Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F150 Xlt on 2040-cars

US $35,986.00
Year:2014 Mileage:0 Color: Sunset Metallic /
 Gray
Location:

14897 MO-38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States

14897 MO-38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.5L V6 24V GDI DOHC Twin Turbo
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTFW1ET4EKE38713
Stock Num: 22615
Make: Ford
Model: F150 XLT
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Sunset Metallic
Interior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 36.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 60 cu.ft.
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.3"
  • Rear Hip Room: 64.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 43.5"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.5"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Auto Services in Missouri

West County Auto Body Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1650 N Lindbergh Blvd, Breckenridge-Hills
Phone: (314) 993-4466

Tower Motors ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3729 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Cottleville
Phone: (636) 757-7300

Tiny`s Repair Service & Fab ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1805 S Main St, Salem
Phone: (573) 729-3880

Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Transmissions-Other
Address: 1548 N Glenstone Ave, Morrisville
Phone: (417) 581-2886

Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 1306 S Commercial St, Greenwood
Phone: (866) 449-9818

Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 1306 S Commercial St, Garden-City
Phone: (866) 449-9818

Auto blog

Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems

Fri, 29 Mar 2013

A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.

Ford CEO Mark Fields takes home $18.6 million

Fri, Mar 27 2015

Sitting atop the throne at Ford Motor Company is, as it turns out, a fairly lucrative gig. We make that statement after learning, through SEC filings, that FoMoCo's Mark Fields raked in $18.6 million in compensation during his first year as CEO. Now, as is so often the case, Fields' earnings weren't just straight salary. Only $1.7 million of that sum was from his salary, while another $3.2 million came from cash bonuses. The remaining $13.7 million, though, came from what The Detroit Free Press called "long-term stock options, performance equity awards and compensation for items such as security and travel," according to the SEC filing. That makes for a significant raise for Fields, who made $10.1 million in 2013, but it still doesn't match his predecessor, former CEO Alan Mulally. The 69-year-old Mulally earned $23.2 million in his final year as CEO, while bringing in $1 million last year as part of a $22 million compensation package. Fields' earnings may ruffle some features for a few reasons. First, while the Freep reports that Ford hit 91 percent of its performance goals, 2014's earnings were down $4 billion, to $3.2 billion, compared to the $7.2 billion the company made in 2013. On top of that, the CEO's take-home might be sour grapes for hourly employees, who were only treated to checks worth $6,900, as part of a profit-sharing plan. To that, Ford said in a statement that, "We remain absolutely committed to aligning executive compensation with the company's business performance and to tying a significant portion of executive compensation to long-term shareholder value." News Source: The Detroit Free PressImage Credit: Paul Sancya / AP Earnings/Financials Ford alan mulally Mark Fields

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.