1999 Chevy S-10 Work Truck 73,558 Original Miles. One Owner Truck. 2.2l on 2040-cars
Ford City, Pennsylvania, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.2L
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Manual
Make: Chevrolet
Model: S-10
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: 2WD
Mileage: 73,558
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: White
Number of Doors: 2
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 4
Trim: work truck
Sub Model: short bed
This truck was used as a commuter/light load delivery truck. It was driven primarily by young careless employees that smoked. They generally did not take good care of it and managed to somehow even kick the bottom of the driver's door numerous times. The good news is that is about the worst of it. It does have surface rust, small dents and dings as shown, and is generally dirty. It has sat for the past four years so it has considerable scaley rust on the frame, etc. We replaced most of the brake lines recently due to excessive rust, but apparently did not get all of the air out of the lines because the pedal is low. The engine runs well and seems to have lots of clutch left. The interior surprisingly is in pretty good shape. No noticable tears in the seat, dash in good shape, etc. The radio and blower/heat work fine. The tires have good tread but do have some dry rot cracks. They appear to be superficial, but a fussy PA state inspector may flag them. There are no trim rings on the rims, which have some rust. There are center hubs, but they are not installed. The ladder rack is rusty and has a hole in one spot as shown in a photo. The tool boxes are generally ok, but there is one hole as shown. The ladder rack has caused some damage to the tops of the side rails where mounted, but this is pretty typical. There is a bedliner that is dirty but sound. The tailgate was apparently painted using a spray can at some point. I have no idea why, but it is peeling a little pretty much all over. The bumpers are both rusty, but no major dents. Apparently they lost the front valance under the front bumper at some point as shown in the photos. The hood and roof are in good shape. All of the glass is good, windows and doors work as they should. Mirrors are good. I've owned this truck since new, so I am positive that the mileage is correct. The truck was only driven at times, mostly for local commutes. It has never been wrecked, just neglected. It is not inspected, but should pass with very little work (if they okay the tires). I am selling this as is. Feel free to come see it or test drive it. It really actually could make someone a nice little truck with a little cleaning, bodywork, etc. Don't let my description turn you off if looking for an inexpensive truck. I'm just tired of it sitting around and want it gone.
Chevrolet S-10 for Sale
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Zalac Towing & Recovery ★★★★★
Young`s Auto Transit ★★★★★
Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★
Used Cars ★★★★★
Tri State Transmissions ★★★★★
Trail Automotive Group ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM execs fired over fraudulent India emissions testing
Mon, 29 Jul 2013General Motors hadn't had a recall in India since 1995. That changed when it was discovered that certain employees were playing tricks with local emissions testing in order to ensure passing grades for engines. More than ten GM Powertrain employees in India and the US have been let go over the ensuing emissions flap, including Sam Winegarden, VP of global engine engineering, a man who has been with the company since 1969, leading development of some marquee powerplants.
According to Automotive News, an internal investigation revealed that employees "violated testing procedures," sometimes swapping specially prepared low-emissions engines during testing regimes for the Chevrolet Tavera SUV equipped with the 2.0-liter and 2.5-liter engines. Employees were also manipulating weights in order to get vehicles placed into different emissions categories. The discovery has led to GM recall the 114,000 Taveras produced over an eight-year period and halting their production and sale.
The Economic Times of India reports that the issue is due to "a faulty component." GM has developed a solution to the issue, and once it is validated in testing and approved by the Indian authorities, the recalled vehicles will be fixed at dealers and production will resume.
