Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Ford Ranger Edge Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 3.0l on 2040-cars

Year:2002 Mileage:160325
Location:

Middlesex, New Jersey, United States

Middlesex, New Jersey, United States
Advertising:

For sale is a 2002 Ford Ranger 2WD Standard Cab with 7 Foot Extended Bed. Fire Engine Red with Dark Grey Vinyl Interior. Since new, the truck has had Full Synthetic oil changes every 5,000 miles. Automatic transmission fluid was changed every 40,000 miles with Full Synthetic fluid. New brakes all the way around less than a year old. Truck has never been in an accident, not even a fender bender. Other features include:
161,000 miles
1 Owner!!
Working Air Conditioning
Automatic Transmission
Plastic Bed Liner
Diamond Plate Tool Box
Diamond Plate Bed Rail Caps
Step Bumper for Toe Hitch
Extra Large Wheel Well Mouldings
Window Vent Shades
Trailer Wire Harness
Tinted Glass
This truck was very well taken care of and has a long life ahead of it. Drives great
. Any questions, please ask. Local pick up only.

Ford Aerostar for Sale

Auto Services in New Jersey

Woodland Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 5336 Woodland Ave, Paulsboro
Phone: (215) 729-4041

Westchester Subaru ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 258 E Main St, Haworth
Phone: (914) 347-3377

Wayne Auto Mall Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1935 Route 23 South, Rockaway
Phone: (973) 694-7800

Two Guys Autoplex 2 ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3649 38th St, Secaucus
Phone: (718) 786-4889

Toyota Universe ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1485 US Highway 46 East, Pine-Brook
Phone: (973) 785-4710

Total Automotive, Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 41 Orlando Dr, Gladstone
Phone: (908) 450-7320

Auto blog

Chevy Silverado frame twist test a marketing victory versus Ford

Thu, 16 Oct 2014

The pickup market is so competitive that all three major American makers are constantly trying to find a way to prove their product is the best. The new 2015 Ford F-150 is grabbing headlines at the moment by winning awards and posting segment best numbers. But in a new video, Chevrolet is taking aim squarely at the 2015 F-250 Super Duty in a battle of heavy-duty truck supremacy against the 2015 Chevy Silverado 2500HD... well, in a single metric anyway.
The big numbers from pickups often come down to payload, towing rating and fuel economy, but for this test, Chevy and Howie Long are challenging the torsional rigidity of the trucks' frames, specifically which one flexes less. Long plays the everyman here having the Chevy engineer explain what's going on in the tests. Unsurprisingly for a video on Chevy's official YouTube page, the 2500HD wins out by a good margin. The company also reports that similar results as shown here have been certified in third-party testing.
Check out the video to see the full test. While this might seem like a marketing win for Chevy, Ford isn't immune to it, either. In 2009, the Blue Oval uploaded a similar video comparing the flex under 225 pounds of weight from the bare frames of the F-150, Chevy Silverado, Dodge Ram (as it was still called at the time) and the Toyota Tundra. The results fell in the Blue Oval's favor, as you can see here.

Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 has a bit of a dyno issue

Tue, 28 May 2013

We're of the mind that each and every dyno should come with Murphy's Law painted in big, visible letters down the side. For every ten successful dyno runs out there, it seems there's one where events to horribly wrong. Take, for example, the video below. The clip shows what happens when a Ford Shelby GT500 and a mobile dyno have a bit of a disagreement at the Performance Expo 24 in Sherbrooke, Quebec. We won't spoil the results for you, but we will say there's some substantial carnage involved.
It's unclear just how much damage ensues from the dust up or whether anyone was harmed in the incident, but from the looks of things, everyone made it out without serious injury. If only we could say the same for the machines involved. Check out the video below.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.