Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Ford F-250 F250 Xl Crew Cab 7.3 Diesel 7.3l 4x4 Long Bed Only 94k!! L@@k!!! on 2040-cars

US $10,995.00
Year:2002 Mileage:94746
Location:

Sacramento, California, United States

Sacramento, California, United States
Advertising:

2002 FORD F250
7.3 DIESEL CREW CAB
4X4 / LONG BED
VERY LOW 94, 746 ORIGINAL MILES!!!
1 OWNER
CLEAN HISTORY REPORT


The indestructible 7.3 diesel is getting harder and harder to find with low miles. This is a great example of a VERY low mileage 7.3 you can get for a STEAL of a price! This truck is a work truck, indicated it has no options. It does have the 7.3 motor, is 4X4, and is very well maintained. The truck however does have dents, dings, and scratches throughout. It was never in any form of wreck, but it has been used to work! It has been fleet maintained and mechanically runs and drives great. This is a perfect work or farm truck, but not the greatest truck to take your date on. This truck is equipped with nice snow tires.  Don't let this highly desirable crew cab 7.3 4x4 with low miles pass you up! 

IF YOU'LL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS,
  PLEASE CALL OR TEXT VICK AT 609-774-0606
 photo DSC01320.jpg  photo DSC01321.jpg  photo DSC01322.jpg  photo DSC01323.jpg  photo DSC01324.jpg  photo DSC01325.jpg  photo DSC01326.jpg  photo DSC01327.jpg  photo DSC01328.jpg  photo DSC01329.jpg  photo DSC01330.jpg  photo DSC01331.jpg  photo DSC01332.jpg  photo DSC01333.jpg  photo DSC01334.jpg  photo DSC01335.jpg  photo DSC01336.jpg  photo DSC01337.jpg  photo DSC01338.jpg  photo DSC01339.jpg  photo DSC01340.jpg  photo DSC01341.jpg  photo DSC01342.jpg  photo DSC01343.jpg  photo DSC01344.jpg  photo DSC01345.jpg  photo DSC01346.jpg  photo DSC01347.jpg  photo DSC01348.jpg  photo DSC01349.jpg  photo DSC01350.jpg  photo DSC01351.jpg  photo DSC01352.jpg  photo DSC01353.jpg  photo DSC01354.jpg  photo DSC01355.jpg  photo DSC01356.jpg  photo DSC01358.jpg  photo DSC01359.jpg   photo DSC01362.jpg  photo DSC01363.jpg  photo DSC01364.jpg  photo DSC01365.jpg  photo DSC01366.jpg  photo DSC01367.jpg  photo DSC01368.jpg  photo DSC01369.jpg  photo DSC01370.jpg  photo DSC01371.jpg  photo DSC01372.jpg  photo DSC01373.jpg  photo DSC01374.jpg  photo DSC01375.jpg  photo DSC01376.jpg  photo DSC01377.jpg  photo DSC01378.jpg

Auto Services in California

Woody`s Auto Body and Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 9020 Gardendale St, Santa-Fe-Springs
Phone: (562) 633-3813

Westside Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Brake Repair
Address: 115 McPherson St, Davenport
Phone: (831) 600-7074

West Coast Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 15144 Valley Blvd, Cerritos
Phone: (626) 961-2779

Webb`s Auto & Truck ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2146 S Atlantic Blvd, Bell-Gardens
Phone: (323) 268-1266

VRC Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2409 Main St, Moreno-Valley
Phone: (951) 276-3280

Visions Automotive Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Glass-Automobile, Plate, Window, Etc-Manufacturers
Address: 8698 Elk Grove Blvd #1-238, Walnut-Grove
Phone: (877) 312-0678

