2008 Porsche 911 Carrera 4s Cabriolet Msrp $113,980 21k Miles Only $64,888.00!!! on 2040-cars
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
Engine:3.8L Flat-6 355 HP
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Porsche
Number of Cylinders: 6
Model: 911
Drive Type: AWD
Warranty: No
Mileage: 21,600
Sub Model: Carrera 4S Cabriolet
Exterior Color: White
Porsche 911 for Sale
- 2012 porsche 911 carrera s cab 991, 2,845 miles, msrp $132,635.00, only $112,888(US $112,888.00)
- Nav,convertible, low miles, hard top, tiptronic, 996(US $59,988.00)
- 1989 porsche 911 carrera cabriolet
- 2011 porsche 911 turbo s coupe pdk 19 wheels nav bose meteor grey metallic
- 2010 blue 911 carrera, low miles, one owner, pasm, carrera wheels, bose sound!
- 1999 porsche 911 carrera cabriolet, hard top, aero/carbon packages, low miles!!!(US $25,000.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Western Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
St Louis Car & Credit ★★★★★
St Louis Auto Parts Co ★★★★★
Specialty Automotive ★★★★★
SL Services Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
J.D. Power: Vehicle dependability at all-time high, Lexus and Porsche lead
Wed, 13 Feb 2013
Each year, J.D. Power and Associates surveys original owners of three-year-old vehicles to find out what kinds of problems they have had experienced over the last 12 months, and then it uses this data to create its annual Vehicle Dependability Study. This means that the models in the 2013 study are 2010 model year vehicles, and J.D. Power rates each make as well as the top individual models based on how many problems were experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100).
Debunking the idea that carryover models are more dependable than new or updated models, the 2013 study found that the average carryover model experienced 133 PP100, while all-new or redesigned vehicles for the 2010 model year had 116 PP100; vehicles that received minor changes fared the best with just 111 PP100. The overall average for all makes was 126 PP100, which is the lowest figure since the findings were first issued in 1989.
Porsche Macan fails moose test, Stuttgart responds
Tue, 14 Oct 2014Different countries have different safety standards, but most of them revolve around a similar set of tests: front impact, side impact, offset impact, rollover... the usual. But Sweden has its own test. It's called the Moose Test (or the Elk Test), and it's unique to Scandinavia: a car has to be able to avoid a theoretical antlered mammal on the road while traveling at 43.5 miles per hour and return to its previous course without flipping over. The Jeep Grand Cherokee ran afoul of the uniquely Nordic maneuver a couple of years ago, but even more surprising is the way the Porsche Macan has reacted.
Under testing by Sweden's Teknikens Värld, Porsche's downsized crossover - specifically the Macan S Diesel, for what it's worth - didn't flip over, but it skidded off course. In real-world conditions, it follows, the vehicle could run off the road or into oncoming traffic. The testers ran the test several times, and even removed excess weight from the vehicle, and each time it reacted the same way.
In response, Porsche has explained that the behavior is the result of its Active Rollover Protection system kicking in. When the system detects that the vehicle could drastically oversteer, flip over or lose its tire, it momentarily applies the brake on the front outside wheel, allowing the vehicle to shed the cornering forces without losing it completely.
Roger Rodas' widow suing Porsche over Carrera GT crash
Tue, 13 May 2014
Investigations undertaken by local law enforcement may have vindicated Porsche from any wrongdoing in the crash that killed actor Paul Walker and racing driver Roger Rodas last year, but the latter's widow is apparently not convinced. According to emerging reports, Kristine Rodas has filed a lawsuit seeking unspecified damages from Porsche Cars North America.
In her suit filed with the Los Angeles Superior Court, Rodas' attorney Mark Geragos reportedly disputes the findings of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, which asserted that the vehicle was traveling at an unsafe speed of 90 miles per hour on city streets, identifying the speed as the cause of the accident. Instead the lawsuit claims that the vehicle was only going 55 mph and that the cause of the crash was improper equipment - namely a faulty right rear suspension and the lack of a crash cage and proper fuel tank.