Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Ford F250 Super Duty on 2040-cars

US $14,995.00
Year:2006 Mileage:96842 Color: Brown /
 Tan
Location:

810 Nicola Lane, OFallon, Missouri, United States

810 Nicola Lane, OFallon, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.4L V8 24V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTSX21576ED30143
Stock Num: STL-30143
Make: Ford
Model: F250 Super Duty
Year: 2006
Exterior Color: Brown
Interior Color: Tan
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Diameter of tires: 17.0"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.4"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.4"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.0"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Manual locking hubs
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power steering
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 38.2"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 32.2"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Split rear bench
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 96842

Auto Services in Missouri

Wright Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 109 James St, Ferrelview
Phone: (816) 532-8982

Wilson auto repair & 24-HR towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: Watson
Phone: (816) 752-7357

Waggoner Motor Co ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers
Address: 408 E Kearney St, Willard
Phone: (417) 866-2229

Vanzandt?ˆ™s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 N Grant Ave, Springfield
Phone: (417) 881-0101

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4724 Hampton Ave, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 352-5900

Todd`s & Mark`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 1219 Caseyville Ave, Saint-Louis
Phone: (618) 233-9923

Auto blog

Least reliable cars and trucks of 2022

Tue, Nov 15 2022

Related: Most reliable cars and trucks of 2022   Every year, Consumer Reports ranks new cars based on their predicted reliability. We often see Toyota, Lexus, and a few other automakers near the top. But on the other side of the coin, the list of least reliable vehicles sometimes contains surprises.   The organization surveys its members to determine the vehicles that exhibited the most problems over the prior year. Owners are asked about creaks and rattles, the durability of parts and trim, and mechanical issues. Consumer Reports assigns a weight to each problem and then uses them to create a score, with 100 being the best. Some familiar names appear on the list of least reliable vehicles (in order with the lowest predicted reliability score at the top), but there are a few eyebrow-raising models, followed by CR's score: Ford F-150 Hybrid: 4 Hyundai Kona Electric: 5 Lincoln Aviator: 8 Nissan Sentra: 9 Ford Explorer: 16 Chevrolet Bolt: 17 Chevrolet Silverado 1500/GMC Sierra 1500: 19 Jeep Gladiator: 21 Mercedes-Benz GLE: 23 Jeep Wrangler: 24 Consumer Reports noted that sedans are the most reliable vehicle category and found that trucks are far lower on the list. That said, the survey showed that trucks from American brands tended to have better reliability scores, so it’s surprising to see GMÂ’s big two and the Ford F-150 on the list. Part of their problematic ownership experience could be due to the fact that all three trucks have received recent updates, and the Ford was completely redesigned for 2022. New tech, fresh drivetrain components, and other improvements can upset the balance of reliability and make newer models look less dependable than their older counterparts. Related video: Green Chevrolet Ford GMC Hyundai Jeep Lincoln Mercedes-Benz Nissan Car Buying Truck Crossover Hatchback SUV Electric Hybrid Sedan Consumer Reports reliability

Ford patents a multi-touch version of its classic keypad

Fri, Sep 9 2016

For decades, Ford has offered a keypad on the doors of their cars that would allow owners access with the right code. Amazingly, the keypad has survived almost unchanged except for a recent touch button version. A new patent from the Blue Oval shows the keypad may get a big upgrade soon. The first big change is that it looks like the keypad may move to the key fob. Although it might be possible to have it on the car itself as well, the patent only seems to focus on the key fob. In addition, the fob will now be a multi-touch pad similar to that of modern smartphones. This will allow for more diverse code entries, according to the patent's description. Instead of just a simple number code, owners could enter a code that involves swipes and keystrokes, and even simultaneous keystrokes. For instance, you could enter a code that requires swiping from 1 to 3, followed by holding 2 and 4 to unlock the car. The patent also seems to indicate that this keypad would then display unlock functions and other functions on the fob after the correct code is entered, thus making it more than just a way to unlock the car. As for the practical implications of this keypad system update, it could provide an added layer of security. If someone steals your keys, they would have to also know your access code to get into the car. Whether this would also help make the key and car harder to hack would remain to be seen, though. Another possible benefit could be the prevention of accidental lock and alarm button presses, although that likely isn't a common issue. There could be potential downsides as well. If used as an extra layer of security, the legitimate owner would have to punch in their code on the fob to get in, which would render proximity key benefits relatively useless. Moving the keypad to the fob would also mean owners couldn't get into their cars without having the key with them. We don't have any clues as to when this could become a feature, but it doesn't seem like it would be difficult to implement, so it could show up in the next few years. Related Video: News Source: United States Patent and Trademark OfficeImage Credit: Ford, United States Patent and Trademark Office / Ford Auto News Ford Lincoln Technology keyless entry

VW going turbo-only in 3 to 4 years

Wed, 18 Sep 2013

This really was a matter of when, rather than if. Volkswagen will apparently be the first manufacturer to phase out naturally aspirated engines in favor of turbocharging its full slate. VW is kind of responsible for ushering in this push towards small-displacement, turbocharged engines that's taken the industry by storm. When it dropped its direct-injection, 2.0-liter turbo in the 2005 GTI it demonstrated that strapping an iron long to an engine can enhance the powertrain as a whole. VW made fuel economy gains, while also giving a linear, non-laggy turbo experience that it has replicated, model-after-model, to this day.
Speaking with The Detroit News, Volkswagen's executive Vice President of Group Quality, Marc Trahan, told the paper that, "We only have one normally aspirated gas engine, and when we go to the next generation vehicle that it's in, it will be replaced. So three, four years maximum."
Really, it's hard to get teary-eyed about either of these engines going away. VW has access to smaller powerplants that could easily match the performance of the 2.5 five-cylinder and the 3.6 V6, while gobbling up less fuel and providing a better driving experience. What we are sad about is that a similar statement about the extinction of NA engines came from the Vice President of Powertrain Engineering at Ford, Joe Bakaj. We'd certainly get teary-eyed over a world without Ford's excellent 5.0-liter V8.