Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Ford Ranger Xlt 4x4, Extended Cab Pickup 4.0l, Only 85k Miles on 2040-cars

US $7,600.00
Year:2002 Mileage:85000 Color: Gold /
 Tan
Location:

Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Extended Cab Pickup
Engine:4.0L 245Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Owner
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1ftzr45e92pb41037
Year: 2002
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Trim: XLT Extended Cab Pickup 4-Door
Warranty: Unspecified
Drive Type: 4WD
Options: Running Boards, Sliding Rear Window, Tilt Wheel, 4-Door Supercab, Kenwood Stereo, Spray-in Bedliner, Keyless Entry
Mileage: 85,000
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Sub Model: XLT
Power Options: 4.0L V-6, 4-Wheel Drive, 4X4, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Gold
Interior Color: Tan

2002 Ford Ranger XLT 4X4; Four door Supercab Pickup. Only 85,000 Miles. 4.0 Liter V6, automatic, 4WD selectable, AC, sliding rear window, power windows, power locks, cruise control, tilt wheel, upgraded Kenwood stereo deck(mp3, AUX, Iphone, Pandora, XM capable), running boards, nice bed liner, steel wheels.

This is a really nice little truck, clean interior, upgraded deck, aftermarket spray in bed liner, solid 4.0 liter V6, four-wheel drive to keep you from getting stuck up

Marked below the Kelley Blue Book private party fair-condition price; trying to help a little with buyers cost to pick up/possibly ship. I bought the truck with a few minor hail spots, and a ding down the right side that I never got around to fixing... was no problem for me, this is a great little truck.

Auto Services in South Carolina

West Specialty Products Used Cars ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Financing Services
Address: 1230 Gentry Memorial Hwy, Pickens
Phone: (864) 442-0410

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 9909 Charlotte Hwy, Catawba
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Star Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 3102 N Pleasantburg Dr, Greenville
Phone: (864) 846-9524

Stack`s Wholesale Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Auto Body Parts
Address: 7307 Charleston Hwy, Bowman
Phone: (803) 829-3488

Scott`s Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 931 Central Ave, Summerville
Phone: (843) 875-1708

Reid`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Repossessing Service
Address: 10117 John Price Rd, Lake-Wylie
Phone: (704) 208-9192

Auto blog

Are you a new Ford Mustang SVO? [w/video]

Fri, 16 May 2014

When Ford announced that its 2015 Mustang would arrive with a 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine, three letters came to mind: SVO. While Ford hasn't said a word regarding the rebirth of a Mustang SVO model, this latest set of spy shots shows us something very, very interesting. Allow us to explain.
The Mustang prototype in these photos looks very similar to the GT500 test cars we've spotted before - same bulging hood, aggressive front fascia and air vents aft of the front wheels. What's different, however, is around back. Have a look at the exhaust, and note that instead of the GT500's usual quad pipes, two of the exhaust outlets have been capped off.
Our spies point out that these exhaust outlets could be closed for some sort of emissions testing or another engineering reason, but it's also important to note that the engine and exhaust notes of this car sound completely different from earlier GT500 prototypes. We've got a video below that compares the two.

Again? Ford issues second 2015 Fusion and Lincoln MKZ seat belt recall

Fri, Aug 16 2019

In 2016, Ford issued a recall for 603,392 2013-2016 Fusions and 2013-2015 Lincoln MKZs due to potentially faulty seat belts. Apparently, that wasn't the end of it. Ford announced another recall this week for the same issue, this time covering 108,399 2015 Fusions and MKZs.  In both cases, the seat belt anchor pretensioners are the issue. According to Ford, "increased temperatures generated during deployment of the driver or front-passenger seat belt anchor pretensioner could degrade the tensile strength of the cable below the level needed to restrain an occupant." Basically, heat could weaken the seat belts, and in extreme cases, they wouldn't be able to keep up proper safety standards. Ford knows of at least one injury that has occurred due to this issue.   The recall includes 103,374 vehicles in the United States, 4,002 in Canada, and 1,023 in Mexico. Possibly affected Fusions were built at Ford's Flat Rock Assembly Plant between August 1, 2014 and January 30, 2015. The MKZs were built at the Hermosillo Assembly Plant between August 1, 2014 and November 21, 2014.  As a fix, Ford says dealers will add an extra coating to the seat belt pretensioner cable for protection from the heat. If this recall might affect your vehicle, call your local Ford dealership and use recall reference No. 19S25. This news comes after Ford recalled 1.3 million Fusions and MKZs in 2018 due to the possibility that the steering wheels could fall off. Fusions have also been recalled due to the risk of rolling away.

2019 Chevy Silverado 1500 vs. 2019 Ram 1500 vs. 2018 Ford F-150: How they compare

Mon, Jan 15 2018

The full-size pickup truck market is seriously hot right now. Both Ram and Chevrolet have introduced completely redesigned trucks, the 2019 Ram 1500 and the 2019 Chevy Silverado, and as the companies slowly roll each one out, more and more information comes to light. We've put together this comparison post to help you keep track of all the features and specifications of each of these new models, along with the updated 2018 Ford F-150. Among the stats we'll take a look at are engines, power, fuel economy, trim levels, weight and more. Weight savings Both the 2019 Ram 1500 and 2019 Chevy Silverado 1500 have gone on a diet for the new model year, similar to the one the F-150 went on in 2015. The Silverado is the weight-loss leader, having shed 450 pounds when comparing quad-cab V8 models. The Ram 1500 lost 225 pounds compared to the current truck. Both trucks achieve their weight loss in part due to the use of aluminum parts. On the Silverado, the hood, doors, and tailgate are aluminum, while on the Ram, just the hood and tailgate are aluminum on the body. Compare that to the F-150, which uses aluminum for all exterior body panels for a total weight loss of up to 732 pounds, which makes the aluminum-intensive F-150 the weight-loss leader. View 160 Photos Engines and transmissions There's only a bit of overlap in powertrains on the Ram 1500 and Chevy Silverado. Each has a V8 for the top engine. The Ram's is a 5.7-liter Hemi V8 making 395 horsepower and 410 pound-feet of torque. The Silverado will once again use a 6.2-liter V8 as its range topper with the same 420 horsepower and 460 pound-feet of torque as the current model. Both of these V8s boast some extra fuel saving technology. The Chevy's 6.2-liter (and some 5.3-liters) comes with the company's latest cylinder deactivation system that can shut off any or nearly all of the eight cylinders. The Ram's V8 boasts an optional 48-volt mild-hybrid system that, in addition to likely helping fuel economy, can provide up to 130 pound-feet of torque right off the line. With the Ram, fuel economy sees an improvement of 2 mpg in the city and combined ratings for 17 and 19 respectively. Highway fuel economy improves by 1 mpg to 23 with two-wheel drive and 22 with four-wheel drive. The Silverado's 6.2-liter V8 only improves city fuel economy by 1 mpg to 16, and actually loses 1 mpg on the highway. The new 5.3-liter engine with the fancy cylinder deactivation does see an improvement over the simpler version.