Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1989 Ford Ranger S Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 2.3l on 2040-cars

US $2,800.00
Year:1989 Mileage:54086 Color: Green /
 Gray
Location:

Battle Creek, Michigan, United States

Battle Creek, Michigan, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Engine:2.3L 140Cu. In. l4 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1FTCR10A1KUA50418 Year: 1989
Mileage: 54,086
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Green
Model: Ranger
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: S Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 4
Options: CD Player, Convertible
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"THIS IS A CUSTOM USED 1989 FORD RANGER PICKUP PAINT HAS A COUPLE OF SPOTS AS SEEN IN PICS INTERIOR IS CLOTH TWO SMALL HOLES"

I HAVE A ONE OF A KIND CUSTOM FORD RANGER. THIS TRUCK HAS A 4 CYL. ENGINE. IT HAS THE FIVE SPEED MANUAL. THIS TRUCK CAN BE TAKEN ANY WHERE IT RUNS AND DRIVES GOOD !! IT HAS A MUSTANG 8.8 REAREND,AND A 1978 MUSTANG 2 QUICK STEER STEERING BOX .MUSTANG RIMS. DROP SPINDLES IN FRONT,C NOTCHED FRAME IN REAR, CUSTOM GRILL,SHAVED TAILGATE,AND TAILLIGHTS IT HAD THE TOP CHOPPED AND A CONVERTIBLE TOP MADE FOR IT. THE TOP IS A HARD TOP BUT HAS DAMAGE MAY BE REPAIRABLE OR MAKE NEW ONE. NO DOOR HANDLES IT HAS NEW ELECTRIC DOOR POPPERS.THE PAINT IS IN FAIR SHAPE MAYBE HAS A COUPLE OF BAD SPOTS AS SEEN IN PICS.. THE INSIDE HAS FORD EXPLORER BUCKETS WITH LUMBAR SUPPORT. HAS A AFTERMARKET RADIO. THIS IS A VERY COOL TRUCK TO DRIVE AND GETS A LOT OF ATTENTION.  THIS TRUCK IS FOR SALE LOCALLY AND I RESERVE RIGHT TO END AUCTION EARLY IF SOLD.ALSO VEHICLE IS SOLD AS IS AND NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.  CALL MIKE @ 269-282-8102

Auto Services in Michigan

Welch Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts & Supplies-Used & Rebuilt-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 8711 Arkansaw Rd, Allen
Phone: (517) 869-2388

Wear Master ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 45449 Van Dyke Ave, Bruce
Phone: (586) 580-9011

Walsh`s Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 25639 W 7 Mile Rd, Ecorse
Phone: (313) 532-2823

Vehicle Accessories ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 2219 W Hill Rd, Grand-Blanc
Phone: (810) 232-2400

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 3509 Owen Rd, Grand-Blanc
Phone: (810) 629-1600

Town And Country Auto Service Center LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 6227 W Mount Hope Hwy, Leslie
Phone: (517) 580-0015

Auto blog

Toyota, Ford not interested in FCA merger

Mon, Jun 15 2015

Sergio Marchionne will preach the benefits of mergers to anyone who'll listen, but his calls for industry consolidation may be falling on deaf ears. At least, that is, the ears of those who the Fiat Chrysler chief would most like to bend. Not only is General Motors uninterested, but according to The Detroit News, neither are Toyota or Ford. "It's something we would not be interested in," said Toyota's North American chief Jim Lentz, at the groundbreaking ceremony for the new Toyota Technical Center. "At 10 million (vehicles) we have enough scale right now to do what we need to do. There really would be no advantage for us." Toyota isn't the only one unenthused by the prospect of merging with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. The Detroit News also reports that Ford, though it may yet to have been approached by Marchionne, wouldn't be interested either. "We're not a suitor for FCA," said Ford CFO Bob Shanks. "We don't see that type of opportunity as one that applies to us." With GM, Toyota, and Ford expressing disinterest in Marchionne's merger idea, the FCA chief will likely start looking elsewhere – or look for other ways to compel his primary candidate to reconsider. He may eventually find a partner – more likely in the Far East or within Europe – but it may not take the form of the major player Sergio has hoped for. News Source: The Detroit NewsImage Credit: Bill Pugliano/Getty Chrysler Fiat Ford Toyota Sergio Marchionne FCA merger fiat chrysler automobiles

Ford opens 88 new dealerships in China in a single day

Mon, 23 Jun 2014

"Ford opened 88 dealerships in China last year." "Ford opened 88 dealerships in China during the first half of 2014." "Ford opened 88 dealerships in China last month." None of those statements - even the last one - would seem unbelievable. Saying "Ford opened up 88 dealerships in China last Thursday," though, is a bit more dramatic.
Yes, on June 19 alone, Ford opened the doors on nearly 100 showrooms in the People's Republic, boosting the Blue Oval's total presence in the country to 750 dealerships. Of course, while an overabundance of dealers in the US proved troublesome for American manufacturers back in 2008 and 2009, there's no such concern in China. Considering the country's huge population and the breakneck pace of the local auto industry, you could be forgiven for being surprised Ford only has 750 outlets at this stage.
What's notable about this most recent push, besides the sheer volume of new stores, is their location. Over three-quarters of the new dealerships are in so-called Tier 4 cities, which are smaller towns that still contain millions of people. This fits with Ford's strategy in China of avoiding the bigger battlegrounds that are already dominated by competitors and focusing on setting up shop in newer markets that may have been overlooked, according to Automotive News.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.