Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Ford Fairlane Unrestored 66 Gt 390 4speed #'s Matching Rust Free on 2040-cars

US $19,338.00
Year:1966 Mileage:82000 Color: Tan /
 Red
Location:

Round O, South Carolina, United States

Round O, South Carolina, United States
Advertising:

1966 Fairlane GT
#'s Matching S-code 390 4v, 4-speed
Wimbledon White w/ Red Deluxe interior

This is a very original 1966 Fairlane GT. This car is unrestored and original with the exception of one exterior
repaint. This is a high quality, rust free, correct, and numbers matching 1966 Fairlane GT. This car is a blast
to drive, but the best thing about this car is it retains all of its hard to find parts! This car has been
meticulously maintained and cared for, for the last 53 years. The paint finish is beautiful and shines excellent.
The original sheetmetal is strong and is rust free. The original red GT deluxe interior is impeccable and really
sets this car apart. The engine runs strong but is very smooth and easy to drive. The factory 4-speed is also
correct and shifts like new. The factory 3.25 rear gear is perfect to hit the open road and enjoy this car. If
you are in the market for a factory 4-speed 390 GT Fairlane, this car is hard to beat!
6- 1966
A- Assembly Plant Atlanta, GA
40- 2-door Hardtop GT Fairlane
S- 390 cubic inch V8 4-V 335 HP
63D- 2 door Fairlane GT Hardtop
M- Wimbledon White
85- Red Interior
24G- Date July 24 1966
24- Atlanta DSO
4- 3:25 Axle Ratio
5- 4-Speed Manual Transmission

Auto Services in South Carolina

Wilson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 301 S Congress St, Lebanon
Phone: (800) 551-1767

Usa Tire & Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 100 Fort Mill Sq, York
Phone: (803) 548-2055

Tire Town South ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 3414 Macklen Rd, Bucksport
Phone: (843) 293-4949

Tire Kingdom ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Wheels
Address: 5352 South Blvd, Tega-Cay
Phone: (704) 521-9002

Steve White Volkswagen Audi ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 100 Duvall Dr, Reidville
Phone: (864) 288-8300

St. Andrews Express Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 4653 Broad River Rd, Cayce
Phone: (803) 772-5916

Auto blog

Toyota tops Kelley Blue Book's Resale Value Awards

Tue, 27 Nov 2012

Kelley Blue Book announced its annual Best Resale Value Award winners, and we weren't too surprised to see the list dominated by Japanese automakers - mainly Toyota and Honda. KBB hands out the awards based on the projected residual value of mostly all 2013 model year vehicles, and Toyota skated home with a number of awards including 10 of the 22 overall categories and having five of its products in the top 10 for models with best resale value. KBB's Best Resale Value Awards were announced in the same week as the ALG Residual Value Awards, and there were many similarities between both lists, especially when it came to Toyota.
To come up with its winners, KBB measures depreciation over the first five years of ownership, and looks for the cars it expects to hold its value the best after this time; on average, the report says the 2013 model year vehicles will lose 61.8 percent of its value in five years. Of the 22 categories, 15 slots were filled by Toyota, Honda and Nissan products, while the Camaro and Porsche (Cayenne and Panamera) each took home a pair of awards. If Toyota has anything to be upset about in this list of cars, it's that categories for Hybrid/Alternative Energy Car and Electric Vehicle went to the Ford Fusion and Chevrolet Volt, respectively.
The overall top 10 models for the best resale value in 2013 are, in alphabetical order:

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

NHTSA probes 2014 Ford Edge Sport 22-inch alloy wheels

Wed, May 27 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into the 2014 Ford Edge Sport for the possibility its 22-inch wheels could break while on the road. This affects an estimated 20,000 examples of the crossover, according to NHTSA. The case that instigated this evaluation was submitted to NHTSA in November 2014. The driver reported that the front, right corner of the vehicle suddenly dipped, and the Edge went into a field. No one was harmed, but upon investigation, the wheel had broken into two pieces, according to The Detroit News. When this happened, this crossover had been driven an estimated 8,500 miles. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations are meant "to assess the scope, frequency, and safety-related consequences of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles." If a problem is discovered during the investigation, this process can lead to a recall. Ford spokesperson Kelli Felker told Autoblog, "We will cooperate with NHTSA on this investigation, as we always do." INVESTIGATION Subject : Wheel Separation Date Investigation Opened: MAY 20, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15020 Component(s): WHEELS All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD EDGE 2014 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: On November 29, 2014, ODI received a complaint (ODI No. 10661278) reporting the sudden failure of an original equipment 22-inch alloy wheel rim that failed on a model year 2014 Ford Edge. The right-front corner of the vehicle suddenly dropped while driving, causing the vehicle to drive off the road and into a field. The right-front wheel rim was found to have broken into two pieces. The owner said that there was no prior warning or wheel related problems with the vehicle. The vehicle had been driven approximately 8,500 miles at the time of the incident. A preliminary evaluation has been opened to assess the scope, frequency and safety-related consequences of the alleged defect in the subject vehicles. Related Video: