Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1963 Ford T-bird on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:1963 Mileage:96897 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Perryville, Missouri, United States

Perryville, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Engine:390
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 3Y837140399 Year: 1963
Make: Ford
Model: Other Pickups
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Drive Type: automatic C6
Mileage: 96,897
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Blue
Number of Doors: 2
Interior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: thunderbird trim
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Up for sale is a 1963 T - bird complete with power steering and brakes, factory air.  Car is fairly solid for the year.  Take pictures of the rust spots which you may review.  The car is originally blue with blue interior.  Glass is all good and tinted.  (look at pictures).  Car is orginally from Arizona and it was left at my shop 20 years ago.  So therefor is was abandond and there is no title.  Motor was a 390 with a C-6 transmission but that is gone.  I have a 390 motor and a C-6 transmission of a 66 Ford wagon with will need to be rebuilt.  I will will let it go with the car if the bid gets over $2000.00.  If the bid is under $2000.00 and you want the drive line.  I will sell if it for the difference in the bid.  All the chrome parts are there for the car to be restored.  Everything shown in the pictures.  If you need a picture of a certain item let me know.  At the end of the auction a $500.00 deposit will be required through paypal.  That is non refundable.   Thanks and good luck. 

Auto Services in Missouri

Wodohodsky Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 24300 County Road 9020, Dixon
Phone: (573) 759-6250

West County Nissan ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 14747 Manchester Road, Saint-Ann
Phone: (636) 394-0330

Wayne`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9902 S Broadway, Sulphur-Springs
Phone: (314) 544-4141

Superior Collision Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1008 N Robin St, Nixa
Phone: (417) 724-0707

Superior Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Brake Repair
Address: 620 W Main St, Smithton
Phone: (660) 826-0578

Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1548 N Glenstone Ave, Branson-West
Phone: (417) 831-5960

Auto blog

We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton

Tue, Jul 14 2020

The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender.  Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys.  As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more.  On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.

J Mays retiring from Ford design, succeeded by Moray Callum

Tue, 05 Nov 2013

Ford's highly influential head of design, J Mays, has announced that he'll be retiring from his position after 33 years in the industry, 16 of which were at the Dearborn, MI-based company. Upon departure, he'll be succeeded as group vice president of design by Moray Callum. If that last name sounds familiar, yes, he's the brother of Jaguar's Ian Callum.
It's difficult to explain just how big of a role Mays had on not just Ford's design over the years, but on the entire industry. Before heading to Dearborn, Mays worked for Audi, BMW and then Volkswagen, where he was involved in concept cars that paved the way for design icons like the first-generation Audi TT and the Volkswagen New Beetle. As for his Ford resume, it's extensive.
Mays joined the company in 1997 as design director for Ford, Lincoln, Mercury and Mazda, as well as the Premier Automotive Group (Volvo, Land Rover, Jaguar and Aston Martin). He was heavily involved in the Ford Fusion, Focus, Fiesta, Taurus, F-150 and Mustang, while also contributing to concept cars like the Atlas, Evos, 427, Forty-Nine, Shelby GR-1, Lincoln MKZ and the MKC.

We test the 2016 Ford F-150 Pro Trailer Backup Assist

Thu, May 21 2015

There are some automotive tasks that are more or less impossible the first time you attempt them, no matter your skill level. Remember the first time you had to back a trailer into position? Yeah, you'd have more luck disarming a nuclear bomb than getting the trailer where you're aiming. Ford is preparing to debut a technology that takes the mystery out of reversing a trailer, with the new Pro Trailer Backup Assist. Available on the entire 2016 F-150 range, the system essentially allows owners to drive their trailers by way of a dash-mounted knob. Turn the knob and the steering wheel automagically turns to the correct angle, leading the trailer in the desired direction. The steering wheel twirls about as needed, although drivers still have direct control of the accelerator and brake pedals, much as they do with Ford's Enhanced Active Park Assist system. Ford has spent eight years developing the system, the company's engineers told us. Drivers will need to measure their trailers a certain way and fit the checked reference sticker you can see in the gallery, although once a measurement is stored in the system, it can easily be recalled using the display in the instrument cluster. The system can stow the measurements for 10 trailers, and can accommodate tow-behinds up to 33 feet long. As of right now, though, the PTBA can't work with gooseneck trailers or fifth-wheels, although we're betting Ford is hard at work to accommodate those more substantial setups. "Pro Trailer Backup Assist is a smart solution to save time and increase productivity for our customers," Doug Scott, Ford Truck's marketing manager, said in the attached statement. "Instead of struggling to back up their trailer, they can spend more time on the job or enjoying the lake." We took part in a hands-on demo of the new system off the Detroit River, near Grosse Ile, MI. Full disclosure, we didn't back the trailer into the water, (your author had no interest in potentially damaging the roughly $50,000 boat/trailer Ford brought in for the test). We did, however, conduct a brief test in the safe confines of a nearby parking lot. Our immediate impression of this technology is that it will be a boon to novices or first-time towers, a group of which your author is a member. It takes the mystery out of backing up a trailer, and while there's still a learning curve involved, it's significantly easier than doing things the old-fashioned way.