Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1971 Ford Fairlane Torino on 2040-cars

Year:1971 Mileage:44472 Color: EMERALD GREEN /
 Green
Location:

Kingwood, West Virginia, United States

Kingwood, West Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:351 CLEVELAND
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1A34H276665
Year: 1971
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Torino
Trim: 2 DOOR
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 44,472
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: EMERALD GREEN
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Green

I AM LISTING THIS CAR FOR A FRIEND. I HAVE LOOKED AT IT AND TOOK ALL THE PICTURES. EVERYTHING THAT I KNOW ABOUT IT IS IN THE DESCRIPTION. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE YOU CAN CALL 1-304-329-4699 ASK FOR BILL. OFFERED FOR SALE IS A 1971 FORD FAIRLANE TORINO, 351 CLEVELAND 2 BBL ENGINE, WITH 44,472 MILES. CAR IS FROM FLORIDA AND SURE THAT THESE ARE THE ORIGINAL MILES ON IT. THE CONDITION OF THE CAR PRETTY MUCH SHOWS THIS FOR SURE. HAS A C-4 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, NEW EXHAUST, FACTORY AIR/ BUT NEEDS BELT ON IT. DRUM BRAKES, AIR SHOCKS, NICE WHEELS WITH BRAND NEW TIRES N50-295-15's ON BACK. 225-15's ON FRONT. SOME RUST IS LOCATED ON RIGHT FLOOR BOARD UNDER DASH. EMERALD GREEN EXTERIOR/ GREEN INTERIOR IS IN ORIGINAL REALLY GOOD CONDITION. AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PICTURES. INTERIOR IS REALLY NICE, NOTHING BAD ABOUT IT TO BE NOTED. OVERALL THE CAR IS IN GOOD RUNNING CONDITION. BUYER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PICKUP OR SHIPPING. US $500.00 DEPOSIT WITHIN 3 DAYS OF AUCTION END. FULL PAYMENT OF BALANCE AND VEHICLE PICKUP IS REQUIRED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF AUCTION END. THANKS FOR LOOKING. PLEASE CALL 1-304-329-4699 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AND ASK FOR BILL.

Auto Services in West Virginia

Tire Outfitters ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2712 S Pleasant Valley Rd, Lehew
Phone: (540) 667-5406

Superior Chry-Plym-Dodge-Jeep Eagle Of Ashland Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1041 Greenup Ave, Kenova
Phone: (606) 393-4659

Quality Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 987 Ridgeview Dr, Pool
Phone: (304) 872-8003

Oesterle Auto Glass & Paint ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 801 Division St, Rockport
Phone: (304) 485-6351

Midas Auto Service Experts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 824 S Loudoun St, Lehew
Phone: (540) 665-0625

M & D Auto Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 400 County Rd, Weirton
Phone: (304) 797-1316

Auto blog

2020 Ford Explorer ST vs 2019 Dodge Durango SRT: How they compare on paper

Mon, Jan 14 2019

For a few years now, the Dodge Durango SRT has been the sole three-row performance crossover from a non-luxury brand. That all changes now that the 2020 Ford Explorer ST is coming to market. Now we have two family crossovers with rear-drive-based platforms vying for buyers that demand practicality and power. As such, there's no better time to dig into their specs to see how they compare. We'll check out each crossover's horsepower, torque, space, capability and prices. The full specs are listed below, followed by some analysis afterward. We also compared the regular 2020 Explorer models to other crossovers in this segment, if if that's not enough, you can check out our car comparison tool. Performance The Explorer and Durango go about making power in very different ways. The Explorer goes the force-fed route with two turbos feeding a 3.0-liter V6, while the Durango's enormous 6.4-liter V8 produces power with air flow au natural. Of the two, the Durango has the greater output of 475 ponies and 470 pound-feet of torque, feeding the flames of everyone that lives by the phrase "There's no replacement for displacement." The Explorer is no slouch at 400 horsepower and 415 pound-feet of torque, though. Performance isn't purely based on power, though. Other factors play a role, such as weight, and in that regard, the Explorer is way ahead. At 4,701 pounds, it weighs a massive 809 pounds less than the portly Durango. This also means that both crossovers are very close in weight-to-power ratio, with the Explorer only slightly worse at 11.75 pounds per horsepower and the Durango at 11.6. Less weight will also play a roll in handling, and the Explorer is likely to feel sprightlier without so much mass to shift back and forth. Semi-related to handling are tire sizes. The Durango features 295-mm wide tires on 20-inch wheels. The Explorer has 255-mm wide tires on 20-inch wheels, but 21-inch wheels with 275-mm tires are available. So the Durango is working with more contact patch, but as we mentioned, it's carrying a lot more weight. 2020 Ford Explorer ST View 20 Photos Interior Space and Practicality Although the Durango SRT is the largest on the outside in every dimension, it loses out to Explorer repeatedly inside. The Ford has more headroom, leg room and shoulder room in nearly every row except the third-row where headroom comes up a bit short.

Bosch fined $57.8 million by DOJ for price fixing and bid rigging

Tue, Mar 31 2015

The US Department of Justice has been investigating bid rigging and price fixing among automotive parts suppliers for years, and so far the agency has leveled nearly $2.5 billion in fines against 34 companies. The latest business to be caught in this ongoing crackdown is Germany's Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch), the world's largest independent auto component maker, and it agrees to pay a $57.8 million criminal fine to the Feds. According to the DOJ, Bosch has agreed to plead guilty to pricing fixing and bid rigging for spark plugs and oxygen sensors supplied to the former DaimlerChrysler, Ford and General Motors. The rigging is said to have occurred between January 2000 and July 2011. Bosch also allegedly played foul with starter motors sold to Volkswagen from January 2009 until at least June 2010. Bosch and other companies allegedly conspired on the pricing for bids to submit to automakers, and sold the parts at noncompetitive prices. The DOJ filed a one-count felony charge in US District Court for these actions. The company's plea is still subject to court approval, though. Bosch is only the third European company to be charged in this investigation, according to the DOJ. So far, many of the fined businesses have been from Japan, including Takata, NGK and others. Some execs have claimed price-fixing has been the standard operating procedure in the auto parts industry for a long time. Robert Bosch GmbH Agrees to Plead Guilty to Price Fixing and Bid Rigging on Automobile Parts Installed in U.S. Cars Robert Bosch GmbH, the world's largest independent parts supplier to the automotive industry, based in Gerlingen, Germany, has agreed to plead guilty and to pay a $57.8 million criminal fine for its role in a conspiracy to fix prices and rig bids for spark plugs, oxygen sensors and starter motors sold to automobile and internal combustion engine manufacturers in the United States and elsewhere, the Department of Justice announced today. According to the one-count felony charge filed today in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan, Bosch conspired to allocate the supply of, rig bids for, and to fix, stabilize and maintain the prices of, spark plugs and oxygen sensors sold to automobile and internal combustion engine manufacturers such as DaimlerChrysler AG, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Company and Andreas Stihl AG & Co., among others, in the United States and elsewhere.

Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch

Tue, 16 Jul 2013

A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.