2002 Pearl White Cadillac Deville Dhs *no Reserve* Cold A/c *fully Loaded* on 2040-cars
Conway, South Carolina, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.6L V8 DOHC 32V
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Cadillac
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: DeVille
Trim: DHS
Options: Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Drive Type: FWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 129,962
Exterior Color: Pearl White
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
The tires are in great shape and have plenty of tread left.
If you have any questions feel free to ask.
| Trim Level | DHS | Manufactured in | UNITED STATES |
| Body Style | SEDAN 4-DR | Engine Type | 4.6L V8 DOHC 32V |
| Driveline | FWD | Tank | 18.50 gallon |
| City MPG | 18 miles/gallon | Highway MPG | 27 miles/gallon |
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS | Steering Type | R&P |
| Front Brake Type | Disc | Rear Brake Type | Disc |
| Turning Diameter | 40.20 in. | Front Suspension | Ind |
| Rear Suspension | Ind | Front Spring Type | Coil |
| Rear Spring Type | Coil | Tires | 225/60R16 |
| Front Headroom | 39.10 in. | Rear Headroom | 38.40 in. |
| Front Legroom | 42.40 in. | Rear Legroom | 43.20 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 60.40 in. | Rear Shoulder Room | 60.10 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.40 in. | Rear Hip Room | 56.70 in. |
| Curb Weight | 4049 lbs | Curb Weight | |
| Overall Length | 207.20 in. | Overall Width | 74.50 in. |
| Overall Height | 56.70 in. | Wheelbase | 115.30 in. |
| Ground Clearance | 5.30 in. | Track Front | 62.70 in. |
| Track Rear | 62.20 in. | Cargo Length | |
| Width at Wheelwell | | Width at Wall | |
| Depth | | Standard Seating | 6 |
| Optional Seating | | Passenger Volume | 115.30 cu.ft. |
| Cargo Volume | 19.10 cu.ft. | Standard Towing | 2000 lbs |
| Maximum Towing | 2000 lbs | Standard Payload | |
| Maximum Payload | | Standard GVWR | |
| Maximum GVWR | | Warranty Duration | 48 month |
| Warranty Distance | 50,000 mile | Powertrain Warranty Duration | 48 month |
| Powertrain Warranty Distance | 50,000 mile | Rust-duration | 72 month |
| Rust-distance | 100,000 mile | MSRP | $47,880 USD |
| Dealer Invoice | $43,810 USD | Destination Charge | |
| Child Safety Door Locks | Standard | Locking Pickup Truck Tailgate | |
| Power Door Locks | Standard | Vehicle Anti-Theft | Standard |
| 4WD/AWD | | ABS Brakes | Standard |
| Automatic Load-Leveling | Standard | Electronic Brake Assistance | |
| Limited Slip Differential | | Locking Differential | |
| Traction Control | Standard | Vehicle Stability Control System | Optional |
| Driver Airbag | Standard | Front Side Airbag | Standard |
| Front Side Airbag with Head Protection | | Passenger Airbag | Standard |
| Side Head Curtain Airbag | | Second Row Side Airbag | Optional |
| Second Row Side Airbag with Head Protection | | Electronic Parking Aid | Optional |
| First Aid Kit | | Trunk Anti-Trap Device | Standard |
| Keyless Entry | Standard | Remote Ignition | |
| Air Conditioning | Standard | Separate Driver/Front Passenger Climate Controls | Standard |
| Cruise Control | Standard | Tachometer | Standard |
| Tilt Steering | Standard | Tilt Steering Column | Standard |
| Heated Steering Wheel | | Leather Steering Wheel | Standard |
| Steering Wheel Mounted Controls | Standard | Telescopic Steering Column | Standard |
| Adjustable Foot Pedals | | Genuine Wood Trim | Standard |
| Tire Pressure Monitor | Standard | Trip Computer | Standard |
| AM/FM Radio | Standard | Cassette Player | Standard |
| CD Player | Standard | CD Changer | Optional |
| DVD Player | | Voice Activated Telephone | Standard |
| Navigation Aid | Optional | Second Row Sound Controls | |
| Subwoofer | Standard | Telematics System | Standard |
| Driver Multi-Adjustable Power Seat | Standard | Front Cooled Seat | |
| Front Heated Seat | Standard | Front Power Lumbar Support | Standard |
| Front Power Memory Seat | Standard | Front Split Bench Seat | Standard |
| Leather Seat | Standard | Passenger Multi-Adjustable Power Seat | Standard |
| Second Row Folding Seat | | Second Row Heated Seat | Standard |
| Second Row Multi-Adjustable Power Seat | | Second Row Removable Seat | |
| Third Row Removable Seat | | Cargo Area Cover | |
| Cargo Area Tiedowns | Standard | Cargo Net | Standard |
| Load Bearing Exterior Rack | Optional | Pickup Truck Bed Liner | |
| Power Sunroof | Optional | Removable Top | |
| Manual Sunroof | Optional | Automatic Headlights | Standard |
| Daytime Running Lights | Standard | Fog Lights |
Cadillac DeVille for Sale
1977 cadillac deville ( low mileage )(US $6,000.00)
1969 cadillac deville base convertible 2-door 7.7l (low miles)(US $15,000.00)
1969 cadillac coupe deville convertible runs and drives excellent cruise in king
1997 cadillac deville concours 4.6l sfi dohc ho 8cyl
1974 cadillac sedan de ville andes copper/terra cotta 82,200 original miles
Dts one fl owned 81k mi leather heated seats chromes console immaculate puff!!(US $7,950.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wingard Towing Service ★★★★★
Wilkins Motor Company ★★★★★
USA Tire & Auto Care ★★★★★
Sumter County Customs ★★★★★
Stroman Welding & Auto Repair ★★★★★
Spearman Brothers Collision Repair & Refinishing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Cadillac CT4 Luggage Test | How much fits in the trunk?
