1999 Ford Cargo Van E350 Low Miles on 2040-cars
Cape May, New Jersey, United States
1999 FORD E-350 5.4 V-8 (GAS) AUTO RUNS AND DRIVES GREAT 78K MILES DELIVERY AVAILABLE $1.50 A MILENEW BRAKE ROTORS BRAKE CALIPERS BRAKE LINES REESE HITCH VAN RUNS AND DRIVE GREAT EVERYTHING WORKS NEEDS PAINT HAS A FEW DENTS NO SHELVING INSIDE THE VAN ITS MAKES A GREAT WORK TRUCK! NO NEED TO WORRY ABOUT SCRATCHES THE VAN IS MECHANICALLY VERY GOOD IF YOUR LOOKING FOR A GOOD AFFORDABLE WORK TRUCK!!! I USE THE VAN EVERYDAY On Mar-21-14 at 18:15:33 PDT, seller added the following information: THE VAN HAS NO OIL LEAKS OR ANY FLUIDS, THE ENGINE AND TRANS ARE DRY ON OIL ON THE PANS THIS IS TRUE LOW MILEAGE 77,700 ITS ON THE VEHICLE REPORT TRUCK THAT JUST NEEDS COSMECTICS |
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 2008 ford e-150 regency protege dvd wheelchair lift 29k texas direct auto(US $27,980.00)
- 1994 e-350 14 ft box truck 11,000 gvw
- E-250 commercial low miles van automatic gasoline 4.6l v8 sfi sohc 16v white
- 2005 ford e150 super duty chateau passenger van(US $11,000.00)
- 2006 ford e350 super duty cargo van 5.4l triton v8 fleet maintained new tires!
- 2006 ford e-350 super duty xl standard cargo van 2-door 5.4l(US $7,900.00)
Auto Services in New Jersey
World Class Collision ★★★★★
Warren Wylie & Sons ★★★★★
W & W Auto Body ★★★★★
Union Volkswagen ★★★★★
T`s & Son Auto Repair ★★★★★
South Shore Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
Ford says 70% of its models to get stop-start by 2017
Sun, 15 Dec 2013Ford is following up on a report we posted a few weeks back that the Blue Oval would be adding stop-start technology to its entire model range. Now, the Dearborn-based automaker has announced that the fuel-saving feature would be available on 70 percent of the company's range by 2017.
Ford claims the technology will improve fuel economy by around 3.5 percent, although its actual effect will vary based on how the owner drives - apparently up to a 10-percent improvement is possible for those who sit in heavy traffic (Los Angelenos, this means you). The latest recipient of the technology is the updated 2014 Ford Fiesta with the company's three-cylinder EcoBoost powerplant.
Part of the reasoning for the new addition has to do with cost. Ford claims the tech is affordable and easy to implement. "Simply put, Auto Start-Stop helps customers use less fuel, which is an important component of Ford's Blueprint for Sustainability," Ford's global powertrain vice president, Bob Fascetti, said.
2016 Ford Focus RS may yet be AWD, US sales likely
Fri, 29 Aug 2014When it comes to forbidden fruit, few vehicles are spoken of in as hushed a tone as the Ford Focus RS. The turbocharged, five-cylinder hot hatch could only be seen from afar by American customers as it tore up the roads of Europe. And while it's safe to say that Ford's Yankee fans are quite happy to now be on equal footing with drivers in the old country thanks to the Focus ST, we doubt there'd be much protestation over a successor to the RS arriving stateside.
Of course, we've seen images of the new RS undergoing testing, but a new story by Road and Track aims to fill in some very large blanks in our knowledge of that car, thanks to a pair of mysterious insiders at the Ford. Chief among those is this - the RS will almost certainly make its way to the US, albeit in limited quantities. It gets better, though.
Under hood, the new RS is unsurprisingly expected to borrow the 2.3-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder from the 2015 Ford Mustang and 2015 Lincoln MKC. While that twin-scroll turbo produces 310 horsepower in the Mustang and 285 ponies in the MKC, R&T expects the RS to deliver quite a bit more firepower - 325 to 350 hp, with preference going to the higher output due to the limited-edition nature of the RS. This roughly fits with previous reports.