Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1982 Chevrolet Malibu on 2040-cars

US $6,000.00
Year:1982 Mileage:7000 Color:
Location:

Clinton, Wisconsin, United States

Clinton, Wisconsin, United States
Advertising:

 1982 G Body Chevrolet Malibu 4 door for sale.  It's not perfect, but does look good, gets a lot of attention and is a blast to drive!  Exterior, interior and all mechanicals restored in 2010 and no, it's not a real cop car.  Call or text 262-325-6120 with questions or to set up a time check it out.  Non-refundable deposit of $500 required within 48 hours. Balance to be paid with cash or cashier's check.

Details:

Engine (not a diesel as shown in item specifics) - Estimated 400hp 350 bored 0.040 over, all new rotating assembly, ported vortec heads with undercut valves and 9:1 compression, Comp Cams extreme energy XE262 cam, Comp valvetrain and roller rockers, Edelbrock performer rpm air gap intake, Holley street avenger 670 carb with choke removed, complete MSD ignition, Flowtech headers, Pypes dual exhaust

Drivetrain - TH350 with B&M stage 2 shift kit, B&M holeshot 2400 converter, 3.73 limited slip rearend

Other Mechanical - New shocks, new rear springs, manual steering conversion, F41 front triangulation braces, large factory front sway bar, factory rear sway bar, new brakes including all lines, air conditioning is not hooked up and all engine parts are removed

Exterior - Patriot blue PPG paint completed in 2010, a few dings and scratches but still looks good, Goodmark steel cowl induction hood, all new grill and headlight trim, restored stainless trim, new exterior door handles, 15x7 front and 15x8 rear steel rally wheels with Cooper Cobra tires

Interior - Cutlass front bucket and rear seats, Monte Carlo console with integrated B&M quicksilver shifter, new carpet, redone headliner, dyed door panels and dash, no sun visors, Pioneer CD receiver with I Pod connector in the console, Kicker 3.5 and 6x9 speakers, Kicker 8" subwoofer, water temp gauge needs a new sender, pics show white face gauges but factory black ones are installed currently, if purchaser wants they can take the white ones too

Auto Services in Wisconsin

Versus Paint & Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: N4420 French Rd, Combined-Locks
Phone: (920) 380-8704

U S Speed Research ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Racing & Sports Cars
Address: 2810 E Eaton Ln, Racine
Phone: (414) 744-7166

Topel`s Towing & Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1110 S Main St, Lake-Mills
Phone: (920) 648-8115

Tj`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Customizing
Address: 703 S Watertown St, Brandon
Phone: (920) 324-3440

Swant Graber Ford ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1697 E Division Ave, Cameron
Phone: (715) 537-9500

Sebring Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6005 W Howard Ave, Big-Bend
Phone: (414) 321-9235

Auto blog

Chevy Colorado, GMC Canyon get updated tachometers due to graphical error

Sun, Feb 8 2015

After James Bearing bought a Chevrolet Colorado, he noticed a discrepancy between the truck's spec sheet and the truck's tachometer: Chevrolet said 3.6-liter V6 in the little pickup produces 305 horsepower at 6,800 rpm, but the the tachometer indicates a redline at 6,500 rpm. So either he wasn't making as much power as he was promised, or the tachometer display was incorrect. Bearing said he asked Chevy about it but got no response. Until now. A General Motors spokesman said the rev limiter is indeed set for 6,800 rpm, but the tach graphics "are slightly off" in the Colorado and the GMC Canyon, and submitted an SAE horsepower certification to back him up. If you're wondering how such a thing got past quality control... well, let's just say you're not alone. GM is going to fix "the graphics on future trucks," which makes it sound like Bearing will just have to learn to live with the indicated redline he's got. He could always pretend he's driving a sleeper, with four more ponies waiting to be unlocked in the danger zone for those who dare. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2015 Chevrolet Colorado: First Drive View 38 Photos Related Gallery 2015 GMC Canyon: Quick Spin View 27 Photos News Source: Auto Guide Auto News Chevrolet GM GMC Truck gmc canyon

1983 Motorweek showdown pits Porsche 928S vs. Chevy Camaro Z28

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Last month, Motor Trend threw the Camaro Z/28 and Porsche 911 GT3 into the bear pit and let them fight it out. Way back in 1983, MotorWeek had the same idea, comparing the Camaro Z/28 to the Porsche 928S. At the time, the Camaro was America's best selling sports coupe, the 928S was Porsche's top-of-the-line model that also had the highest top speed of any car sold here. And the price differential was even more stark then: $13,600 for the Camaro, $45,000 for the Porsche. That put the Z/28's cast-iron, 5.0-liter V8 with 190 horsepower and 240 pound-feet of torque against the all-aluminum 4.7-liter V8 with 234 hp and 263 lb-ft in the 928S. Even with that and the Camaro being 14 inches longer than the Porsche, the American was a surprising 40 pounds lighter than the German. The show took them to Summit Point Raceway in West Virginia to see how close a relative performance bargain could hang with a the German GT. Both had five-speed manual transmissions, but the high-speed corners and tight sections of Summit Point would test other handling variables, including the "bone-rattling" Camaro's solid rear axle and disc and drum brake setup vis-a-vis the four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension on the "firm-but-smooth" Porsche. Paradoxically, the larger disparity 22 years ago resulted in a closer result. Check out the video to see how the Summit was won. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Porsche Coupe Luxury Performance Classics Videos chevy camaro z28 porsche 928 retro review

Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015

Tue, Feb 11 2014

Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.