Camaro chief: 'rock-star' 4-cylinder set for Mustang fight
Wed, Jul 8 2015It was inevitable, the 2016 Chevy Camaro had to have a four-cylinder engine. The archrival Ford Mustang packs a spunky 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-banger, and everyone from BMW to Subaru uses four-cylinders to great effect to power their sports cars. Now it's Chevy's turn. Again. The Camaro ran the infamous Iron Duke four-cylinder with 88 to 92 horsepower in the 1980s. It was a fuel-economy play at a time when performance was not a priority. After the 1970s muscle-car era, output even for the V8s didn't top 200 hp again until the mid-'80s. Thankfully for enthusiasts, things have changed dramatically in the last 30 years. The gen six Camaro will offer a 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder with 275 horsepower. It's the standard engine, slotting below the 335-hp V6 and the 455-hp V8. But don't mistake the new I4 for an Iron Duke encore. Camaro chief engineer Al Oppenheiser called it a "rock star" and said cars equipped with it feel lighter than V6 models. The four-cylinder (295 pound-feet at 3,000-4,500 rpm) also summons more torque in quicker fashion than the V6 (284 lb-ft at 5,300 rpm). Chevy expects the Camaro to hit 60 miles per hour in "well under six seconds," according to press materials. The Mustang EcoBoost (310 hp, 320 lb-ft) clocks times in the low to mid five-second range. "We're not doing it just so we have one," Oppenheiser said. "We're not doing it because like in gen three you're forced to do it because of fuel economy. We're doing it because it belongs in the car. It has a distinct character." Speaking with Autoblog recently at the Detroit Grand Prix racecourse on Belle Isle, Oppenheiser said he expects the I4 to attract a younger crowd to the Camaro and will put up stiff competition against the V6 for sales. "I've read blogs where younger folks won't buy a Camaro because it doesn't have a 2.0-liter turbo or a turbocharged four-cylinder," he said. "So we're going to excite them." While we talked a lot about four-cylinder engines, Oppenheiser also elaborated on the V6 (It's pretty damn good, too. We drove it.) and the new Alpha platform that the Camaro borrowed from Cadillac. Here's the rest of our edited conversation. Autoblog: Talk a little bit about the four-cylinder – the first turbo four-cylinder ever for Camaro. Do you have any idea what the take rate's going to be? Al Oppenheiser: I think it's going to surprise a lot of people. It's actually a fun car to drive. It's got a really good balance of turbo noise and exhaust note.
Best car infotainment systems: From UConnect to MBUX, these are our favorites
Sun, Jan 7 2024Declaring one infotainment system the best over any other is an inherently subjective matter. You can look at quantitative testing for things like input response time and various screen load times, but ask a room full of people that have tried all car infotainment systems what their favorite is, and you’re likely to get a lot of different responses. For the most part, the various infotainment systems available all share a similar purpose. They aim to help the driver get where they're going with navigation, play their favorite tunes via all sorts of media playback options and allow folks to stay connected with others via phone connectivity. Of course, most go way beyond the basics these days and offer features like streaming services, in-car performance data and much more. Unique features are aplenty when you start diving through menus, but how they go about their most important tasks vary widely. Some of our editors prefer systems that are exclusively touch-based and chock full of boundary-pushing features. Others may prefer a back-to-basics non-touch system that is navigable via a scroll wheel. You can compare it to the phone operating system wars. Just like some prefer Android phones over iPhones, we all have our own opinions for what makes up the best infotainment interface. All that said, our combined experience tells us that a number of infotainment systems are at least better than the rest. WeÂ’ve narrowed it down to five total systems in their own subcategories that stand out to us. Read on below to see our picks, and feel free to make your own arguments in the comments. Best infotainment overall: UConnect 5, various Stellantis products Ram 1500 Uconnect Infotainment System Review If thereÂ’s one infotainment system that all of us agree is excellent, itÂ’s UConnect. It has numerous qualities that make it great, but above all else, UConnect is simple and straightforward to use. Ease of operation is one of the most (if not the single most) vital parts of any infotainment system interface. If youÂ’re expected to be able to tap away on a touchscreen while driving and still pay attention to the road, a complex infotainment system is going to remove your attention from the number one task at hand: driving. UConnect uses a simple interface that puts all of your key functions in a clearly-represented row on the bottom of the screen. Tap any of them, and it instantly pulls up that menu.














1989 chevrolet s-10 cameo
S-10 chevy .
1987 chevrolet s10 street or strip 406ci, power glide, 8 point cage, dana 60 456
Chevy s10 extended cab ls 4x4 third door great mileage great on gas very clean
1990 chevy s10 lowrider
Pro street s10 twin turbo ls1