Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1977 Ford Bronco Uncut And Clean on 2040-cars

Year:1977 Mileage:67537
Location:

Jasper, Tennessee, United States

Jasper, Tennessee, United States
Advertising:

 YOU ARE BIDDING ON A 1977 FORD BRONCO, VERY CLEAN, SOLID, AND STRAIGHT. THIS BRONCOS DOES NOT SMOKE, KNOCK, OR ANYTHING BAD IT IS 100% MECHANICALLY SOUND. IT HAS A 302 V-8 AUTOMATIC TRANS FRONT DISC BRAKES AND POWER STEERING.  IT HAS NEWER 2" DUAL EXHAUST RAN TO THE BACK. EVERYTHING ON THIS BRONCO WORKS DOWN TO THE TAG LIGHT, ALL GAUGES, LIGHTS AND SIGNALS ALL WORK AS THEY SHOULD. THIS BRONCO IS ALL ORIGINAL EXCEPT FOR SMALL BOLT ON REPLACEMENT THINGS SUCH AS SOLENOID,PLUG WIRES VOLTAGE REGULATOR AND BRAIN BOX. AND EXHAUST. IF U HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK. BE SURE TO READ THE LISTING AND LOOK AT ALL PICTURES BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS. THANKS AND HAPPY BIDDING.

Auto Services in Tennessee

Sunset Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Locks & Locksmiths
Address: 1040 Buffalo Trl, Morristown
Phone: (423) 587-5665

Solar Pros Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 2721 N Wright Rd, Alcoa
Phone: (865) 379-0510

Rod`s Tire Company ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 608 Highway 76, White-House
Phone: (615) 581-0430

Rocky Top Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 3269 Winfield Dunn Pkwy, Sevierville
Phone: (865) 932-4144

RCS Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1610 Verona Caney Rd, Belfast
Phone: (931) 422-5075

Raleigh Tire Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive, Brake Repair
Address: 653 W Poplar Ave, Collierville
Phone: (901) 457-5326

Auto blog

Ford Focus PHEV on the way?

Tue, Jan 21 2014

A refreshed Ford Focus is in the works and that means a few details are leaking out. Spy shots from last month indicated the Focus will have a gaping grille just like its "One Ford" global C-segment comrade, the Fiesta. While Ford is being quiet about it, the Focus could also be getting an "Energi" option, joining the C-Max Energi and Fusion Energi in Ford's plug-in hybrid family. The Focus will likely use technology originated in the C-Max Energi that combines a 2.0-liter gasoline engine with an electric motor capable of a 20-mile range, according to Autoexpress. The pure electric Focus is expected to stay in the lineup despite its slow sales; its price range should be similar to what's on the market now. The third-generation Focus looked good enough to become the top-selling nameplate in the world in 2012. Some exterior changes to look for in the Euro-spec model at the Geneva Motor Show in March include a reshaped hood, front wing endplate and rear bumper. Interior spy shots have hinted at an updated dashboard design and a simplified, less cluttered control panel with updated climate controls. Under the hood, there are quite a few power options rumored to be available - a gasoline EcoBoost with up to 123 horsepower and two turbo-diesel TDCI options, a 1.6-liter or 2.0-liter mills that would produce between 94 hp and 161 hp. Then there are new 1.5-liter diesel and 1.5-liter EcoBoost gasoline variants that meet regulations in China, Brazil and Russia.

2015 Ford Transit Connect Wagon

Thu, May 28 2015

The last time I tested a Ford Transit Connect, I needed to drive a group of friends to Boyne, MI, for a long weekend of skiing, snowboarding, and shenanigans. At roughly three hours, the trip is just long enough that my friends asked for something comfortable. A Range Rover would've been ideal. Perhaps a Mercedes-Benz GL or Cadillac Escalade. But no, I chose Transit Connect, to put Ford's small van formula to the test. The tiny van was near the end of its lifecycle in 2012, having debuted in Europe in 2003. Its age was reflected in its loud, underpowered, inefficient engine; noisy, harsh ride; and uncomfortable seats. It was so uncomfortable that we had to stop every hour just to stretch our legs. I didn't have such elaborate plans when this 2015 Transit Connect Wagon arrived in my driveway. But after a week behind the wheel, I can tell that road tripping in this van would be a far, far better experience. The most obvious change for the second-generation model is the styling. It's much better looking than the old TC, looking like the high-roofed spawn of a Focus and Escape. There are a few anomalies, though. First, note the word "Wagon" – that implies passenger van, while the cargo/work-minded Transit Connect is called "Van." Next, this Titanium model is only available on the longer-wheelbase, three-row Wagon. With the LWB configuration, the only tailgate option is a single-piece, lift-up hatch. If you want barn-style doors, get cozy with the short-wheelbase, two-row Transit Connect XLT. Regardless of body style, the Transit Connect Wagon's best styling feature is its enormous greenhouse that guarantees excellent visibility from any angle. The interior adopts a dash layout similar to the Focus. The heated leather seats – standard on the Titanium – are nice enough, but better still is that the chairs are actually comfortable now. The plastics on the dash and doors are still hard and scratchy, but fit and finish is solid. And with major contact points and switchgear that have been pilfered from other Ford products, including the steering wheel, the occasional bad bits in the cabin are easy enough to ignore. With room for three folks in the second row and two more in the back, the Transit Connect Wagon fills a role that is more utilitarian and spartan, but not much less versatile than traditional minivans. The middle row seats feature stadium-style raised seating, and both rows can slide forward and back or fold.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.