New Jersey, United States

Englishtown, New Jersey, United States
Advertising:
Engine:3.0L 182Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FALP52U8VA270848 Year: 1997
Mileage: 141,000
Make: Ford
Sub Model: GL
Model: Taurus
Exterior Color: Green
Trim: GL Sedan 4-Door
Interior Color: Gray
Drive Type: FWD
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 6
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Very dependable transportation but I just got a new car instead of putting money into this one.  Just took it to the shop because it lost power.  Mechanic said it needed a new alternator, it also has a crack in the bottom of the windshield and the speedometer has to be replaced.  I was quoted $200 for the speedometer which caused a drain.  Unfortunately the odometer and radio work off the same fuse as the speedometer so it's all one fix.  Not a bad car at all if you have a few hundred to put into it.  Starts and drives however the battery will drain without a new alternator.  Cash payment on pick up in Manalapan NJ.    

Auto Services in New Jersey

World Class Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 338 S Governor Printz Blvd, Paulsboro
Phone: (610) 521-4650

Warren Wylie & Sons ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2 Red Hill Rd, Sussex
Phone: (973) 293-8185

W & W Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 550 S Oxford Valley Rd, Delran
Phone: (215) 946-3550

Union Volkswagen ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 2155 US Highway 22 W, Fanwood
Phone: (908) 687-8000

T`s & Son Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 880 Route 9 N, Long-Beach-Township
Phone: (609) 294-1500

South Shore Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: 311 S Main St, Ship-Bottom
Phone: (609) 597-9964

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Pony cars, trucks and Italian SUVs | Autoblog Podcast #552

Fri, Aug 31 2018

On this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Senior Editor Alex Kierstein and Associate Editor Reese Counts. We discuss the updated 2019 Chevy Camaro Turbo 1LE variant, the new 2019 GMC Sierra Denali, and the Ferrari-powered Maserati Levante GTS. We also debate whether Volkswagen should build the Atlas-based Tanoak pickup truck and what a delay means for the next-gen Ford Mustang. Finally, we answer a reader question about the state of Lexus.Autoblog Podcast #552 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown 2019 Chevy Camaro Turbo 1LE 2019 GMC Sierra 2019 Maserati Levante GTS Should Volkswagen build the Tanoak? Next-gen Ford Mustang delayed The past, present and future of Lexus Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Podcasts Chevrolet Ford GM GMC Lexus Maserati RAM Truck Coupe SUV Luxury Performance

Reborn Ford Escort could make its way to Europe

Fri, 26 Apr 2013

The Ford Escort concept just unveiled at the Shanghai Motor Show was created with the Chinese market in mind, but it's got people talking all over the world. Not purely fancy, the point of the Escort concept was to give Chinese buyers a preview of what they could expect to see in a Ford showroom in the near future. If Ford wasn't seriously considering the new Escort for other countries, a report in Auto Express indicates that the concept's reception has changed all that.
No less than the incoming chairman of Ford UK said "it could work in other places," bolstering the comments of "a senior Ford insider" who said the question of bringing the car to Europe to slot in underneath the Focus had been raised. That's a long way from anything of the kind happening, which would require Ford to figure out how to sell it for the right price and not torpedo the company reputation among Euro buyers. In any case, we'd be as intrigued as anyone if an Escort resurrection created the next 'who knew?' market segment of few-frills transportation offered by non-Asian carmakers.