2004 Ford Ranger Xl Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 2.3l 25mpg No Reserve!!! on 2040-cars
Central, South Carolina, United States
Up for sale is this 2004 Ford Ranger XL Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door 2.3L/Automatic. I have had this truck for 1 year now and put about 10,000 miles on it, it would be a great first truck for anyone and gets amazing gas mileage at 25 miles per gallon. I have the clear title in hand and it is a South Carolina title. I bought a new F250 and selling this truck will allow me to put some goodies on it so it has to go.
It has a brand new vinyl floor from ACC (Auto Custom Carpets) and also a brand new rear window. I also painted the wheels and bumpers black. I have also added HID headlights as the factory lights were not bright at all. The only things wrong with the truck is the body is about a 6 on a 10 scale, it does have some dents and dings in the body and the driver seat has a couple tears (see pictures). Also the transmission leaks a small amount of fluid and shifts a little hard in 3rd gear but I will say I have driven it for 10,000 miles and it hasn't gotten worse. As long as you keep the correct amount of fluid in the transmission it actually shifts fine. This is a NO RESERVE auction meaning it will sell no matter what and the top bidder gets the truck!!! Happy Bidding!!! |
Ford Ranger for Sale
1992 v8 ford ranger pre-runner show truck *** everyting is new
Certified 2011 ranger supercab xlt 4.0l v6 4x4 bedliner one owner carfax video(US $21,300.00)
All electric ford ranger - drive past gas stations!(US $10,000.00)
1998 ford ranger no reserve
2003 ford ranger extended cab 3.0l v6 auto low mileage cpo warranty(US $12,900.00)
We finance 05 ranger supercab xlt 2wd cloth bench seat cd audio 4.0l v6(US $4,200.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
West Specialty Products Used Cars ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Star Automotive ★★★★★
Stack`s Wholesale Auto Parts ★★★★★
Scott`s Automotive ★★★★★
Reid`s Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford says C-Max mpg reduction has hurt sales
Tue, 22 Apr 2014The Ford C-Max is having a rough time. Sales for the five-door hybrid hatchback were down 39.1 percent in March to 2,295 cars, and sales from January through March were down 42.5 percent to 5,566 units. In an interview with The Detroit News, Ford Americas boss Joe Hinrichs places the blame on lowering the model's fuel economy rating.
"We're definitely seeing consideration on C-Max decline over time. We need to reinvest in the product because it's a great car," said Hinrichs to The Detroit News.
The company was hit with bad publicity over the C-Max when owners in multiple states filed class action lawsuits that alleged the cars weren't able to meet the stated fuel economy. Ford eventually re-rated the model from 47 miles per gallon city, highway and combined to 40 mpg city, 45 mpg highway and 43 mpg combined. To soften the blow of the change, the automaker sent checks to the owners to make up some of the difference. Initially, Ford claimed that demand remained strong for the hybrid. However, the latest sales figures and Hinrichs' statement seem to show the opposite.
Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems
Fri, 29 Mar 2013A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.
Ford recalling 126,000 Fusions and Milans over wheel separation concern
Fri, 09 Dec 2011Ford has announced a recall of certain Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles after an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. A total of 128,616 2010 and 2011 models equipped with steel wheels may have been manufactured with wheel studs that could crack and split over time. If that happens, the vehicle may experience a wheel separation.
According to The Detroit News, the company is aware of a total of 30 wheel separation incidents, one of which occurred on the front of the vehicle. Even so, no injuries have been reported as a result of the defect.
The problem apparently stems from the fact that the mounting pads on the vehicles' steel wheels may have been faulty from the factory. In addition, the wheel mounting face on rear disc brakes may not have been installed properly. Ford will inspect the rear disc face and replace them as necessary. In addition, the company will replace all of the vehicle's wheel studs free of charge. Head to the NHTSA website for more information, and click past the jump to view the full recall notice.