Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Ford Fusion Sel Sedan V6 3.0l on 2040-cars

US $8,500.00
Year:2009 Mileage:142903 Color: upkeep
Location:

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Advertising:

The Good:
  • I purchased this vehicle in 2009 with 20K miles. I am the second owner. I purchased from the local Chevy dealership as a certified pre-owned. 
  • This car has 142k miles currently, primarily highway, since I was traveling around TN and AR for my company. 
  • The adherence to the regular scheduled maintenance on this vehicle has been taken very seriously. All oil changes (Full Synthetic), system maintenance and tire purchases/rotations have been thoroughly documented. 

The same meticulous care has been given to the interior and exterior upkeep. 
  • This is a smoke free, pet free car. 
  • The cabin trim is extremely comfortable and quiet. It has all leather seats, with heated driver and passenger seats. 
  • The car is equipped with Microsoft's SYNC technology, which means you will be able to connect your smartphone via Bluetooth and USB interfaces. The voice activated commands allow you to navigate music, phone calls, and GPS directions. 
  • The speakers that deliver this technology are extremely satisfying! I typically upgrade my autos stock stereo systems and was prepared to do so on this car, but when I first heard the sound quality of this Fusion, I was instantly satisfied, and impressed. Rich bass, definitive highs, along with speed volume control make this auto system enjoyable to use everyday. 
  • The buttons and controls on this model are all so intuitively placed and operation of features like cruise control, sunroof, temperature control, and radio are all made extremely simple and convenient. The cruise control is sensitive and accurate. 

Other trim amenities include: 
  • Plently of cup holders.
  • 12V power adapters in both the dash and the armrest. USB charging and interface in the armrest. 
  • Trunk access from back seats allows for a large increase in cargo space. 
  • All of the floor mats are present and in good condition. I also use seasonal all weather mats during the winter months. 

Bottom line, this car has been one of the most reliable, and enjoyable vehicles I have ever owned. There have not been any major mechanical issues. Brakes are solid still. Tires are about 2/3 through their life. Interior and exterior aesthetics have been carefully maintained.

The Bad:

I have had the front bumper professional repainted using the OEM color because of an accumulation of chips and scratches from road debris. 
I have to replace the front left headlamp assembly because it has started to accumulate moisture. 
The driver seat is beginning to show its wear through minor cracks in the leather. 


Auto Services in Wisconsin

Zinecker`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 10315 N Port Washington Rd, Mequon
Phone: (262) 241-4636

Wilson Collision Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 750 Hansen Rd, Hobart
Phone: (920) 499-7000

Van Linn`s ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 540 N Oneida St, Grand-Chute
Phone: (920) 574-9644

Tuff Enuff Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 2093 County Road Z, Friendship
Phone: (608) 339-3799

Scotts Automotive Pewaukee ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 118 Sussex St, Pewaukee
Phone: (262) 696-4510

Schok`s Autobody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 5701 W Burleigh St, Shorewood
Phone: (414) 873-9944

Auto blog

Hennessey completes first VelociRaptor SUV conversion [w/video]

Mon, 20 May 2013

Start with a Ford F-150 SVT Raptor as your base vehicle for modification, and chances are high that you'll end up with something pretty cool. Now, have those modifications done by professional lunatics Hennessey Performance, make the project turning the pickup into an ultra-long SUV, and the result stands a real chance of being a total kick in the ass. Let us present the Hennessey VelociRaptor then, in all of its awesomeness.
Hennessey has taken care in grafting a "Expedition style" rear cabin onto the Raptor, complete with an optional third row. The pictures we have show a cabin that's up to the fit and finish standards of the original Ford truck, too. The cab added over the bed also makes room for a massive load space out back, accessible via split out-folding doors and long enough for a person to lay down in (see video).
Mechanically, the truck-turned-SUV sticks with Ford's stock 6.2-liter V8, rated at 411 horsepower, or can be had with a supercharger and some 600 hp. Hennessey says the stock-motor VelociRaptor will run from 0-60 miles per hour in 7.5 seconds, while the hi-po version takes just 5.9 seconds. The SUV does take some of the off-road ability away from the Raptor, with the company saying it hasn't yet had the opportunity to test its capabilities. On-roading and "moderate off-road duties" are the current prescription.

2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. midsize crossovers and SUVs: How they compare on paper

Fri, Mar 30 2018

In a world full of SUVs and crossovers all competing for similar buyers in similar segments, there are still some models that find their own little niches that lack such fevered fighting. The Jeep Grand Cherokee is one of those vehicles. It's an oddball in the sense that it's a midsize crossover SUV with a unibody chassis and independent suspension, but it still uses rear-wheel-drive and four-wheel-drive systems and has some off-road capability. It's also a midsize crossover, but only offers two rows of seats. Despite the Grand Cherokee's odd nature, we did come up with a few crossovers and a classic SUV that seem to match the Jeep in size and pricing. We looked at the numbers to compare them on paper. You can find the raw data in the chart below and deeper analysis after that. As always, this is just a comparison of specifications and you'll want to check out our driving impressions of each car if you're getting serious about one or all of these vehicles. And if you want to compare any of these against other vehicles, be sure to check out our comparison tool. Engines and Drivetrains When comparing base engines, the Jeep Grand Cherokee's 295-horsepower is the clear power winner, beating the next most powerful 4Runner by 25. But in torque, the 4Runner takes the laurels with 278 pound-feet, narrowly edging out the Edge's (no pun intended) turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder's 275. That four-cylinder in the Edge will also be picking up another 5 horsepower for 2019, but it still won't win this power contest. Both Ford and Jeep also have another advantage in the fact that you don't have to settle for the base powertrain. Ford has two other engine options, a naturally aspirated V6 and a twin-turbocharged V6, the latter of which outguns the Grand Cherokee's gasoline V6 in both power and torque. That engine will also be bumped up to an impressive 335 horsepower and 385 pound-feet of torque. View 20 Photos The Jeep has the most engine options, though, and it's the only to offer V8 and diesel options. On most Grand Cherokees, the options include a 5.7-liter V8, which is only available with 4WD. It makes 360 horsepower and 390 pound-feet of torque, outperforming even the 2019 Edge's twin-turbo V6. The diesel engine doesn't make much power with just 240, but it makes up for it with torque at 420 pound-feet. And of course there are the SRT and SRT Trackhawk models with even bigger and supercharged V8 engines respectively.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.