2006 Chrysler Crossfire on 2040-cars
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
2006 Chrysler Crossfire Convertible Very Good Condition For Its Age. The CarRuns And Drives Very Well. Engine Runs Smooth And Transmission Shifts As ItShould. Interior Very Clean. All Lights And Electronics Work As Advertised. RearSpoiler Raises And Lowers Smoothly. Convertible Top Raises And Lowers AsDesigned. Paint Has Beautiful Shine With No Major Dents Or Scratches. As Seen InPictures, Wheels Are In Great Shape,with Only Right Rear Being Marred But DamageIs Hardly Noticeable. The Car Has A Brand New Oem Convertible Top, Which WasProfessionally Installed Last Year. New Bfgoodrich G Force T/a Tires WereInstalled Last Year Also. These Cars At This Age Have A Major Weakness Of TheRear Window Coming Loose From The Top. You Will Not Have To Worry As I HaveReplaced This One. This Alone Will Save You Nearly $3000.00, That Many OthersFor Sale Will End Up Costing You. In Addition To The $1000.00 The New Tires WillSave. I Don't Feel You Can Find A Better One Than This At The PriceI'm Asking. I'm Only Selling Because My Wife Has Been Injured And CanNo Longer Get In Or Out Of The Car Easily. My Reserve Is Very All That I've Done To Maintain It.
Send me questions at : lowensteinagneta@yahoo.com
Chrysler Crossfire for Sale
Chrysler: crossfire base convertible 2-door(US $7,500.00)
Chrysler: crossfire srt(US $9,500.00)
Chrysler: crossfire srt6(US $10,000.00)
Chrysler: crossfire crossfire ltd(US $7,600.00)
Chrysler crossfire limited(US $2,000.00)
Chrysler crossfire limited convertible 2-door(US $2,000.00)
Auto Services in Mississippi
Whitworth Bros Automotive ★★★★★
Tupelo Wrecker Service Inc. ★★★★★
The Tire Depot ★★★★★
South Tire & Automotive ★★★★★
Roby`s Front End Brake Service ★★★★★
Rainbow Chrysler Dodge Jeep Of McComb LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Canada bailed out GM, Chrysler without really knowing what they were getting into
Tue, Dec 2 2014The Auditor General of Canada recently issued a report that makes at least one thing clear: it doesn't know how effective Canadian government loans given to General Motors and Chrysler in 2009 were in ensuring the viability of both companies. That year, the Canadian and Ontario governments dished out $10.8 billion CAD ($9.6B US) to GM and $2.9 billion CAD ($2.6B US) to Chrysler, but hadn't yet sorted out precisely how the funds were to be used before disbursing them. This happened in spite of the fact that, according to a piece in Bloomberg, the loans weren't meant to be handed out until authorities were clear on the manufacturers' plans for reorganization. In fact, federal officials hadn't finished establishing the concessions made by all the involved parties, the pension liabilities, nor the long-term soundness of the automakers' financial positions. On top of that, apparently it didn't keep close tabs on the money after loaning it: the report says that $1B CAD should have been applied to GM Canada pension plans but was instead given to GM to use. Chrysler repaid $1.7 billion, while GM handed back $3.8 billion and Bloomberg believes the feds in Ottawa still own 110 million shares of The General, which, at the stock price as of writing, would be good for another $3.9 billion. Those were mad, bad days, though, and we're not sure what point the report serves, other than to say, "Oh, by the way...." News Source: BloombergImage Credit: Bill Pugliano / Getty Images Government/Legal Chrysler GM bailout
Marchionne says the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart were terrible investments for FCA
Mon, Jan 9 2017In a press conference during the Detroit Auto Show, Sergio Marchionne was quite candid about why the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart were discontinued altogether without replacement. He essentially said they weren't worth the trouble. "I can tell you right now that both the Chrysler 200 and the Dodge Dart, as great products as they were, were the least financially rewarding enterprises that we've carried out inside FCA in the last eight years," Marchionne said. "I don't know one investment that was as bad as these two were." Marchionne was responding to a question about whether he felt the company's shift toward trucks and SUVs and sacrifice in sedan development was shortsighted. Marchionne said he felt that the market would likely continue to be strong for trucks and SUVs, and that the sedan market requires enormous investment that might not pay off. He used the 200 and Dart as examples. When we tried out the 200 and the Dart, we had mixed feelings. We enjoyed the 200's potent V6, pleasant interior, and solid handling. However, it was lacking in space (especially in the rear seat area), and doesn't drive any better than the top vehicles in the midsize sedan class. As for the Dart, it was fairly roomy, and had great infotainment thanks to Uconnect, but lackluster handling and a surprising amount of weight left it only average. With that in mind, it's probably not a bad idea to get rid of the 200 and Dart. The sedan segment is shrinking, and FCA can only afford to invest in areas where it can be a class-leader. Related Video:
Consumer Reports says these are the worst new cars of 2014
Thu, 27 Feb 2014Consumer Reports has announced its annual list of worst vehicles, a cringe-inducing contrast to its list of top vehicles. Ignominiously leading the way in 2014 is Chrysler, which has a staggering seven models listed.
Jeep nearly sweeps the small SUV segment by itself, with its Compass, Patriot and 2.4-liter version of the new Cherokee, while the only midsize sedans listed by CR were the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger. The new Dodge Dart and the Dodge Journey round out CR's condemnation of Chrysler.
Ford is taking heat as well, with the Taurus, Edge and their counterparts from Lincoln all listed as the worst vehicles in their respective segments. Toyota doesn't fare much better, with its Lexus IS, Scion iQ and tC also making the list.