Auto blog

2020 Ford Explorer safer than old model; crash test ratings short of Top Safety Pick

Mon, Dec 16 2019

The 2020 Ford Explorer three-row crossover has improved on the outgoing model in many ways. According to the IIHS, it has also improved in a number of safety categories, but not enough to earn a Top Safety Pick award. The culprit is not the headlight performance for once. The Explorer's headlights were given an "Acceptable" rating, which would be sufficient for Top Safety Pick, if not Top Safety Pick +. Where the Ford falls short is in the front small overlap driver-side crash test, in which it got the second highest "Acceptable" rating. The IIHS requires a "Good" rating in this category, whereas an "Acceptable" rating on the passenger side would be, well, acceptable for Top Safety Pick. According to IIHS, Ford will be reviewing the results to figure out what the issue is, and it will likely make revisions to future Explorers to improve the result. Other than the one test, the Explorer performed admirably. It received a "Good" rating in all other crash categories except the passenger-side small overlap that was not tested. Both its standard and optional forward collision prevention systems had the highest "Superior" ratings, with the standard one preventing a collision with a car at speeds of up to 25 mph, and the optional one avoiding a collision at 12 mph, and "nearly" preventing one at 25 mph. Headlights are rated as "Acceptable" and so is access to child seat LATCH anchors. Also worth noting is that the Explorer's crash test ratings apply to its luxurious twin the 2020 Lincoln Aviator, meaning it also doesn't get a Top Safety Pick rating. The forward collision system performed the same as in the Ford, and the only difference between the two was in headlight performance. The Lincoln's standard headlights, included on the base, Reserve and Grand Touring trims, have the second-lowest "Marginal" rating, but the optional headlights for those trims, and the standard ones on the Black Label trim, received the "Good" rating. Among three-row Explorer competitors, the Honda Pilot, Hyundai Santa Fe XL, Kia Telluride, Nissan Pathfinder and Toyota Highlander all have a Top Safety Pick. The Hyundai Palisade, Mazda CX-9, Subaru Ascent, and the slightly smaller Kia Sorento and Volkswagen Tiguan all have a Top Safety Pick +. As for Lincoln Aviator competitors, the Cadillac XT6, Infiniti QX60, Lexus RX and Volvo XC90 get a Top Safety Pick. The Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class and two-row-only BMW X5 get the Top Safety Pick + rating. Related Video:      

Ward's Automotive Ten Best Engines of 2014 dominated by diesels, turbos

Thu, 12 Dec 2013

With the Car and Driver Ten Best decided, the North American Car and Truck of the Year finalists announced and Cadillac, Ram and Subaru chalking up wins with Motor Trend, it's fair to say that the automotive awards season is in full swing. The next set of trophies to be handed out will be from Ward's Automotive, which has announced the winners of its 2014 10 Best Engines.
The latest contest was marked by the widespread emergence of diesel power and the continued success of turbocharged engines. There was even an electric motor on this year's list. In fact, only three of the ten winners were naturally aspirated and only two winners returned from last year.
"We weren't looking to throw the bums out, as they might say about an election. We were just really impressed with the flood of new powertrains," said Ward's Automotive Editor-in-Chief Drew Winter. Those new powertrains include the 83-kilowatt electric motor from the Fiat 500e, the 1.0-liter, EcoBoost three-cylinder from the Ford Fiesta and the 2.0-liter turbodiesel from the Chevrolet Cruze.

2014 Ford F-150 gets CNG option

Wed, 31 Jul 2013

Ford is toiling away, installing heavy-duty engine components into select 3.7-liter V6s to allow them to run on compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquid petroleum gas (LPG) in addition to gasoline. That's nothing new, but now, Ford has announced that it will offer the 2014 F-150 with this engine configuration, bringing the Blue Oval's total number of CNG/LPG-friendly vehicles up to eight. The F-150 will be the only half-ton pickup on the market that can run on these gases.
Ford will charge $315 per vehicle to equip the optional engine, but the trucks won't be ready to run on the alternative fuels straight from the factory and must be upfitted with additional equipment. A Ford Qualified Vehicle Modifier will install a separate fuel system for the compressed gases at a cost of $7,500 to $9,500, depending on fuel tank size. With the right-size tank, the F-150 equipped with the CNG/LPG-prepped engine can go 750 miles on one tank of gas, according to Ford, averaging 23 miles per gallon.
The practice of offering flex-fuel vehicles is gaining momentum as businesses take advantage of cheap gas. CNG can be bought for $2.11/gallon on average (per gasoline equivalent), and sometimes for as little as $1.00 in some parts of the US, Ford states. "With the money saved using CNG, customers could start to see payback on their investment in as little as 24 to 36 months," says Jon Coleman, Ford's fleet sustainability and technology manager. The automaker expects to sell a total of 15,000 CNG/LPG-prepped vehicles in the 2014 model year.