Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Escape, 2.0 L Ecoboost, Sel, Leather, Fully Loaded With Options on 2040-cars

US $26,500.00
Year:2013 Mileage:8919 Color: Charcoal black leather Interior
Location:

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Tucson, Arizona, United States
Advertising:

2013 Escape SEL, 2.0 L w/ Ecoboost, Frosted Glass Metallic Paint, Leather Interior with only 8,919 miles. This Car is absolutely like new with a full 2-years left of the standard Ford Bumper to Bumper warranty, 5-year 60,000 Power Train and Roadside Assistance. Car has almost all options Ford offered on the Escape. We purchased this car a year ago and today's price is almost $8,000 below our out-the-door cost when new. There is no Sales Tax or other add-on costs. You can see more complete information and photos at: http://2013escapeforsale.homestead.com. Other Features include:

231-Hp 2.0L I-4 engine w/6-speed automatic transmission

  • Factory warranty remaining (3years/36,000miles-
  • Expires December 23, 2015 or 36,000 miles)
  • 6-year Drivetrain Warranty
  • Beautiful Frosted Glass Metallic exterior
  • Charcoal black leather Interior
  • Heated Front Seats
  • Wireless Phone Connectivity
  • Garage Door Openers
  • Front dual-zone air conditioning
  • Cruise control w/steering wheel controls
  • Sirius/Am/Fm/CD/Mp3 premium Sony stereo
  • 9 speakers
  • Mounted steering wheel audio controls
  • Power driver seat
  • Driver seat memory setting
  • Power windows
  • Power door locks
  • Power side-view mirrors 
  • Front fog lights
  • Factory-tinted windows
  • Four-wheel ABS brakes
  • Brake assist
  • ABS and driveline traction control
  • Stability control w/anti-roll control
  • Alloy wheels  
  • Remote Start
  • Heated Mirrors and Seats
  • 10-way Power Driver's Seat
  • Power Lift Gate
  • Halogen Headlamps
  • Push Button Start
  • Parking Sensors
  • Roof Rack w/Crossbars
  • Ambient Lighting and Illuminated Entry
  • And Much More
  •  

    Auto Services in Arizona

    V I Auto Repair ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
    Address: 701 W Bethany Home Rd, Glendale-Luke-Afb
    Phone: (602) 841-4394

    TIC Automotive ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Air Conditioning Service & Repair, Emission Repair-Automobile & Truck
    Address: 5310 E Northgate Loop Suite D, Flagstaff
    Phone: (928) 526-0966

    Suiter`s Automotive ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
    Address: 11049 N 23rd Ave Ste B1, Glendale-Luke-Afb
    Phone: (602) 943-6225

    Sav-On Transmission ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
    Address: 3701 N 43rd Ave, Luke-Afb
    Phone: (602) 272-1605

    Ronnie`s Auto Service ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service
    Address: 527 W University Dr, Guadalupe
    Phone: (480) 967-8869

    Red`s Collision Service ★★★★★

    Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
    Address: 22039 N 24th Ave, Youngtown
    Phone: (623) 869-0813

    Auto blog

    2016 Green Truck of the Year, Commercial Green Car of the Year finalists

    Sat, Oct 24 2015

    Not only are commercial-grade haulers getting more green love lately, they're getting more different kinds of green love. The 2016 Green Truck of the Year, the second time the award has been handed out, is being decided by judges from Green Car Journal and the San Antonio Auto & Truck Show. This year the award is joined by the new 2016 Commercial Green Car of the Year, which crowns one of the little vans increasingly used by small business as cargo and delivery vehicles. The Green Truck of the Year finalists are the Chevrolet Colorado Duramax (pictured), Ford F-150, GMC Canyon Duramax, Nissan Titan XD, and Toyota Tacoma. The first three of those were on last year's list, but since they are completely new or upgraded for 2016 - Ford with its all-aluminum body, the General Motors twins with the new diesel Duramax engine - they qualify for entry again. The Ram 1500 EcoDiesel won last year. The Commercial Green Car finalists are the Chevrolet City Express, Ford Transit Connect, Mercedes-Benz Metris, Nissan NV200, and Ram ProMaster City. You can read more details in the presser below, and the awards will be announced in San Antonio sometime during the show from November 19-22. San Antonio Auto & Truck Show Announces 2016 Green Truck of the Year and Commercial Green Car of the Year Finalists SAN ANTONIO, Oct. 22, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Green Car Journal and the San Antonio Auto & Truck Show have announced finalists for the 2016 Green Truck of the Year™ and 2016 Commercial Green Car of the Year™ awards. The Green Truck of the Year™ nominees are the Chevrolet Colorado Duramax, Ford F-150, GMC Canyon Duramax, Nissan Titan XD, and Toyota Tacoma. Vying for the all-new 2016 Commercial Green Car of the Year™ award are the Chevrolet City Express, Ford Transit Connect, Mercedes-Benz Metris, Nissan NV200, and Ram ProMaster City. "Over the past few decades, new car models have benefitted from design and technology improvements that have brought higher fuel efficiency and greater levels of environmental compatibility," said Green Car Journal and CarsOfChange.com Editor and Publisher Ron Cogan. "With models like these ten deserving finalists, we're witnessing the pickup and light commercial vehicle field enjoying the same attention." The new Commercial Green Car of the Year™ award is part of an expanded awards program presented at this year's 2015 San Antonio Auto & Truck Show.

    How tariffs in China could cause a meltdown in the American South

    Sun, Aug 25 2019

    While BMW is clearly a German company, the crossovers that are exceedingly important to it are actually made in Spartanburg, South Carolina. And more than that, the Spartanburg plant (physically located in the town of Greer) is where the corporate know-how and capability for those vehicles is concentrated. These are the vehicles – specifically, the BMW X3, X4, X5, X6, X7 – that drove record growth for the company in 2018, according to BMW. But whatÂ’s most notable about BMW Group Plant Spartanburg, given current events, is that according to the U.S. Department of Commerce it was the largest automotive exporter by value for the fifth year running in 2018. ThatÂ’s worth emphasizing: largest automotive exporter by value. Not GM. Not Ford. BMW. And where might one assume that more than a few of those X vehicles are shipped to? China. Some 360 miles southwest of Spartanburg is Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc., in in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama. It started building vehicles in 1997. Since then, Daimler AG has invested in excess of $5.5 billion in the facility. It manufactures the crossover now known as the GLE, formerly the ML-Class. It also makes the GLE coupe and GLS. Daimler describes the Tuscaloosa facility as “the traditional home of SUV production” for those vehicles. When it reported its global 2018 sales, Daimler noted that on a global basis SUVs account “for more than a third of all Mercedes-Benz sales.” According to the Chinese finance ministry, on December 15th the Chinese government will impose a 25% tariff on automobiles (and a 5% tariff on auto parts) from the U.S. Certainly this is going to have a direct effect on the sales of vehicles that are manufactured in the U.S. and exported to China. BMW and Mercedes are going to take it on the chin for the vehicles that they make in plants that they invested in so heavily in the U.S. Which could potentially mean that people in places like Greer, South Carolina, and Vance, Alabama, are going to find themselves in the crosshairs of the combatants. Soo too could Lincoln, which produces vehicles in places like Louisville, Kentucky (Navigator), Chicago, Illinois (Aviator) and Flat Rock, Michigan (Continental). Although the Tesla Gigafactory 3 is rapidly nearing completion in Shanghai, it is worth noting that vehicles built in Fremont, California, are being sold in China in numbers that donÂ’t make Musk unhappy.

    BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

    Mon, Oct 10 2016

    While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.