1985 Four Wheel Drive 4x4 Chevy Sportvan By Lrp Like Quigley Off Road 5.7 V8 on 2040-cars
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
You are bidding on my 1985 Chevrolet Sportsvan 4x4 conversion by LRP customs in Elkhorn WI. It has heavy duty 8 lug 3/4 ton axles,locking hubs up front 373 posi out back, 5.7 TP V8 with a Th400 automatic transmissions , np209 transfer case selects the 2 and 4 wheel drive modes.Hard to find HD 4x4 van , not a backyard hack job.a good solid heavy duty van.I used it to haul my quad in and camp out of .its fun to drive, has lots of power and sounds great
Bad: Rust thru on sliding door (common spot due to leakey window seal window seals are in poor shape random volt dash warning light (can't track it down, alternator tested good, battery is good and holds charge) could use front springs resprung or replaced will eventually need front shaft ujoints $29.00 each(clunk in reverse) various dents and dings and general lack of paint loose drivers mirror new seat covers are covering factory seats in poor condition no stereo radio roof has light surface rust more like dust, no structure prob no holes or cuts either great fresh oil change transmission flush/fluid belts shocks tires gas&radiator cap 16" american racing rims runs drives shifts and stops great true dual exhaust solid rust free Heavy Duty 4x4 Chevrolet Van doesn't drip anything on the driveway working rear heater can provide video of it running driving starting ext this is a good core for someone wanting a one of a kind American custom or a good base for someone that needs a hunting camping machine that has a good 4x4 setup that won't cost an arm and a leg. this van always starts right up and never hesitates falls overheats,misses shift nothing, it big and bad. I wish I could keep it but I need to thin the herd out a little more........Its America after all Only bid if you got the dough, no new users, must have feedback and at least 6 months history, bid with confidence , All my buyers are always satisfied . Also I am not responsible for shipping arrangements , buyer must work out pickup details . I can safely store vehicle for 30 days at no cost . if you choose to fly in and drive the van home that your decision and responsibility. Thanks for bidding |
Chevrolet G20 Van for Sale
Rare 4x4 chevy van california truck 327 v8
1994 chevy g20 van mark iii and hoveround
1994 franklin coach coversion g20 van(US $4,900.00)
1979 chevy van (g10)
1987 chevrolet (gmc) rally wagon short wheel base van project. non running
1966 chevy g10 window sport van hot rod gasser rat rod street rod low rider
Auto Services in New Mexico
Sure Shot Customs ★★★★★
Quic Transmissions & Auto Services Inc ★★★★★
Mike`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Marez Automotive & Welding Service ★★★★★
M & T Glass Co ★★★★★
Jack Key Motor Co ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 Chevy Volt ads strike frustrating, yet familiar, chord
Fri, Oct 2 2015Sometimes, it's hard to let go. In the six years that GM has been advertising and selling the Chevy Volt, one dominant message is that the car is an EV without any range anxiety. On the one hand, this is a positive thing: our car does something that other electric vehicles don't. Of course, there's another, more reasonable take on the message that EVs only equal limited range: don't promote this viewpoint if you ever plan on selling a pure EV. But, of course, this is exactly what GM is doing with a new ad for the 2016 Chevy Volt. Called Elevator, the spot (watch it above) compares driving an all-electric car with riding in an elevator getting stuck. Your Nissan Leaf might run out of electricity, the ad says, and that would be as uncomfortable as being trapped between floors. The main problem, of course, is that Chevy also offers the Spark EV and is getting ready to sell the Bolt EV. Does the company think that everyone will forget these anti-EV commercials when it come time to shop for a Bolt? Even worse, does GM think we've forgotten the Anthem ad for the Volt back in 2010? Apparently, so. Elevator isn't the only ad for the 2016 Volt that GM debuted today. The other, called Time Capsule (below), takes a swipe at the Toyota Prius. Trouble is, there are two easy ways to dismiss this ad as well. First, and most obviously, if GM is against using old technology, then why does it continue to shove a 100-year-old fossil fuel engine into almost every car it builds? Second, attacking the Prius for using 15-year-old tech – when said tech is still able to mop the floor with any hybrid from GM in the fuel economy race - is more like an admission of defeat than anything to be proud of. "Hey look, the Prius uses technology from the '90s," GM says. To which the observant viewer will ask, "Well, then why can't you build a 50-mile-per-gallon hybrid, GM?" It's also worth noting that Chevy has been on a misguided advertising streak as of late. We bashed their ads that suggested its Silverado is better than the F-150 because it uses steel instead of aluminum, too, especially since those commercials used shark cages and stupid superhero costumes in an attempt to make a point. Chevy, stop assuming we're all idiots. Please. Now, the 2016 Volt is a great car and I know that GM can make a darn good Volt ad (like this one), so seeing the company shoot solid fuel-efficient technologies in the back (again and again) is just frustrating.
NHTSA could add 1M cars to GM recall
Wed, 13 Mar 2013
The Detroit Free Press is reporting that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration may expand a recall campaign for faulty brake lamps. The agency is currently looking into complaints that certain 2004-2011 Chevrolet Malibu models as well as some 2007-2009 Saturn Aura sedans may have brake lights that do not illuminate when the driver presses the pedal. Alternatively, the lamps may also illuminate without input from the driver. General Motors recalled 8,000 Pontiac G6 models from the 2005 model year for the same problem, and NHTSA is currently investigating whether to add 550,000 more G6 models built between 2005 and 2009 to the list for the same issue.
In addition, investigators are currently examining 97 complaints from Malibu and Aura owners with the same trouble. If NHTSA adds those models to the recall campaign, more than one million units could be covered. GM, meanwhile, says there have been no accidents or injuries as a result of the problem.
A car writer's year in new vehicles [w/video]
Thu, Dec 18 2014Christmas is only a week away. The New Year is just around the corner. As 2014 draws to a close, I'm not the only one taking stock of the year that's we're almost shut of. Depending on who you are or what you do, the end of the year can bring to mind tax bills, school semesters or scheduling dental appointments. For me, for the last eight or nine years, at least a small part of this transitory time is occupied with recalling the cars I've driven over the preceding 12 months. Since I started writing about and reviewing cars in 2006, I've done an uneven job of tracking every vehicle I've been in, each year. Last year I made a resolution to be better about it, and the result is a spreadsheet with model names, dates, notes and some basic facts and figures. Armed with this basic data and a yen for year-end stories, I figured it would be interesting to parse the figures and quantify my year in cars in a way I'd never done before. The results are, well, they're a little bizarre, honestly. And I think they'll affect how I approach this gig in 2015. {C} My tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015 it'll be as high as 73. Let me give you a tiny bit of background about how automotive journalists typically get cars to test. There are basically two pools of vehicles I drive on a regular basis: media fleet vehicles and those available on "first drive" programs. The latter group is pretty self-explanatory. Journalists are gathered in one location (sometimes local, sometimes far-flung) with a new model(s), there's usually a day of driving, then we report back to you with our impressions. Media fleet vehicles are different. These are distributed to publications and individual journalists far and wide, and the test period goes from a few days to a week or more. Whereas first drives almost always result in a piece of review content, fleet loans only sometimes do. Other times they serve to give context about brands, segments, technology and the like, to editors and writers. So, adding up the loans I've had out of the press fleet and things I've driven at events, my tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015, it'll be as high as 73. At one of the buff books like Car and Driver or Motor Trend, reviewers might rotate through five cars a week, or more. I know that number sounds high, but as best I can tell, it's pretty average for the full-time professionals in this business.