2003 Saab 9-5 2.3t, Automatic, Phenominal Condition! 2 Keys, Ready To Go! on 2040-cars
Lodi, New Jersey, United States
Engine:2.3L 2290CC 140Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Turbocharged
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Unspecified
Warranty: Unspecified
Make: Saab
Model: 9-5
Options: Sunroof
Trim: Linear Sedan 4-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Power Options: Power Windows
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 158,093
Number of Doors: 4
Sub Model: 4dr Sdn Line
Exterior Color: Silver
Number of Cylinders: 4
Interior Color: Black
Saab 9-5 for Sale
2004 saab 9-5 , saab 95 , aero, station wagon, autom.
2002 saab 9-5 linear 2.3 ltr turbo clean carfax one owner xtra clean serviced(US $4,200.00)
2003 saab 9-5 linear sedan 4-door 2.3l turbo no reserve very good car leather
1999 saab 9-5 2.3l sedan se 4-door(US $2,800.00)
Saab 9-5 arc turbo 1 owner southern owned low miles only 71 k miles no reserver
2000 saab 9-5 aero 2.3l turbo 5-speed manual(US $2,850.00)
Auto Services in New Jersey
Woodbridge Transmissions ★★★★★
Werbany Tire And Auto Repair ★★★★★
Vonkattengell Transmission Service ★★★★★
True Racks Ltd ★★★★★
Top Dude Tint ★★★★★
TM & T Tire ★★★★★
Auto blog
Spyker files $3 billion lawsuit against General Motors over Saab's demise
Mon, 06 Aug 2012"Smack." That's the sound of Spyker's process server dropping a big ol' pile of legal documents on the doorstep of The Renaissance Center, home of General Motors - or wherever GM's attorneys live during business hours. Contained therein is a Complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and demanding a jury trial, that seeks $3 billion in damages due to "the unlawful actions GM took to avoid competition with Saab Automobile in the Chinese market." Spyker accuses GM of "tortiously interfering" with Saab's business relationship with Chinese automaker Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile (Youngman), actions that Spyker CEO Victor Muller (above) said "deliberately drove Saab Automobile into bankruptcy."
(From Wikipedia: "Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when a person intentionally damages the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships.")
The interference in question specifically refers to the very last potential deal, called the Framework Agreement, that Spyker worked out with Youngman. With lots of GM engineering embedded into the 9-4X and 9-5, The General had the right to approve any Saab partnership that would involve the transfer of GM intellectual property. Spyker had been rebuffed over every previous deal with a Chinese firm, including two bids by Youngman, due to GM concerns over its IP getting into Chinese hands and having to face Chinese-market competitors using its technology. The Complaint alleges that the Framework Agreement would have put a firewall around all GM IP - Youngman would only work on Saab's Phoenix platform, said to be just about free of GM tech, and would have no access to 9-3, 9-4X or 9-5 technology until after Saab ceased all ties to GM.
Saab US bankruptcy plan gets legal green-light
Thu, 18 Jul 2013It feels utterly bizarre that we're still talking about Saab, but Reuters is reporting that the bankrupt Swedish manufacturer's American arm has gotten approval from the US Bankruptcy Court to liquidate its assets and pay back creditors. As part of the plan, secured creditors like Ally Financial will receive full repayment. Unsecured creditors, consisting of those affected by abandoned leases and contracts will get anywhere from 25 to 82 percent of their money back.
There are currently $77 million in unsecured claims, according to Reuters, but that number doesn't include claims from former Saab dealers. Naturally, the entire affair is full of lawyers and legalese. A trust formed on the Saab side will be negotiating with creditors and their affiliates in an attempt to reduce claims against Saab. This sounds like the start of a long and sordid affair...
GM wins appeal, dismissal of $3B Saab-related Spyker suit
Sun, Oct 26 2014It's been a long time since we last heard of the legal battles between Spyker CEO Victor Muller and General Motors, the automaker from which Muller's company purchased the embattled Saab brand back in 2010. To refresh your memories, after struggling through 2011 and entering into bankruptcy, Spyker attempted to save the Saab brand by selling it to a Chinese consortium. General Motors, though, blocked the sale because it did not want any of its intellectual property, of which Saab was in possession of from its days under the GM umbrella, in the hands of a potential rival automaker. Spyker then sued GM for intentionally blocking what it said was Saab's only chance of survival. The $3-billion suit was dismissed after a judge ruled in favor of GM, which apparently had granted a license to Saab to continue building cars using its technologies, but reserved the right to cancel that agreement if Saab again changed hands. Spyker appealed, and, according to Reuters, the appeals court upheld the previous ruling, again siding with GM. National Electric Vehicle Sweden, the company that eventually purchased Saab out of bankruptcy, managed to restart production for a short period before itself falling into financial trouble. We have at least another month to wait before hearing how Saab's next chapter may read.