Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Ford F250 Crew Cab Mechanic Special, Needs Engine, No Reserve!!! on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:134000 Color: Blue /
 Gray
Location:

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:5.8 LITER GASOLINE
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 1FTSW20585EB42119 Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: F-250
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Trim: XLT
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: REAR WHEEL DRIVE
Options: CD Player
Mileage: 134,000
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Sub Model: CREW CAB, PROJECT, XLT
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

MID-AMERICA MOTORS

2401 FAIRFIELD

LINCOLN NEBRASKA,68521

OFFICE/FAX 402-477-4426

ROD'S CELL 402-560-0766

UP FOR AUCTION IS A NEW CAR TRADE.

2005 FORD F250 CREW CAB SHORT BOX

GAS 5.8 LITER ENGINE THAT IS BAD!!!!!!

NEEDS TIRES AND A FRONT WIND SHIELD.

DRIVES SIDE SEAT WORN SEE PICTURES

HAS DAMAGE ON BOTH BOX SIDES SEE PICTURES

THIS TRUCK WOULD PART FOR $7000.00 PLUS

HAVE CLEAR TITLE

BRING TRAILER AND WE WILL HELP YOU LOAD IT

SELLING TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER!!!!!!!!!!!


 THANKS FOR LOOKING AND HAVE A GREAT DAY!

Auto Services in Nebraska

Searl Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 2515 N 85th St, Waterloo
Phone: (402) 393-2532

Napa Auto Parts - Utility Parts Service - North ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Engines-Supplies, Equipment & Parts, Truck Equipment & Parts
Address: 3630 Cornhusker Hwy, Martell
Phone: (402) 466-8515

Miracle Workers Auto Collision Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 2001 S 1st St, Denton
Phone: (402) 474-7355

Kustom Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Customizing
Address: 2125 W O St, Pleasant-Dale
Phone: (402) 477-4002

GP Mobile Car Wash ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Washing & Cleaning, Automobile Detailing
Address: Union
Phone: (402) 601-6929

Risky Business ★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 402 E St, Peru
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

Consumer Reports declares most and least loved cars [w/video]

Wed, Dec 3 2014

Consumer Reports is crunching the numbers from its annual owner-satisfaction survey, and part of that process is finding out how attached drivers are to their cars. CR simply asks readers of models up to three years old if they would buy the same vehicle again in light of their entire ownership experience, and tallies the results. After looking at the responses for about 350,000 vehicles, it turns out that people really love a certain California-built, electrically powered luxury sedan. That's right, this year's the overall winner was the Tesla Model S with a whopping 98 percent of owners saying they would purchase another one (the Model S also won this award last year, with 99 percent satisfaction). The Chevrolet Corvette Stingray came in a close second with 95 percent of drivers hoping to park another one in their garage. A few models weren't quite so favored, though. The Nissan Versa Sedan was the least loved model among its owners; a mere 42 percent said that they would purchase another. The aging Jeep Compass didn't do much better, with just 43 percent of drivers willing to buy the softroader again. On average, about 70 percent of owners say they would buy their car again, and only four cars ranked below 50 percent in CR's findings. Check out the video above to see some of the winners and losers in a few of CR's categories. If you're a subscriber, you can check out the full list on its website. Related Gallery Consumer Reports Most Loved Cars 2014 Related Gallery Consumer Reports Least Loved Cars 2014 News Source: Consumer Reports - sub. req., Consumer Reports via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Mazda Mercedes-Benz Porsche Subaru Tesla Ownership Videos car ownership

2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5, Ram 1500 TRX and Toyota goes in on EVs | Autoblog Podcast #710

Thu, Dec 23 2021

This episode of the Autoblog Podcast features Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore and Senior Editor, Green, John Beltz Snyder. John is beck from a recent first drive of the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5, and has a 2022 Ford Bronco 4-Door Black Diamond in his driveway. Meanwhile, Greg just got out of a 2022 Ram 1500 TRX and back into Autoblog's long-term Acura TLX. After talking about the car's they've been driving, they dive into the news, including EV announcements from Toyota and Lexus, rumors of a turbo I6 Dodge Challenger, a list of future classics from Hagerty and a review of the sitcom American Auto. Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: Podcast@Autoblog.com. Enjoy your holidays, and we'll see you in 2022. Autoblog Podcast #710 Get The Podcast Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown What we're driving: 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 2022 Ram 1500 TRX 2021 Acura TLX 2022 Ford Bronco Black Diamond News: Toyota and Lexus preview future EVs Dodge Challenger could get a downsized turbo straight-six Hagerty's list of future classic cars to buy before values take off NBC's American Auto fires on most cylinders Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on Apple Podcasts Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or "Alexa, open Autoblog" to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives. Related Video:

Ford fights back against patent trolls

Fri, Feb 13 2015

Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.