Fri, Dec 4 2020If you go by exterior specs, the Cadillac CT4 is more similar to a BMW 3 Series or Mercedes C-Class. However, if you go by interior space (or price), it's more like a Mercedes A-Class or BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe. That's definitely true of the trunk, which measures a rinky-dink 10.9 cubic feet, according to GM's specs. That number is what you'd expect in a small luxury coupe rather than a sedan. Indeed, the old ATS Coupe had 10.4 cubic feet.Β Nevertheless, the CT4 is somehow not the smallest in the segment. That would be the A-Class and its 8.9-cubic-foot trunk. Good grief. Now, Mercedes has been known to shortchange its cargo capacity numbers so we'll have to luggage test that at some point to know for sure. Today, let's see if the CT4 is in keeping with that 10.9 number. Also, how much worse is it than the also rinky-dink CT5 trunk or the overly optimistic 2 Series Gran Coupe? Yep, that looks pretty small. Also, note the weird rail-like things that hampered the CT5 (below right) are also present here in the CT4 (below left). There's also a similar lip to clear for the folding back seat, but the CT4's opening seems bigger.Β As in every luggage test I do, I use two midsize roller suitcases that would need to be checked in at the airport (26 inches long, 16 wide, 11 deep), two roll-aboard suitcases that just barely fit in the overhead (24L x 15W x 10D), and one smaller roll-aboard that fits easily (23L x 15W x 10D). I also include my wife's fancy overnight bag just to spruce things up a bit (21L x 12W x 12D). All but the biggest bag fit, which is exactly the same number that could fit in the CT5. As the below photo shows, the bigger car has just a bit more space left over. Maybe for a pair of grocery bags. That would be consistent with the difference in cubic feet: 11.9 cubic feet versus 10.9. What about the BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe? BMW says it has 15.1 cubic feet of space, but it doesn't. At least not using the same measurement criteria that the vast majority of other manufacturers use. It canΒ carry the biggest bag, but it would still need to leave the fancy bag behind. That's also while utilizing the 2 GC's ample under-floor storage compartment.Β As such, the CT4 does indeed have a small trunk, but it's at least in keeping with its competitors. The CT5 cannot say that, regardless of which segment you compare it to.Β Unfortunately for the CT4, though, the story does not stop here.
Cadillac's Johan de Nysschen clarifies a few points on the brand's future
Mon, Mar 19 2018Last week, Motor Trend ran coverage on a journo roundtable with Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen. During the roundtable, de Nysschen cited a few reasons for the decline in sedan sales, including gas prices, "young consumers" read, millennials Β less interested in driving dynamics than lifestyle accessories, and the state of U.S. infrastructure. Jalopnik homed in on the last two reasons, and those became the story, including here in our post on the roundtable. So de Nysschen called Jalopnik to add more context. The original reaction pieces painted de Nysschen's rationales as an excuse for sporty sedans not selling well, when the issue is Cadillac's sporty sedans not selling well. His main clarification: "I wasn't advocating the idea that the world is black and white, that if you're a young buyer a millennial or a teenager that you don't enjoy driving." On that note, it would be ridiculous to deny millennial and sedan-segment bugbears; de Nysschen has market research and the industry-wide, rabbit-like crossover breeding program to back him up. Yet even as he touted the success of the XT5, noting that it's "the third-best-selling luxury nameplate in the U.S. after the Lexus RX, and the Mercedes C-Class," he could add, "But the irony is not lost on me that the C-Class is a sedan." The circumstances laid out in the follow-up piece inject more likely color into the situation: the brand's onetime, singleminded focus on the U.S., followed by a singleminded focus on China that left the U.S. market wanting for attention. We could add to that: years of lackluster products and awful attempts at volume and brand engineering under the old GM at the same time that downsized premium luxury products, crossovers, and SUVs began their rocketship trajectories; trying to live off the Escalade success; and the carmaker's desire not to offend its older, traditional buyers while concurrently wooing "coastal influencers." De Nysschen also acknowledged that Cadillac interiors aren't where they need to be, saying, "We recognize that's where we want to improve." The result, as de Nysschen put it, "We're playing with the hand that we've been dealt.
Dodge Dart falls short of Consumer Reports Recommended, Caddy XTS and Lincoln MKS, too
Thu, 22 Nov 2012The Dodge Dart, Cadillac XTS and Lincoln MKS all failed to earn a "Recommended" rating from Consumer Reports. When it came to the compact Dart, the organization's testers thought the vehicle offered a quiet cabin, solid-feeling chassis and nimble suspension, but the new model ultimately fell short of the coveted rating due to powertrain issues. The institute's reviewers found the base 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine to be underpowered and noted "drivability issues" when the available turbocharged 1.4-liter four was paired with the optional dual-clutch transmission (some of our editors disliked it paired with the six-speed manual). CR also dinged the latter powerplant for sounding "raspy." For what it's worth, we think the forced-induction engine offers an excellent and playful exhaust note, but that's just us.
As for the XTS, CR lauded the car for its luxurious cabin, but the vehicle's experience was dulled by its finicky CUE infotainment interface. Overall, the big Cadillac scored much higher than its cross-town rival from Lincoln. While testers found the American luxury sedan to offer a quiet ride and quality fit and finish, they felt the MKS delivered a "cramped driving position, ungainly handling, uncomposed ride, and limited visibility." Ouch. At the end of the day, both cars fell short of rivals from Japan, Germany and Korea. Check out the full press release below with more details, along with CR's musings on the Chevrolet Spark and Lexus ES.























