Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Ford Explorer Xlt 4d Utility 4wd 5-speed Manual Transmission on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:105300 Color: Red /
 Gray cloth
Location:

Nashua, New Hampshire, United States

Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
1999 Ford Explorer XLT 4D UTILITY 4WD 5-speed Manual Transmission, image 1
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.0L 245Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
VIN: 1fmzu34x6xua68449 Year: 1999
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Explorer
Trim: XLT Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 105,300
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray cloth
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Strong running 1999 Ford Explorer XLT 4.0 with rare 5-speed and ONLY 105K miles on it!  Brand new clutch, ready for another 105K miles.  Good luck.PayPal only, payment in full prior to delivery.  Buyer pays for and arranges for shipping or Delivery, Car sold AS IS, all sales final.

Auto Services in New Hampshire

TruckLogic.com Accessories for Pickups and SUVs - Shop Online ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Equipment & Parts, Camping Equipment
Address: Union
Phone: (303) 698-9800

RK Auto Repair, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: Union
Phone: (603) 595-7575

Rich Gagne`s Repairs Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 97 Deer Meadow Rd, Northfield
Phone: (603) 753-9567

Ray`s Auto Body & Frame ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 172 Dover Rd, Epsom
Phone: (603) 798-4525

Paul Demers Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1015 Lakeview Ave., Salem
Phone: (978) 957-6122

J & R Glass Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windows
Address: 860 Water St, Greenville
Phone: (978) 345-0177

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Four Wheeler crowns Ultimate Factory 4x4... who wins?

Thu, 15 Nov 2012

Nearly every automaker doing business in the SUV or pickup truck segments offers a package designed to improve the off-road capabilities of its wares. But, of course, not all such factory kits are created equal. How, then, to separate the wheat from the chaff? Gather each of them up and put them through their paces, naturally.
The folks from Four Wheeler and PickupTrucks.com joined forces to run just such a comparison test, with the winner named the Ultimate Factory 4x4. A total of seven vehicles showed up to the fight: the 2012 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor, 2013 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, 2012 Nissan Frontier PRO-4X and Xterra PRO-4X, 2012 Ram Power Wagon, and 2012 Toyota 4Runner Trail and Tacoma TRD T|X Baja Series.
With the contestants in place, the whole crew put each vehicle through a battery of tests that included skidpad and acceleration measurements, a hillclimb, a rocky stairstep course and a rock garden. Considering the nature of the beasts, on-road ride and comfort were not part of the routine.

Preserving automotive history costs big bucks

Wed, 29 Jan 2014



$1.8 million is spent each year to maintain GM's fleet of 600 production and concept cars.
When at least two of the Detroit Three were on the verge of death a few years back, one of the tough questions that was asked of Ford, General Motors and Chrysler execs - outside of why execs were still taking private planes to meetings - was why each company maintained huge archives of old production and concept vehicles. GM, for example, had an 1,100-vehicle collection when talk of a federal bailout began.