Extra Clean, Only 35,167 Miles! Epa 25 Mpg Hwy/22 Mpg City! Frozen White on 2040-cars
Mission, Kansas, United States
Engine:2.0L 121Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Make: Ford
Model: Transit Connect
Options: Compact Disc
Trim: XLT Mini Passenger Van 4-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 35,167
Doors: 4
Sub Model: 4dr Wgn XLT
Engine Description: 2.0L I4 FI DOHC 16V
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 4
Ford Transit Connect for Sale
2010 ford transit connnect xlt 2.0l front disc/rear drum brakes a/c bckup cam(US $16,977.00)
2010 ford transit connect xlt park assist only 52k mi! texas direct auto(US $17,980.00)
2010 ford transit connect xl mini cargo van 4-door 2.0l-one owner(US $9,500.00)
2012 ford transit connect wagon 4dr wgn xlt premium
2011 ford transit connect xl cargo van 36,366 miles 1-owner(US $19,900.00)
Handicap wheelchair van
Auto Services in Kansas
Ward`s Mobile Mechanics ★★★★★
V Werks ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Sales & Salvage ★★★★★
Sutton-Kauffman Transmission ★★★★★
Showroom Automotive ★★★★★
Riley`s Rescue ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chevy Silverado frame twist test a marketing victory versus Ford
Thu, 16 Oct 2014The pickup market is so competitive that all three major American makers are constantly trying to find a way to prove their product is the best. The new 2015 Ford F-150 is grabbing headlines at the moment by winning awards and posting segment best numbers. But in a new video, Chevrolet is taking aim squarely at the 2015 F-250 Super Duty in a battle of heavy-duty truck supremacy against the 2015 Chevy Silverado 2500HD... well, in a single metric anyway.
The big numbers from pickups often come down to payload, towing rating and fuel economy, but for this test, Chevy and Howie Long are challenging the torsional rigidity of the trucks' frames, specifically which one flexes less. Long plays the everyman here having the Chevy engineer explain what's going on in the tests. Unsurprisingly for a video on Chevy's official YouTube page, the 2500HD wins out by a good margin. The company also reports that similar results as shown here have been certified in third-party testing.
Check out the video to see the full test. While this might seem like a marketing win for Chevy, Ford isn't immune to it, either. In 2009, the Blue Oval uploaded a similar video comparing the flex under 225 pounds of weight from the bare frames of the F-150, Chevy Silverado, Dodge Ram (as it was still called at the time) and the Toyota Tundra. The results fell in the Blue Oval's favor, as you can see here.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #329 LIVE!
Mon, 15 Apr 2013We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #329 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #329
Subcompact sales slump, yet again
The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different
Fri, May 8 2020The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.
