1982 Mustang Gt on 2040-cars
Barboursville, West Virginia, United States
Body Type:Hatchback
Engine:302
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Mustang
Trim: GT
Drive Type: Rear
Options: Sunroof
Mileage: 75,300
Power Options: Power steering and power brakes
Sub Model: GT
Exterior Color: Silver
Warranty: No
Interior Color: Black
1982 Ford Mustang GT Silver, much like the car in the 1982 Ford Brochure for Mustang, true down to the wheels on car. Car is a three owner car, with the second owner only storing the car and no driving was done. The mileage has been verified by the first owners and appears to be correct. Tried to put car back to the spirit of the GT when they first came out, but have made some hidden changes. The four speed was replaced by a reconditioned 5 speed and the stock intake and carb were missing, these has been replaced with Edelbrock intake and carb that work very well. The engine was removed to clean the engine compartment and check for wear and had new gaskets installed and replaced. New clutch and pressure plate as also installed when everything was put back. Car is a low option car, and there was a sunroof installed by the dealer when purchased. The build sheet was found and will be included with car. Car was in good shape, but drivers door was replaced due to some corrision on bottom and did not want to use. Car was repainted and looks good, but it is not a concours paint job, but could be buffed out. There is also a good set of TRX wheels to go with the car, but the tires are not good for driving.
List of items replaced or added"
5 speed.
Edelbrock intake and new carb, short headers and H pipe with Flowmaster mufflers.
New water pump, raditor, plugs, plug wires and belt. Also a air pump eliminator pulley installed.
New carpet and weahter stripping along with a new headliner, interior looks very good.
New shift knob, and hard to find hood emblem, and new windshield, rest or glass in original to car.
New brakes and wheel cylinders, new brake lines where needed.
Subframe connectors.
New tires
Ford Mustang for Sale
83' mustang glx 5.0 4sd (trunk) original stock original owner no reserve!!
V8, power disk brakes, power steering, 9 in. rear end.
Gt premium coupe aftermarket wide chrome wheels dual power seats shaker sound
1994 ford mustang
1990 fox body mustang, 5.0 high output, k & n air filter, fox racing plug wires
Mustang gt(US $6,200.00)
Auto Services in West Virginia
Steve`s Auto Parts ★★★★★
R & M Auto ★★★★★
National Muffler Svc ★★★★★
Hurricane Auto Repair ★★★★★
Hometown Subaru Kia ★★★★★
Bill And Glenns Tire And Auto ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford will keep Escape and MKC plant open an extra week to meet demand
Thu, Jun 8 2017Crossovers keep selling like popular pastries, and for Ford, that means it needs to keep production going. The company announced that, rather than the usual two-week shutdown, its Louisville, Ky., assembly plant will be open for one of those weeks. The plant builds the Ford Escape and Lincoln MKC, which Ford reports have had record sales. According to Ford, Escape sales through May are up 3 percent, and MKC sales are up 10 percent compared with last year. In total, the Escape has sold about 130,000 units through May, and the MKC has sold around 11,000. Keeping the Louisville plant open will allow the company to build an additional 8,500 vehicles. Ford stated that all other assembly plants will continue with the two-week shutdown as scheduled. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford Escape: First Drive View 24 Photos Image Credit: Drew Phillips Plants/Manufacturing Ford Lincoln Crossover SUV Economy Cars Luxury lincoln mkc
Ford issues recalls for Fiesta, Fusion, E-Series, and Lincoln MKZ
Wed, Mar 25 2020Ford has issued two new safety recalls for North America. The first covers certain 2014-15 Ford Fiestas, 2014-16 Ford Fusions, and 2014-16 Lincoln MKZs with doors that might not close properly. The second pertains to 2021 Ford E-Series stripped chassis and cutaway vehicles with a wiring harness that might chaffe and expose important wiring. Ford is recalling 268,343 Fiesta hatchbacks, Fusion sedans, and MKZ sedans across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, with 248,912 of the affected vehicles located in the U.S. The recall says the "latch pawl spring-tab design" could crack in locations where the temperature gets too hot. If the tab breaks, the door might not shut. Or, worse, the door will shut temporarily and reopen once the vehicle is in motion. As a fix, Ford dealers will remove and replace the side door latches. In a separate recall, Ford is targeting 3,631 2021 E-Series stripped chassis and cutaway vehicles. These vehicles could have frame-mounted wiring harnesses that could deteriorate and break due to rubbing on the frame. If the chaffing wears down the harness, wiring for the fuel, trailer tow, and antilock braking systems could be exposed and damaged. In the worst-case scenario, the damage to the fuel pump wiring could cause the pump to stop working, which could stall the vehicle. Those with affected E-Series vehicles should bring them in to dealerships for inspection. If there is no damage, technicians will add anti-abrasion tape over the area and "ensure clearance to surrounding components." If the harness is damaged, the wiring will be spliced and fixed, then anti-abrasion tape will be added. Ford also issued a third recall, but it is specifically for the Canadian market. On 54,292 examples of 2006-10 Ford Fusions, 2006-10 Mercury Milans, and 2006-10 Lincoln MKZs, a valve inside the hydraulic control unit might stick open. According to Ford, this could result in a longer brake pedal travel, which could possibly create dangerous situations if the driver is unaware. Dealerships will inspect the control units and replace those that are defective. Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport Leaks!!
2020 Toyota Highlander vs other 3-row crossovers: There can only be one!
Fri, Dec 20 2019We've done quite a few spec comparison posts involving three-row family crossovers, and when included, the Toyota Highlander has always been the runt of the group. While the rest increasingly seemed to be benchmarking each other toward greater girth, the Highlander was the outlier. That changes a bit for the 2020 Toyota Highlander, but only a bit. It's now larger and more competitive, specifically in regards to the amount of cargo space aft of the third-row seat. As you can see below, this aligns the Highlander most closely to its long-time competitor the 2020 Honda Pilot. However, let's see how it stacks up to others in the segment, which is heavily populated now, so for the sake of space, we've selected the newest entries: Kia Telluride, Hyundai Palisade, Subaru Ascent and Ford Explorer. The order in which they are presented is random. Performance and fuel economy The 2020 Highlander is more than 200 pounds lighter than its predecessor, but has the same 295-horsepower V6 engine that was already one of the strongest in the segment. We'd say that would give it a leg up, but the Pilot and Explorer have proven to be sprinters, delivering 0-60 times in the low-6 range by some publications' stopwatches (or VBoxes, whatever). We don't expect the Highlander to beat them, but it may dip into the 6's. The heavy, less-powerful Subaru Ascent is most likely to take up the rear. It's fuel economy of 23 mpg combined also matches the Highlander and Explorer for segment-best. Remember, however, that the Explorer's turbocharged inline-four engine is likely more susceptible to differences in driving style (read: a heavy foot). Of course, if you're really interested in fuel economy, the Highlander and Explorer are the only vehicles in the segment to offer hybrid versions. The Ford Explorer Hybrid puts a greater emphasis on performance, however, resulting in lower estimates of 25 mpg combined (AWD) and 28 mpg combined (FWD). By contrast, the new 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid is estimated to return 36 mpg combined. Passenger and cargo space According to Highlander chief engineer Yoshikazu Saeki, he had a choice of two directions with the new Highlander. He could have indeed made it bigger, matching these very competitors, especially in terms of third-row and cargo space. Or, he could have maintained a smaller-than-average size. He obviously chose the latter. First, it was the size customers had come to expect. Would they be put off by something bigger?









