Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Ford F250 Super Duty on 2040-cars

US $10,900.00
Year:2000 Mileage:319997 Color: Gold /
 Tan
Location:

325 W 2nd St, Rushville, Indiana, United States

325 W 2nd St, Rushville, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Diesel
Engine:7.3L V8 16V DDI OHV Turbo Diesel
Transmission:Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTNW21F8YED04372
Stock Num: 13T255
Make: Ford
Model: F250 Super Duty
Year: 2000
Exterior Color: Gold
Interior Color: Tan
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Diameter of tires: 16.0"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.4"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.4"
  • Front Leg Room: 40.7"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Gross vehicle weight: 8,800 lbs.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf front spring
  • Leaf front suspension
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Manual locking hubs
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Overall height: 80.8"
  • Overall Width: 80.0"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power steering
  • Rear bench
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 41.0"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 42.5"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Profile: 85
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 235 mm
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 7
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 319997

2000 Ford F250 Superduty XLT Crew Cab 4x4, 7.3L POWER STROKE DIESEL AUTOMATIC, Pwr.Window/Lock, Tilt/Cruise, A/C, CD, Tow, Alloys, Keyless, Bed Liner, Pwr.Seat, 319,997 Miles $10,900

Auto Services in Indiana

Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 127 S Detroit Ave, Portland
Phone: (866) 943-9403

Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 127 S Detroit Ave, Saratoga
Phone: (866) 943-9403

Webb Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 9236 Indianapolis Blvd, Highland
Phone: (219) 923-2277

Trusty & Sons Tire Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1074 Old Forest Rd NW, Corydon
Phone: (812) 738-4212

Tom Roush Lincoln Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 525 David Brown Dr, Westfield
Phone: (866) 869-7884

Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 9821 Lima Rd, Fort-Wayne
Phone: (260) 490-8473

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Again? Ford issues second 2015 Fusion and Lincoln MKZ seat belt recall

Fri, Aug 16 2019

In 2016, Ford issued a recall for 603,392 2013-2016 Fusions and 2013-2015 Lincoln MKZs due to potentially faulty seat belts. Apparently, that wasn't the end of it. Ford announced another recall this week for the same issue, this time covering 108,399 2015 Fusions and MKZs.  In both cases, the seat belt anchor pretensioners are the issue. According to Ford, "increased temperatures generated during deployment of the driver or front-passenger seat belt anchor pretensioner could degrade the tensile strength of the cable below the level needed to restrain an occupant." Basically, heat could weaken the seat belts, and in extreme cases, they wouldn't be able to keep up proper safety standards. Ford knows of at least one injury that has occurred due to this issue.   The recall includes 103,374 vehicles in the United States, 4,002 in Canada, and 1,023 in Mexico. Possibly affected Fusions were built at Ford's Flat Rock Assembly Plant between August 1, 2014 and January 30, 2015. The MKZs were built at the Hermosillo Assembly Plant between August 1, 2014 and November 21, 2014.  As a fix, Ford says dealers will add an extra coating to the seat belt pretensioner cable for protection from the heat. If this recall might affect your vehicle, call your local Ford dealership and use recall reference No. 19S25. This news comes after Ford recalled 1.3 million Fusions and MKZs in 2018 due to the possibility that the steering wheels could fall off. Fusions have also been recalled due to the risk of rolling away.

Long winter means most automakers won't curb summer shutdown

Sun, 18 May 2014

A lot more happened during this latest brutal winter than days of snow and Netflix binges. Automotive sales took a battering. After all, going out car shopping when it's eleventy-billion degrees below zero isn't a good time.
Because of this Old Man Winter-induced sales slump, inventories are abnormally high as we head into the summer car buying season. That's led some analysts to predict that automakers will be more inclined to idle factories this summer, in a bid to trim some of the built-up inventory. Traditionally, American manufacturers offer up a two-week break in the middle of summer, although the burgeoning sales of the past few years have seen this practice become less popular.
"We're likely not going to see an acceleration this year," Jeff Schuster, a senior vice president at LMC Automotive, told The Detroit News. "We'll see production increases in 'pockets' but I don't know if it will be as widespread as in recent years."