Solar Roof+leather+navigation+jbl Premium Sound+bluetooth+rear Camera+warranty!! on 2040-cars
Riverside, California, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:1.8Liter Gas/electricHybrid
For Sale By:A Buyers Choice Vehicle sales (dealer)
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Toyota
Model: Prius
Options: Premium JBL Navigation, Premium Genuine Leather (Not softex imitation), Bluetooth Audio Music Playback thru radio, Bluetooth Hand Free Phone Calling, xm sirius satellite radio, JBL Premium Sound System, Live Traffic data shows on Nav screen with subs, outside door handles with touch-sensor lock/unloc, Color Backup Camera, Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player
Trim: 4 Premium IV Solar Roof w Navigation, Leather, JBL
Safety Features: Star Safety System, Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), Smart Stop Technology (SST), LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren), Child-protector rear door locks, Energy-absorbing collapsible steering column, Side-impact door beams, Tire Pressure Monitor System (TPMS), Hill Start Assist Control (HAC), Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Brake Assist (BA), Power Lumbar Seat adjustment, Power Sunroof, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: Hybrid Synergy Driver FWD
Mileage: 47,859
Warranty: Toyota remaining warranty valid to 15yr 150,000 mi
Sub Model: 4 Premium IV Solar Roof w Navigation, Leather, JBL
Hybrid Battery Warranty: up to 10 years or 150,000 miles
Exterior Color: Gray
Hybrid System Warranty: up to 8 years or 100,000 miles
Interior Color: Grey
Emmissions warranty: up to 15 years or 150,000 miles
Number of Cylinders: 4
Powertrain Warranty: up to 5 years or 60,000 miles
Toyota Prius for Sale
2010 toyota prius hybrid like new 51mpg save on gas 50k miles!!!(US $13,999.00)
2012 toyota prius iv hybrid heated leather navigation bluetooth rear camera wow!(US $19,750.00)
07 toyota prius back-upcamera smartkey clean 1-owner!!(US $7,689.00)
2010 toyota prius iii low miles - 20k! only - clean title(US $17,500.00)
2004 03 toyota prius navigation 1 owner super clean 41mpg gas saver no reserve !
2010 toyota prius iv hatchback 4-door 1.8l fully loaded -11k miles - clean dmv(US $21,500.00)
Auto Services in California
Yes Auto Glass ★★★★★
Yarbrough Brothers Towing ★★★★★
Xtreme Liners Spray-on Bedliners ★★★★★
Wolf`s Foreign Car Service Inc ★★★★★
White Oaks Auto Repair ★★★★★
Warner Transmissions ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.
2015 Toyota Camry ushers in 'sweeping redesign' [w/poll]
Wed, 16 Apr 2014With a dozen years atop the nation's best-selling car charts, you might think that there wouldn't be a lot of incentive for Toyota to rework its Camry, particularly so early in the life of the current model. But despite its unassailable sales totals, the midsize sedan has come in for substantial criticism for its milquetoast dynamics, piecemeal interiors and bland design.
As part of CEO Akio Toyoda's mantra to build more exciting cars, the 2015 Camry has arrived with a fresh new look and content that goes far beyond the Japanese automaker's typically slight mid-cycle redesigns. Featuring some 2,000 new parts, the 2015 Camry casts a 1.8-inch longer shadow and stretches across a widened track (0.4 inches). And it won't be just the widened track that should help deliver a more dynamic performance - Toyota is citing a stiffer chassis thanks to additional spot welds along with a rejiggered suspension, retuned electric power steering and a new two-stage brake booster for improved braking feel.
A new XSE trim promises the sportiest performance yet, including model-specific shock absorbers and springs, stiffer bushings, unique stability control programming and 18-inch wheels to go along with a unique front end treatment featuring mesh grille inserts and a revised fascia.
Autoblog Minute: VW Q3 financial woes, 2015 Tokyo Motor Show
Fri, Oct 30 2015Consumer Reports pulls its Tesla recommendation, the U.S. Copyright Office offers a ruling affecting car owners, VW gets hit hard with third-quarter losses, and lots of exciting news from Tokyo. Autoblog senior editor Greg Migliore reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute Weekly Recap. Show full video transcript text [00:00:00] Consumer Reports pulls its Tesla recommendation, the U.S. copyright office offers a ruling that affects car owners and gear heads, VW gets hit hard with third-quarter losses, and lots of exciting news from Tokyo. I'm senior editor Greg Migliore and this is your Autoblog Minute Weekly Recap. After a week away testing vehicles for Autoblog's Tech of the Year award, we're back in the office to recap the week in automotive news. [00:00:30] One of the things you might have missed was Consumer Reports pulling its recommendation of Tesla's Model S sedan. The blemish for Tesla comes after a tally of reviews from customer surveys. The most common problem areas for the Model S as cited by survey takers included: the drivetrain, power equipment, charging equipment, body and sunroof squeaks, rattles, and leaks. So lots of stuff. Though they could not ignore a score of "worse-than-average", Consumer Reports still [00:01:00] highlighted the fact that the Model S was "the best performing car" they've ever tested. Telsa CEO Elon Musk took to social media to defend his sedans saying: "Consumer Reports reliability survey includes a lot of early production cars. Already addressed in new cars." And, "Tesla gets top rating of any company in service. Most important, CR says 97% of owners expect their next car to be a Tesla (the acid test)." In Financial news, Volkswagen took a hit and reported an operating loss of [00:01:30] $3.84 billion. This is the first such loss for VW in 15 years. Toyota reclaimed the crown as the world's largest automaker as well. It's important that it's not all doom and gloom for VW though in Q3. Sales revenues were up and the company's automotive division boasts $30 billion dollars in liquid assets. It's a sizable war chest that will no doubt come in handy, as the company has yet to feel the full brunt of the diesel emissions scandal. Good news for gear heads. The US copyright office [00:02:00] ruled in favor of mechanics and car owners by granting an exception to existing copyright law. The law was originally meant to prevent software pirating and bootlegging of Hollywood movies.