Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Ford Flex Limited 4wd 62k Miles Navigation Back-up Camera Best Deal! on 2040-cars

US $18,975.00
Year:2010 Mileage:62472 Color: Gray /
 Medium Light Stone
Location:

Farmingdale, New Jersey, United States

Farmingdale, New Jersey, United States
Advertising:
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:3.5L 3496CC 213Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sport Utility
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 2FMHK6DC4ABA90317 Year: 2010
Make: Ford
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Model: Flex
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Trim: Limited Sport Utility 4-Door
Doors: 4
Drive Type: AWD
Engine Description: 3.5L V6 FI DOHC 24V
Mileage: 62,472
Drivetrain: 4-Wheel Drive
Sub Model: Limited
Number of Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Medium Light Stone
Number of Cylinders: 6
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Ford Flex for Sale

Auto Services in New Jersey

Vitos Auto Electric ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 1374 Stuyvesant Ave, Elizabeth
Phone: (908) 688-3818

Town Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 107 Grove St, Essex-Fells
Phone: (973) 744-0808

Tony`s Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 711 W Oregon Ave, Audubon
Phone: (215) 389-6129

Stan`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 714 Old Shore Rd, Barnegat-Lgt
Phone: (609) 242-7826

Sam`s Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Automobile Detailing
Address: 132 E Route 59, Pompton-Lakes
Phone: (845) 623-3800

Rdn Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 344 S Main St, Long-Beach-Township
Phone: (609) 698-2100

Auto blog

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.

These cars are headed to the Great Crusher In The Sky

Fri, 24 Aug 2012

It happens every year. We bid adieu to some cars and trucks that will be missed, and say good riddance to others wondering how they stayed around so long. Whether they're being killed off for slow sales or due to a new product coming along to replace them, the list of vehicles being discontinued after 2012 is surprisingly long and diverse.
CNN Money has compiled a list of departing vehicles, to which we've added a few more of our own. In the slow sales column, cars like the Lexus HS 250h, Mercedes-Benz R-Class and the full Maybach lineup appear, while the Ford Escape Hybrid, Mazda CX-7 and Hyundai Veracruz are all having their gaps filled with more modern and more fuel-efficient alternatives. Obvious exceptions to the rule include models that still sell in decent numbers like the Jeep Liberty and the Chrysler Town & Country (which will eventually be replaced by a crossover-like vehicle).
Check out our gallery of discontinued cars above, then scroll down for more information.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.