Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Base Sport Utility 4-door 4.0l on 2040-cars

US $5,000.00
Year:2001 Mileage:231000
Location:

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Advertising:

231,000 miles. One lifetime owner, runs well, no mechanical issues, some minor cosmetic damage (dents, scratches that can be buffed out) on the driver's side and front bumper. Truck was used as a day to day vehicle driving to and from school/work. 

Auto Services in Georgia

World Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 3310 Laventure Dr, Atlanta
Phone: (770) 457-3391

Watson/Boyd Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2900 E 46th St, Chickamauga
Phone: (423) 355-2958

Trantham`s Service Center & Wrecker Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 6733 Ringgold Rd, Fort-Oglethorpe
Phone: (423) 702-4859

Thomson Automotive Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 223 Black St, Norwood
Phone: (706) 595-3477

Suwanee Park Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 3963 Lawrenceville Suwanee Rd, Suwanee
Phone: (770) 932-1599

Summit Racing Equipment ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 20 King Mill Rd, Avondale-Est
Phone: (770) 288-3200

Auto blog

Ford Mustang Mach 1 Spied, Audi debuted the 2017 TT RS in Beijing | Autoblog Minute

Sat, Apr 30 2016

A quick recap of some of the weeks hottest stories. Eddie Sabatini reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute Weekly Recap. Audi Ford Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video mach 1 ford mustang mach 1

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Detroit automakers keep their masks on to keep the factories running

Tue, Oct 27 2020

United Auto Workers members leave the Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Warren Truck Plant in May. Fiat Chrysler along with rivals Ford and General Motors Co., restarted the assembly lines after several weeks of coronavirus lockdown. (AP)   DETROIT — When the coronavirus pandemic slammed the United States in March, the Detroit Three automakers shut their plants and brought their North American vehicle production to an unprecedented cold stop. Now, four months after a slow and sometimes bumpy restart in May, many General Motors, Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles  factories are working at close to full speed, chasing a stronger-than-expected recovery in sales. So far, none of the Detroit Three has had a major COVID-19 outbreak since restarting production, even as the coronavirus is surging in Midwestern and Southern communities outside factory walls. "We have people testing positive, but it's not affecting operations," said Ford global manufacturing chief Gary Johnson. Keeping the pandemic at bay has pushed the automakers and 156,000 U.S. factory employees represented by the United Auto Workers into unfamiliar work routines and extraordinary levels of cooperation among the rival automakers that will have to be sustained for months to come. For automakers, the automakers' COVID response has been as much about instilling new habits as relying on new technology. Workers log their symptoms, or lack of them, into smartphone apps and walk past temperature scanners to get to their work stations. But company and union executives said masks, along with physical distancing, are the key to keeping assembly lines rolling. "The mask is the foundation" of protecting workers on the job, said Johnson. Complaints about masks Autoworkers are accustomed to wearing protective gear such as shatterproof glasses and gloves. Masks that cover the mouth and nose, however, were not standard equipment on auto assembly lines, and were a tough sell at first. "The biggest complaint is wearing a mask," United Auto Workers President Rory Gamble told Reuters. "A lot of our members perform physical tasks. Wearing the mask inhibits breathing." Beyond that, Gamble said, masks and distancing make it harder for workers to have conversations on the job or socialize during breaks. "ThatÂ’s pretty much out the window, and it makes for a longer day," he said. Masks make it harder for co-workers to read each other's expressions — often crucial in the noisy environment of a car plant.