Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1992 Ford F-150 Truck Pick Up, Fiberglass Topper,and Re Built Motor, 2wd on 2040-cars

Year:1992 Mileage:215000 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

Richmond, Minnesota, United States

Richmond, Minnesota, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:5.0L 302Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
VIN: 1FTDF15N3NLA87974 Year: 1992
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: F-150
Trim: Custom Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 215,000
Exterior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Original owner truck that has 215,000 miles and has rebuilt motor with less than 20,000 miles. Needs tires and has a couple rust spots repaired. Been sitting for a bit and needs a good cleaning. Dual tanks but 2nd tank does not work. Owner thinks it might be electrical but not sure. Truck runs and drives nice. Appears to be in decent shape with no known problems. Lots of miles left. Transmission and rear seem to be fine. Couple minor rips in seats that are expected for a truck this age. This truck belongs to my Father and he just doesn't drive anymore as he has another truck. Call or email any questions"

Original Owner truck that currently has 215,000 miles and has less than 20,000 miles on re built motor. It is 2 wd  truck with  an automatic transmission that runs  and drives nice but could use new tires. There are spots on the truck where some rust holes were repaired. The transmission and other components all appear to be fine This is my 84 year old Fathers truck so I,m trying to give the best description I can . This truck has always been well maintained . Don't know what else to say but this is a very decent truck that has lots of milage left on it Any questions can be forwarded to him. He does take calls and anybody is welcome to come drive it and look at it. Good luck and happy bidding.

Auto Services in Minnesota

Zimmerman Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Racing & Sports Cars
Address: 26069 2nd St W, Burns-Township
Phone: (763) 856-5949

South Central Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 510 17th St N, Courtland
Phone: (507) 354-3540

Sleepy Eye Auto Salvage ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 20917 State Highway 4, Sleepy-Eye
Phone: (507) 794-6673

Sears Auto Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube, Tire Dealers
Address: 425 Rice St, Vadnais-Heights
Phone: (651) 291-4327

Saigon Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3028 E Lake St, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (612) 721-7087

Rose Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1695 Fernwood St, Saint-Anthony
Phone: (651) 383-4532

Auto blog

2015 Ford F-150 [w/videos]

Thu, 02 Oct 2014

To learn more about the all-new 2015 F-150 and get an early read on its potential hero-or-zero status, we flew to the heart of full-size pickup truck country, San Antonio, TX, to spend a day driving, towing and playing in the mud with an assortment of Ford's innovative new trucks.
First, a caveat - while we feel we have a reasonably good handle on the new F-150 after attending this first-drive event, we are far from ready to pass definitive judgment on the success of this radically new rig. Our time in the various models was lamentably limited and we felt rushed. With so much at stake and with so much to talk about and experience, we had zero alone time with the vehicle - there were Ford folks shadowing us at every moment.
And we still don't know everything there is to know about the trucks, as Ford is withholding some of its most crucial numbers, including curb weight data and anticipated EPA fuel economy figures. We don't even have a firm on-sale date. All of this information is typically disclosed - or at least officially estimated - at the time of a new vehicle's first drive. This limits the scope of the judgments we feel comfortable making based on our first encounter.

Daimler consulting with Ford about 3-cylinder engines

Mon, 27 May 2013

Soon enough, Ford will offer its 1.0-liter EcoBoost three-cylinder engine under the hood of the Fiesta here in the United States, building on the success of the small powerplant overseas. In fact, this success has caused other automakers to take notice, and according to Automotive News Europe, Daimler is now talking to Ford about this engine for use in its own products.
In other markets, Ford offers the 1.0-liter mill under the hood of the Focus (we had the chance to sample this package on our home turf), as well as the B-Max MPV. For this new collaboration, Daimler would use the turbo-three in the next-generation Smart ForTwo, as well as the Renault Twingo, which the German automaker will be collaborating on as part of its alliance with Renault-Nissan. Speaking to AN, a Mercedes-Benz engineer called the 1.0-liter mill an "interesting and impressive engine."
In exchange for details about the EcoBoost inline-three, Daimler will supply Ford with information regarding its Euro6 stratified lean-burn gasoline engine, which is found in the new E-Class sedan.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.