2002 Ford Excursion 7.3l Limited 2wd Deisel Leather Clean Low Miles ! ! ! ! ! ! on 2040-cars
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:DIESEL
Year: 2002
Vehicle Inspection: Vehicle has been Inspected
Make: Ford
CapType:
Model: Excursion
FuelType: Diesel
Trim: Limited Sport Utility 4-Door
Listing Type: Pre-Owned
Certification: None
Drive Type: RWD
VIN: 1FMNU42F62ED08102
Mileage: 104,904
BodyType: SUV
Sub Model: WB 7.3L
Cylinders: 8 - Cyl.
Exterior Color: Brown
DriveTrain: REAR WHEEL DRIVE
Warranty: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford Excursion for Sale
- 2000 ford excursion 7.3 diesel 4x4, garage kept, 1 owner, 116k
- 2000 ford excursion xlt sport utility 4-door 5.4l / runs and drives great(US $5,500.00)
- 2003 ford excursion eddie bauer sport utility 4-door 6.8l(US $5,900.00)
- 2000 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 7.3l
- 2002 ford excursion limited(US $19,500.00)
- 2001 ford excursion xlt sport utility 4-door 6.8l(US $12,900.00)
Auto Services in Florida
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
World Of Auto Tinting Inc ★★★★★
Wilson Bimmer Repair ★★★★★
Willy`s Paint And Body Shop Of Miami Inc ★★★★★
William Wade Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wheel Innovations & Wheel Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 has a bit of a dyno issue
Tue, 28 May 2013We're of the mind that each and every dyno should come with Murphy's Law painted in big, visible letters down the side. For every ten successful dyno runs out there, it seems there's one where events to horribly wrong. Take, for example, the video below. The clip shows what happens when a Ford Shelby GT500 and a mobile dyno have a bit of a disagreement at the Performance Expo 24 in Sherbrooke, Quebec. We won't spoil the results for you, but we will say there's some substantial carnage involved.
It's unclear just how much damage ensues from the dust up or whether anyone was harmed in the incident, but from the looks of things, everyone made it out without serious injury. If only we could say the same for the machines involved. Check out the video below.
Ford debuts Fusion NASCAR racer that edges closer to stock [w/video]
Wed, 20 Feb 2013The sixth-generation NASCAR Sprint Cup racecar, which will make its competition debut at the 2013 Daytona 500 this weekend, marks the closest thing to a "stock car" that the sport has seen in more than 20 years. No longer using just stickers to distinguish the different brands, the image above shows the lengths NASCAR and automakers went in order to create a racecar design that more closely resembles the individual cars they represent.
Ford, one of the more open and vocal OEMs regarding the Gen6 car's development, is giving us a closer look at its racing version of the Fusion with a pretty revealing side-by-side comparison with last years' racer (click above for an expanded view). Aside from the more realistic front end and production-like body lines, the overall shape, dimensions and proportions have also been designed to give the racecar a more stock appearance. Most of the new racer was designed by the Ford Design Center, which the automaker says was the first time it has been so involved in the design process since the 1960s. Of course, one area the Sprint Cup Fusion really differs from the production Fusion is its Ford Racing 5.8-liter V8 producing around 850 hp. Can you say Fusion SVT?
Scroll down for a quick video from Ford Racing showing a production Fusion morph into a Cup car.
Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems
Fri, 29 Mar 2013A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.024 s, 7238 u