Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1989 Ford Bronco **excellent Condition** With Soft And Hard Convertible Top on 2040-cars

US $14,900.00
Year:1989 Mileage:64000 Color: Black /
 Red
Location:

Smyrna, Tennessee, United States

Smyrna, Tennessee, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
Engine:5.0L 302Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FMEU15N8KLA18781 Year: 1989
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco
Trim: XLT Sport Utility 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4WD
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Convertible
Mileage: 64,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Red
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"The Bronco is in excellent condition, especially for 1989. The interior is original and looks great."

1989 Ford Bronco with removable hardtop AND convertible soft-top. Brand new hot rod matte black paint, Interior is original and in remarkable condition, 5 Brand new American Racing wheels in black teflon with 5 brand new BF Goodrich All Terrain tires, New front and rear bumpers from Bronco Graveyard with Smittybilt XRD8 winch. Incredible stereo system. This is a very rare, clean and low miles Bronco. 64,000 original miles. Everything has been gone through. It is reliable and would make a great restoration vehicle (It's almost there now!). Might trade for equal value vehicle..?? I can also help with financing. Thanks and call or email with questions 615-707-9130.

Auto Services in Tennessee

Tri County Tires ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 909 E Tri County Blvd, Oak-Ridge
Phone: (865) 435-7259

Travis Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4603 Sulphur Springs Rd, Smyrna
Phone: (615) 410-7168

Tindell G T Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 2902 Andersonville Hwy, Andersonville
Phone: (865) 494-0361

Taylor`s Paint & Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 176 Park St, College-Dale
Phone: (706) 858-0907

Stanley`s ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2610 N Roan St, Mountain-Home
Phone: (423) 282-6711

Sport 4 Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 120 Honey Bear Campground Rd, Trade
Phone: (828) 963-9507

Auto blog

Ford won't be releasing GT500 lap times for the 'Ring, or any other car

Wed, 27 Nov 2013

Trucks have towing capacity, EVs have driving range and performance cars have Nürburgring lap times. What do all three have in common? They should all be taken with a grain of salt. Currently, there is no sanctioned way to record lap times or verify production-spec cars - a lesson we recently learned with the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo - and until there is a way to do so (and there probably never will be), we'll never officially know the actual time it took for Ford to lap the 'Ring with its ultra-powerful Shelby GT500.
After posting a Ford-made video of a 2013 GT500 running around the 'Ring, the guys over at SVTPerformance.com (an enthusiasts forum not affiliated with Ford or SVT) wanted more answers. They got in touch with Ford's Global Performance Vehicle Chief Engineer Jamal Hameedi, who said until there is a way to verify the times and inspect the cars, Ford will not get involved with lap-time wars. In the email, Hameedi pointed out that the 'Ring is a useful tool in that it allows a wide spectrum of track conditions, but until there is a governed way to record times, there is no way to accurately compare cars head-to-head.
And as much as some may not like it, Hameedi speaks the truth. It really isn't possible to compare times from one car to another, unless those cars were lapping the same track at the same time with the same driver. Not that any of this means there won't be continuous wars by fans and manufacturers alike... in other words, feel free to voice your opinions in the Comments below.

Ford, Ram in heavy-duty towing spat

Mon, 28 Jul 2014

Every pickup truck commercial has the brand trying to convince us that its model is the biggest, brawniest vehicle on the block. But Ford and Ram appear ready to really throw down the gauntlet and scrap over the towing figures for their heavy-duty models, and it could potentially end up in court.
The issue revolves around what it means to be best in class. Ford claims that its 2015 F-450 (pictured above) has a max tow rating of 31,200 pounds, compared to 30,000 pounds for the Ram 3500 (right). However, both companies market these heavy haulers as having the top towing in their class. According to Automotive News, Ford is threatening legal action if Ram doesn't back down.
The situation isn't as simple as just comparing the numbers, though. First, the two companies calculate their towing capacities differently. Ram adheres to the SAE J2807 rating, while Ford uses its own internal system. Although, as the company introduces new models, they are certified using the SAE standard. "When an all-new F-Series Super Duty is introduced, it also will use SAE J2807," said Ford to Autoblog in an emailed statement.

American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings

Fri, 10 May 2013

Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.