Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Ford F-100 Pickup Lowered New Interior Pantina Faux Finish V8 on 2040-cars

Year:1964 Mileage:999999 Color: RUSTY /
 Red
Location:

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

Used

Year
: 1964
Interior Color: Red
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: F-100
Trim: RED INTERIOR
Drive Type: 2WD
Mileage: 999,999
Sub Model: PICKUP
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Exterior Color: RUSTY

THIS TRUCK STARTED AS A RUST FREE ARIZONA TRUCK....THE FAUX PATINA PAINT FINISH GIVES THE TRUCK THAT "PATINA" LOOK BUT ITS A SOLID RUSTY FREE TRUCK. ...(EXCEPT FOR ONE SMALL THREE INCH SPOT IN BED)

THE TRUCK HAS BEEN LOWERED USING A DROP FRONT AXLE AND "C" NOTCH IN THE REAR TO ACHIVE THE PERFECT STANCE. IT ALSO HAS NEW DUAL EXHAUST TO THE REAR WITH FLOW MASTERS...IT SOUNDS GREAT!

THE INTERIOR HAS ALL NEW SEAT ....CARPET... HEADLINER....STEERING WHEEL AND SHIFTER HEAD....

THE TRUCK RUNS AND DRIVES EXCELLENT!! ....WITH A FORD V8 AND 4-SPEED TRANNY IT SOUNDS GREAT AND IS A BLAST TO DRIVE!.....

ASK ALL QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU BID...NOT AFTER...CALL ME DIRECT AT 216-299-0702  MAKE SURE THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT BEFORE IT ENDS NOT AFTER....BECAUSE OF ITS AGE I WILL SELL THE TRUCK AS TRUE MILES UNKNOWN...ARIZONA RESIDENTS WILL PAY SALES TAX.

PLEASE ONLY SERIOUS BIDDERS ONLY...PLEASE TREAT MY SALE WITH THE SAME RESPECT THAT YOU WANT TO BE TREATED AS A BUYER. SO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE ALL FUNDS TO WIRE WHEN SALE ENDS OR CASH ON PICK UP. ALL CERTFIED BANK CHECKS MUST CLEAR BEFORE TITLE OR CAR WILL BE RELEASED SO PLAN AHEAD. CAR IS SOLD AS-IS NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. AUCTION CAN BE ENDED WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL BUY IT NOW OFFERS WILL BE REVIEWED. CALL WITH ANY QUESTIONS...GOOD LUCK!!!

Auto Services in Arizona

Valleywide TV Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Satellite & Cable TV Equipment & Systems Repair & Service, Television & Radio-Service & Repair
Address: 5930 W Greenway Rd Ste #10, Peoria
Phone: (602) 354-5557

Ultimate Imports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1900 N McClintock Dr Suite 15, Scottsdale
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tucson Auto Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2510 W Wetmore Rd, Marana
Phone: (520) 292-1330

ToyoMotors Service and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2818 E Bell Rd, Sun-City
Phone: (602) 971-8137

The Auto Shop Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Alternators & Generators
Address: 901 N Central Ave, Peoria
Phone: (602) 256-6164

Tech 1 Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 8736 West Thunderbird Road #3, Surprise
Phone: (623) 486-4824

Auto blog

Who would win in a race if the Super Bowl teams were cars?

Sat, Feb 6 2016

Until the last down is played this Sunday, we will have the annoyance pleasure of listening to analysts bicker between who will win the Super Bowl, not unlike automotive analysts who do the same thing with cars. If I had a dollar for every conversation about what car would win against another on a specific track, I wouldn't be buying the raw avocados this year for my guacamole. Instead I would be purchasing organic avocados and have the guacamole served in a Ferrari-themed bowl. Yes, those exist. Even so, we still watch year after year knowing full well that the pre-game analysis typically adds up to less than what is left over in the chip bowl after the last guest leaves. Let's take a different approach to analysis this year, let's compare these teams to their vehicle equivalent to decide who would win in a fair race. How do you determine a fair race? When I think of a fair race I think of the Nurburgring. A track that is 12.9 miles, has 1,000 feet of elevation change, and is famously nicknamed The Green Hell by famed driver Jackie Stewart. Although your Supra may beat The Flash himself in a straight line, chances are once you push it to the limits on a 12.9-mile track your brakes will smell like a bonfire and your suspension will have gone into cardiac arrest twice. So if we're racing The 'Ring, what are we driving? To best answer that question we must determine what characteristics define these teams. Not being someone who knows more about my fantasy league than my significant other, I can only go off what I have heard from "experts." The Panthers are honestly known for Cam Newton. Cam is a versatile, fast, brash, and fairly young quarterback. He apologizes for nothing and has Ali-like confidence that shows in his choice of Liberace-type attire. Although he looks to be the favorite, he hasn't yet won a Super Bowl and the team's second-half performances are less than climatic. In racing terms, he has won a lot but no one has seen him race in the dark at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. The Panthers have a ton of acceleration, a brand new chassis, and a driver who is hungry for that first big win. On the other side of the track are the Broncos. It seems as though the Broncos are known for two things, a nostalgic quarterback and a defense that could strike fear into a Honey Badger. If the Broncos were just one component of a vehicle they would be the brakes, and these brakes are outfitted for a locomotive.

Detroit Three's lucrative pickup war intensifies as Ram makes big gains

Thu, Jan 3 2019

DETROIT — The battle for profits from sales of large pickup trucks is intensifying among the Detroit Three automakers as sales of small cars in the United States shrivel. For decades Ford has had the single best-selling truck brand in its F-Series trucks. General Motors' Chevrolet brand was a solid No. 2, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' Ram was a distant third. Now, that hierarchy may be in flux. Sales figures for December and the fourth quarter released on Thursday show Ram tied with GM's Chevy for the No. 2 spot, as sales of the redesigned Ram pickup surged, fueled in part by demand for an optional 12-inch (30.48 cm) dashboard screen. Chevy not long ago held second place to Ford by a wide margin. GM executives said on Thursday they are bullish on their new GMC and Chevy trucks for 2019.Related: How the Detroit Three's pickups compare on paper 2019 Ram 1500 Laramie review 2019 Chevy Silverado 2.7L four-cylinder review 2019 Ford F-150 2.7L EcoBoost review "There's no doubt this segment (pickup trucks) is one of the epicenters of the auto wars," said Sandor Piszar, director of marketing for Chevrolet at GM. "It's been that way forever, and we wouldn't have it any other way." On Wall Street, investors give electric car leader Tesla a higher valuation than any of the Detroit automakers. But in the nation's heartland, big pickups remain far more popular and profitable than any electric car — and most other consumer vehicles of any kind. Large pickups generate at least $17,000 a vehicle in pretax profit for GM, the company has indicated in disclosures to investors. By contrast, many Detroit Three sedans are so unprofitable, their manufacturers have decided not to build them anymore. 'Hotly contested' Sustaining sales and pricing in the large-pickup segment will be critical in a year when most forecasters expect overall U.S. car and light truck sales to fall. Ford's U.S. sales chief, Mark LaNeve, on Thursday called the F Series "the backbone of our franchise" during a conference call, and added the "segment will continue to be strong, but hotly contested" in 2019. Automakers are banking on pickup truck sales to stay strong even if U.S. interest rates continue to rise. Rising interest rates translate into higher monthly car payments and are expected to deter some buyers in 2019. GM has said 27 percent of Chevrolet and GMC trucks — which can haul trailers by day and substitute for a luxury sedan by night — sell for more than $55,000.

2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise

Mon, Jan 2 2017

About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.